Science does not matter to those who are denied the right to free medical consent. All you need to know to refuse a medical intervention is that your human rights will be denied if you refuse it, and if you do not know that this is ‘all you need to know’ then medical risks are not the primary threat you are facing.
What do you call someone who is acting intentionally incompetent?
This tells us that apart from those people who are voluntarily wearing masks (literal fascists, capable of committing crimes against humanity when ordered to do so) only about 0.05% of victorians would rather follow their moral conscience then betray it to avoid a $100 fine. 1 person per 1810. This also proves that moral conscience and democracy are two diametrical opposites.
Another scientist claims to have found “self-assembling nano structures” in Covid vaccines. We are only presented with a video of microscopic images, and only the scientist’s assertions for what they are of, so I had questions and suggestions. I got the impression that by not automatically believing the assertions makes me a bad sport.
Irrational governments need irrational resistance to make themselves seem rational and normal.
The majority is no doubt expected to react to this, lament the loss of morals and sanity, your emotional spring loaded to the breaking point, ready for rupture when a solution is finally presented by your rulers. Or maybe all this is done to teach us how to think, how to reason to defend ourselves from insanity, not just rely on traditional conventions.
The UK government creates hundreds of fake “freedom movement” and “anti-vaxxer” social media accounts: https://reclaimthenet.org/germany-creates-fake-extremist-social-media-accounts/
Reclaim The Net
German government creates hundreds of fake “right-wing extremist” social media accounts
Sockpuppets.
The following in vitro (test tube) study shows that Pfizer vaccine mRNA can be converted to DNA (from mRNA) inside human cells. This is of course very concerning, but does not mean that the mRNA becomes part of human DNA (is absorbed into the human genome); it is only converted (transcribed) to a free floating DNA sequence that is not part of the human genome. The authors of the study explain: “At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination.” https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm
“With mountains of documentation, mostly from government and corporate sources, Sutton shows that Soviet military technology is heavily dependent on U.S. and allied gifts, "peaceful trade" and exchange programs. We've built for, sold or traded, or given outright to the Communists everything from copper wiring and military trucks to tank technology, missile guidance technology, computers - even the Space Shuttle.” In short, the Soviet superpower was built with American money and technology transfers, where Cold War soviet espionage was perhaps only the public face given to intentional intelligence sharing. Incompetence was always the best cover for treason and conspiracy. It would be naive to assume that the Russian state is now an independent player, fighting for their own people. The theatre of war is indeed just theatre, with millions of unwitting extras who end up real dead. https://www.amazon.com.au/Best-Enemy-Money-Can-Buy/dp/1939438543/
Amazon
The Best Enemy Money Can Buy
The Best Enemy Money Can Buy
A publicly owned bank, proposed by Malcolm Roberts https://news.1rj.ru/str/senatorroberts/738, is a great idea. In fact, all credit issuing institutions should be publicly owned since credit inflates the money supply and thus functions as an indirect tax on the entire economy. The only Fair banking is public banking. https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/how-money-works
Telegram
SENATOR ROBERTS UNCENSORED
The Big 4 banks have been ripping Australians off for decades. Taking all the profits, they're leaving regional communities in the dust, closing branches and strangling small business capital. We need a people's bank in Australia.
I had the pleasure of speaking…
I had the pleasure of speaking…
Public banks create money at interest to the public instead of drawing revenue via income tax. Private banks create money at interest to the banks and thus covertly tax the public via inflation, on top of the income tax. The choice is a no-brainer: we have nothing to lose and everything to gain by legislating for all credit issuing institutions to be publicly owned.
Why be Rational?
The idea of “different ways of knowing”, implying that different standards of rationality are equally rational, equally valid, presupposes a universal, singular standard of rationality according to which all the multiple standards are ascertained as “valid”, thus negating the idea that there are multiple standards, therefore non-sense. Moreover, to deny the existence of a one, universal standard of rationality, consisting of the laws of non-contradiction, excluded middle and identity, is to deny the possibility of common meaning, a common bond, therefore it amounts to denying humanity.
One may ask, why be rational? Non-adherence to the law of non-contradiction impedes our capacity to reliably realise our intentions, to be reliable and trustworthy, to understand others and be comprehensible, to generate common meaning, and this leads to practical failure, alienation, violence and suffering. It is therefore in everyone’s interest to be rational.
https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/how-be-rational-about-being-right
The idea of “different ways of knowing”, implying that different standards of rationality are equally rational, equally valid, presupposes a universal, singular standard of rationality according to which all the multiple standards are ascertained as “valid”, thus negating the idea that there are multiple standards, therefore non-sense. Moreover, to deny the existence of a one, universal standard of rationality, consisting of the laws of non-contradiction, excluded middle and identity, is to deny the possibility of common meaning, a common bond, therefore it amounts to denying humanity.
