If a parliament can legislate anything, irrespective of whether it is objectively right or wrong, then, by virtue of its own constitution, it is not within the law.

Modern conspiracies are not just organised crimes executed in secret. This is fake news, so last century. Modern conspiracies proudly reveal themselves as conspiracies, but they also exaggerate themselves, leave evidence and countless inconsistencies all over the place that the deception is bigger, weirder, more unbelievable, more conspiratorial than it really is. Let the conspiracy buffs chew on these bones, scream from the rooftops, pull their hair in frustration of not being believed in the face of such ‘obvious’ evidence of a conspiracy. Meanwhile, the majority will accept whatever conclusions the newspapers present to them and laugh at the cospiracy theorists in the vein of “do you think the government is that stupid, to leave evidence all over the place so schmucks like you can figure it all out?” People on both sides of any narrative are gullible, biased, irrational, and governments know it; the rest is cybernetics.

I have fully consolidated my blogs on Substack, including articles going back to 2017. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/archive

Both are tribal, both practice occult rituals, both profess the core element of Nazi ideology (nativism), both believe that social privileges are passed by blood/race, but the weaker one is envious of the stronger one. Tribalism, no matter how it is dressed up, be it in animal furs and no shoes or a crimson robe adorned with precious stones, is not a solution but the core problem of humanity.

Daily consumption of milk proteins will also exacerbate folate deficiency in the brains of vaccine recipients. “casein or casamino acids derived from bovine milk is used for [vaccine] culture. One of those milk proteins is the bovine folate receptor alpha protein (…) which causes IgE mediated sensitization to bovine folate receptor alpha (FRA). Once sensitized, upon consuming milk, the person starts making IgG4 antibodies directed against FRA. These IgG4 cross-react with human FRA in the choroid plexus, block folate uptake to the brain thus resulting in cerebral folate deficiency (CFD). A milk-free diet reduces IgG4 levels thus improving CFD. A milk-free diet downregulates folate receptor autoimmunity in cerebral folate deficiency syndrome. Cerebral folate deficiency in the developing brain, results in autism: Cerebral folate receptor autoantibodies in autism spectrum disorder.” From Vinu Arumugham, https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/cows-milk-protein-contaminated-vaccines

Australian financial institutions currently hold trillion $3.4 of debt (comprised of loans and advances), including trillion $2.1 worth of housing loans/mortgages. https://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/tables/xls/d02hist.xls All AUD currency on issue is trillion $0.1, therefore only 3% of the outstanding loans are covered by government-issued money, the remaining 97% is created by the financial institutions as credit, which devalues the savings of all Australians. In essence, financial institutions create 97% of AUD denominated money and charge interest on it, and the net interest accrued to them (ie. the gross interest taken from debtors minus the gross interest paid to depositors) is expropriated from the savings of everyone else, via monetary devaluation. Note that the rate of expropriation is not equal to price inflation (CPI), but is roughly equal to the rate of price inflation plus the rate of GDP growth. Under a constant money supply and positive GDP growth, free from systemic expropriation, prices should be dropping (the purchasing power of AUD increasing) at the rate of economic growth. For example, if inflation is 6% and GDP growth is 2% then the rate of expropriation is approximately 8%.

What is Ethics?

Ethics in the most rudimentary sense is concerned with the distinction between Right and Wrong actions with respect to other beings of the same kind, or what we call the social dimension. We can only speculate about the origins of ethics but the most plausible hypothesis is that social experience has taught early hominids what actions result in better social outcomes, which were probably geared to group survival. These practical insights were progressively formalised as customs, laws and religion. Our modern institutions were build on the prevailing ethical principles, not only because these were socially internalised as the shared moral conscience, but because we became aware that the integrity of the social dimension, which is sustained by ethics, is inseparable from the conditions of social constructs such as meaning and culture. A meaningful existence is necessarily an ethical existence, and the degree of meaning is commensurate with the degree of ethical consistency of the individual and the society. Immanuel Kant was the first philosopher to demonstrate analytically that ethics is necessarily grounded in what all rational agents value about themselves: the uniquely human capacity to bestow worth on things, actions and ideas. According to Kant, in order for this capacity to be consistently expressed at the social level we must respect it not only in ourselves but in everyone else: “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, never merely as a means to an end, but always at the same time as an end." To do otherwise would be self-defeating and universally harmful. Kant’s argument was still open to the technical objection that even if we can achieve better societal outcomes by acting ethically as a collective, an individual is not obliged to value this collective good if he can benefit personally at the expense of society. I have formally refuted this objection, by showing that ethical conduct is indispensable to maintaining a psychologically integrated Self: https://philpapers.org/rec/KOWODO

In essence, we must act ethically, in the minimalist Kantian sense, to preserve not only the integrity of the social dimension but also a meaningful existence as individuals.

My approach to medical ethics has two levels: a) at the lower level I consider the most fundamental moral/ethical norms that our society already accepts (for example, the right to life) and analyse whether a specific policy is consistent with those norms; b) at the higher level I attempt to demonstrate a priori that certain moral principles are objective in the sense that the associated moral wrongs have negative existential consequences for society and for the person who commits them. As an additional feature, I stress the importance of being able to substantiate a) in terms of b), which is presupposed by my commitment to ethical realism.

I have written more on Kantian ethics and its relationship to religious ethics here: https://philpapers.org/rec/KOWTGR (this paper is currently under peer review)

Science does not matter to those who are denied the right to free medical consent. All you need to know to refuse a medical intervention is that your human rights will be denied if you refuse it, and if you do not know that this is ‘all you need to know’ then medical risks are not the primary threat you are facing.

What do you call someone who is acting intentionally incompetent?

This tells us that apart from those people who are voluntarily wearing masks (literal fascists, capable of committing crimes against humanity when ordered to do so) only about 0.05% of victorians would rather follow their moral conscience then betray it to avoid a $100 fine. 1 person per 1810. This also proves that moral conscience and democracy are two diametrical opposites.

Going along with a lie to get along perpetuates and normalises the lie. To defeat the lie we must be seen not going along with it. Compliance with unethical orders is complicity.

Another scientist claims to have found “self-assembling nano structures” in Covid vaccines. We are only presented with a video of microscopic images, and only the scientist’s assertions for what they are of, so I had questions and suggestions. I got the impression that by not automatically believing the assertions makes me a bad sport.

The majority is no doubt expected to react to this, lament the loss of morals and sanity, your emotional spring loaded to the breaking point, ready for rupture when a solution is finally presented by your rulers. Or maybe all this is done to teach us how to think, how to reason to defend ourselves from insanity, not just rely on traditional conventions.

The UK government creates hundreds of fake “freedom movement” and “anti-vaxxer” social media accounts: https://reclaimthenet.org/germany-creates-fake-extremist-social-media-accounts/