Only monkeypox can save Australia now;)

I am looking forward to the next 4 years of government lies, economic devastation, abuse, humiliation and death. It will be so much easier to endure, knowing that most people are ok with it. The bonus is that I did not give up my sovereignty for collective representation, did not empower the authority of the state, so I will continue to be an independent observer of this ‘animal farm democracy’.

Let me clarify one point. The government does not represent you, they never have, they never could, they never will. Collective representation of conflicting views violates the law of non-contradiction and is therefore absurd, literal non-sense. They only tricked you to consent to be obediently ruled by them. And for this reason they don’t teach the laws of logic in schools.

“Tonight, the Australian people have voted for change.” (Anthony Albanese) I can’t believe he is already making threats. 😂

In the spirit of universal reconciliation, I expect Anthony Albanese to write our shared human ancestors into the Commonwealth Constitution as the Original Owners of the Earth. Our moral sovereignty was never ceded (apart from those who voted yesterday).

Collective representation collateralises your identity. The vote was a four-year contract for your soul.

Yuval Noah Harari, the WEF ‘philosopher’ of the Great Reset, tells us that a new class of useless, powerless people will emerge due to technological progress. This would be trivially true (useless and powerless people always existed) unless his ‘prediction’ carried an implicit moral judgement: that ‘useless people’ have a lower moral status (intrinsically subhuman) than ‘useful people’ (human). We must therefore understand Harari’s message not as a statement of fact but as a moral manifesto, or more precisely, a statement of utilitarian anti-morality, which is not at all original: it is historically associated with fascism as the pseudo-morality that motivated its crimes against humanity. In the following article I explain why this utilitarian view is pseudo-moral and self-defeating. https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2020/05/31/what-is-the-value-of-useless-people/

Utilitarians are useless eaters. Feminists are just clumps of cells. Another way, by devaluing the humanity of others we also, inescapably, devalue ourselves. #Détournement

Anyone who describes the evidence of organised crime as a ‘conspiracy theory’ should be regarded as a suspect.

No human being can lie so persistently and comprehensively as the “global leaders” at Davos, without already having disintegrated their humanity. They look human, they move like human, but there is nobody inside. These entities lack an integrated Self.

Over the years I heard cool people saying: Be in the Now, the Time is Now, stay in the present etc. as if this phenomenological commitment entailed some kind of spiritual transcendence. There was a time when I was partial to this view, which seemed so obviously correct. Today I can say that the NOW, the Present, is precisely the point in time that does not exist. It is empty of information, and therefore of meaning, because meaning requires information and information requires duration and context, both of which extend in time, beyond the Now. The meaning of every “moment” draws on our deepest past, and could not exist without it. The Now (as an ideal) is a lie, at best a mistake, but the totality of human relations is also elusive. We exist somewhere between the now and the eternity, but whereas we existentially depend on the eternity, the now is merely a conceptual abstraction allowing us to contextualise attention and focus, experience reality in digestible pieces that can be integrated into a meaningful whole only over time. The mystics of the Present misunderstood themselves; they took the present experience of the totality of being as the present itself (a category mistake). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3735180

I hereby declare the 26 of May as the international day against flu-phobia, germophobia and corona-bigotry; the day of the year we all take a stand against discrimination against the fever, sneeze and cough diverse community. End all flu-like-discrimination now! No more hate, no more exclusion, no more apartheid.

The same people who want to restrict personal firearm ownership in America (because ‘guns kill people’) are determined to flood Ukraine with a virtually unlimited supply and assortment of the state of the art killing machines, no questions asked, and incite them to fight their Russian-speaking brothers to the last drop of blood. I am not sure whether this differential treatment means they want to harm the Americans, or harm the Ukrainians.