One may ask, why be rational? Non-adherence to the law of non-contradiction impedes our capacity to reliably realise our intentions, to be reliable and trustworthy, to understand others and be comprehensible, to generate common meaning, and this leads to practical failure, alienation, violence and suffering. It is therefore in everyone’s interest to be rational.
https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/how-be-rational-about-being-right
Michael Kowalik’s Newsletter
How to be Rational about being Right
Lord (2017) has rigorously demonstrated that what we are rationally required to do is just what we Ought to do. This conclusion nonetheless raises the question as to what exactly counts as Rationality. Do normative judgements made on the basis of, for example…
Irrational cultures are conquered and perish.
Rationality dictates that irrational cultures Ought to be conquered (by rationality) and allowed to perish.
Rationality dictates that irrational cultures Ought to be conquered (by rationality) and allowed to perish.
Leadership is antithetical to individual moral authority and freedom. Dogs have leaders; morally responsible humans think in their own words, learn from interacting with others and make their own moral determinations, but do not follow.
Claiming privilege on the basis of ancestry commits one to also accept any liability for the actions of one’s ancestors (all of them). On this basis, everyone who claims ancestral privilege (for example, monarchy) is guilty of murder.
Vaccine mandates imply that being born human is no longer a guarantee of the right to life, coercing us to periodically submit to a medical procedure that some will not survive.
If many lives are more valuable than a few lives, allowing for legalised killing of a few innocents to protect the majority, than we also ought to mandate that women must have babies as often as possible, abortion prohibited in all cases, because more babies means more humans, therefore more value. More humans (more value) need more room, more food, more services, so we also ought to appropriate all natural resources to maximise the human population. Is this what you really want, Klaus? So let us agree that all lives have absolute moral status rather than cumulative value, and therefore nobody can be deprived of life for the benefit of others.
Forwarded from Normal (Michael Kowalik)
A: UTILITARIAN THESIS
Lives do not have absolute value, therefore it is permissible to sacrifice a few lives to save many lives.
What makes the many lives valuable?
The absolute value of life.
B: REVERSE UTILITARIAN THESIS
Life is valuable, therefore we have the moral obligation to save many lives, even if this requires sacrificing a few lives.
What makes the fewer lives less valuable than many lives?
Lives do not have absolute value.
GO BACK TO A:
Lives do not have absolute value, therefore it is permissible to sacrifice a few lives to save many lives.
What makes the many lives valuable?
The absolute value of life.
B: REVERSE UTILITARIAN THESIS
Life is valuable, therefore we have the moral obligation to save many lives, even if this requires sacrificing a few lives.
What makes the fewer lives less valuable than many lives?
Lives do not have absolute value.
GO BACK TO A:
RETHINKING THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT (Report)
“The IPCC claims that the atmosphere, warmed by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations, has heated the oceans below. However, this cannot be true, because, in the tropics at least, the atmosphere is cooler than the ocean.
Varying carbon dioxide concentrations do have an influence; as they increase, the emission of radiation to the surface increases, warming the ocean surface. However, as noted in Table 1, the effect over the tropics is small. In fact, it is possible to calculate that the increase in carbon dioxide concentration, from 337 ppm to 411 ppm, only results in an increased energy flow of 0.3 W/m2. That is far too little to explain an increased ocean temperature of 0.4°C, because the increased temperature in turn increases the flow of energy to the atmosphere by about 3.5 W/m2.
In other words, while a small amount of extra energy has gone into the tropical ocean surface as a result of increased carbon dioxide concentrations, eight times as much has been escaping to the atmosphere. The absorption of additional radiation energy from the change in carbon dioxide concentration is insufficient to support the rise in latent heat loss from the increase in surface temperature.
This leaves changes in ocean currents as the only plausible explanation for the warming of the tropical reservoir. Importantly, this idea is supported by real-world evidence, such as the observed slowing of the Gulf Stream.”
https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2022/09/Kininmonth-Greenhouse-Effect.pdf
“The IPCC claims that the atmosphere, warmed by increasing carbon dioxide concentrations, has heated the oceans below. However, this cannot be true, because, in the tropics at least, the atmosphere is cooler than the ocean.
Varying carbon dioxide concentrations do have an influence; as they increase, the emission of radiation to the surface increases, warming the ocean surface. However, as noted in Table 1, the effect over the tropics is small. In fact, it is possible to calculate that the increase in carbon dioxide concentration, from 337 ppm to 411 ppm, only results in an increased energy flow of 0.3 W/m2. That is far too little to explain an increased ocean temperature of 0.4°C, because the increased temperature in turn increases the flow of energy to the atmosphere by about 3.5 W/m2.
In other words, while a small amount of extra energy has gone into the tropical ocean surface as a result of increased carbon dioxide concentrations, eight times as much has been escaping to the atmosphere. The absorption of additional radiation energy from the change in carbon dioxide concentration is insufficient to support the rise in latent heat loss from the increase in surface temperature.
This leaves changes in ocean currents as the only plausible explanation for the warming of the tropical reservoir. Importantly, this idea is supported by real-world evidence, such as the observed slowing of the Gulf Stream.”
https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2022/09/Kininmonth-Greenhouse-Effect.pdf