Feminism is a concept developed to displace the culpability of the tyrants with factional animosity among the oppressed masses. Feminism is based on the logically false premise that because ‘females were oppressed’ they were <therefore> oppressed because of being female. In fact, females (and males) were systemically oppressed because of their class, not because of their gender. This psychological recipe is reproduced in many contexts, some examples: a) Anthropogenic Climate Change uses the technique of re-focalisation to create the impression of universal (and more or less equal) culpability of all humans for resource exploitation, while only a tiny minority disproportionally benefits from the industrial exploitation of resources; b) systemic racism displaces the culpability of a tiny minority of systemic parasites with racial divisions within the working class; c) Covid/Pandemic where everyone is a biological threat… d) debt bubble, where all borrowers are responsible for the financial collapse, etc.

Imagine if Covid vaccines were either a placebo or otherwise ineffective but harmless, and the much publicised deaths of sport stars were caused by something else. The overall excess deaths statistics do not show a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths. The experts predicting mass deaths from vaccines to occur late last year were wrong. What if the vaccine were merely a means to make you acquiesce to the removal of the right to free medical consent, possibly to be exploited in the future, or to force you to make a fundamental moral choice, reveal your moral character? Yes, this is just a far fetched fantasy, but I like to think laterally.

Those who are physically weaker but intellectually equal always are dominated on that level, and this is the most apparent in classes where physical capabilities are highly valued (ie the working class). But there are other forms of domination that are non-force based but desire/attraction/emotion/guilt based (feminism and all political movements based on victimhood are a form of guilt-based domination, victimhood as currency). The way that oppression is quantified within a class is also at best arbitrary, but often already infused with ideological antagonism. As far as I can tell the only consistent moral standard is in terms of Right vs Wrong, where every action stands on its own merits and must be criticised or defended on its own merits. When the moral judgement is systematised, ideologies, attached to an in-group identity, politicised as an -ism, it is already something wrong, because it simplifies morality to an identity-based induction formula (this is a logical error), alters the resolution of moral thinking from Right/Wrong to Us/Them (ecological fallacy, identity fallacy, and arbitrary truncation of the moral context…). In short, in becoming an -ism the moral content is perverted, in a number of ways.

A reminder that in an ethical society (which Australia is CLEARLY not!) lockdowns would fail on moral grounds (restriction of freedom, theft of property rights) even if they passed a CBA.

Mankind has a long journey to go to become a moral species.

[Extract from my book]

For those unclear about why lockdowns are so devastating, here's US data that shows how a good number of people failed to get diagnosed/ treated during the lockdowns and hysteria.

https://bit.ly/3NrjppG

Interestingly, Sweden has had NO EXCESS DEATHS in 2021 and virtually none in 2022, which means there was literally no drop-off in its normal health care, diagnosis and treatment.

This basic moral fact relates to lockdowns and mandatory vaccines. We know that lockdowns kill some people, primarily due to social isolation and the withholding of routine medical screening and care. We also know that vaccines kill some healthy people.

On Disgust

All deformed representations of the human form evoke deep-seated disgust, because we are a product of over one hundred thousand years of phenomenological conditioning in what humanity ‘is a-like’, which guides both our aesthetic sensibility and ontological sensitivity. The human form, especially the face, constitutes the phenomenological foundation of our socially reflexive consciousness, so everything that de-faces or de-forms humanity also subverts our own being; it is sensed as phenomenologically aberrant. We all sense it on some level, but we can also conceptually override it. This is why intellectuals, art critics, can act as if perfectly comfortable with grotesque representations of the human form, but on a deeper personal level there is an internalised split, a contradiction between the phenomenological conditions of our being and the conceptual object of aberrant fascination. No matter how skilfully and consistently we can contextualise and bracket-off the aberrant (as symbolic, progressive, transcendent, cultural etc) we cannot remain unaffected and undamaged on some level. One of the most pathological symptoms of our times is perhaps the intellectual circumvention and shaming of disgust. Disgust ‘protects’ us from reflexively internalising the aberrant in the act of identifying with the Other as a being of the same kind. It is a psychological defence from dis-integration and we ought not be ashamed of it, not deny it. We can be disgusted and yet conceptually engaged, seek for the common ground beneath the disgust, without lying to ourselves and without deforming ourselves to fit the aberrant.