Misinformation discredits the source. When governments, corporations or the mass media spread misinformation they discredit themselves. They are indeed the primary sources of disinformation (intentional misinformation, also known as propaganda) and have zero credibility on any political issue. The only Real opposition to these deceitful entities are not the activists who ‘fight’ the official narrative, but those who counter misinformation ‘in principle’ and themselves do not misinform. This requires not only good intentions but sophisticated skills in evaluating information for consistency and grounding, and formulating statements in a way that avoids ambiguity and does not claim too much. The main problem with much of the ‘freedom movement’ and the ‘anti-vaccination movement’ is that they do spread misinformation on daily basis, embellish the facts, claim too much, present speculation as fact; they care only about countering the establishment but not about the truth, which is the only source of legitimacy, and falsity is repugnant to it irrespective of whom it serves. The enemy of a profound lie can be another profound lie.

One of the most effective forms of counter-propaganda is to trick the adversary into claiming too much and thus discredit themselves. Inciting the adversary to blame a particular race or ethnicity for some existential problem is the oldest trick in the book.

Global Alert! White Supremacist Ants, otherwise known as Extermites, take over the Earth. The white supremacist ant population is estimated at 400 Quadrillion, and growing. In a late night zoom session, the UN Security Council has passed an emergency resolution, deprioritising all other emergencies, including Covid-19, climate change and Ukraine, to the IGNORE status, and ordering all global resources to be directed to fighting the white supremacist ant invasion.

I think what you're highlighting is actually a failing of the people to keep their governments in check. They have become docile, perhaps because they are used to being instructed throughout their lives and have never actually matured into independent adults who use logic and reason to make their own decisions. Just like Event 201 and other pandemic simulations were run to plan for what to do in the case of a disease outbreak, the people could have been planning for how they would influence and resist government responses to prevent overreach. So long as we don't act like independent adults that can work together, we leave a vacuum for tyrants to step into.

Conspiracy Theory as Political Science

Wargaming of government corruption is essentially a formal construction and study of conspiracy theories. No wonder “conspiracy theory” became a tactic to derogate from this serious and necessary academic endeavour. Corruption of ‘authority’ does not like to be predicted and challenged.

No student should be allowed to graduate in Political Science without satisfactorily completing a module on Conspiracy Theory, which would require demonstrated proficiency in constructing and wargaming consistent, hypothetical scenarios of corruption of authority in their own social and political systems.

Any opposition/activism that is chiefly reactionary is just a continuation of the status quo. The ruling power regularly throws them a bone and they chew on it. Good dog.

“Trust the experts” is logically equivalent to the famous Q dictum: “trust the plan”. Almost as if the same people are behind both of these articulations of ‘the same’.

Based on the following analysis, at current interest rates, the price of real estate must still drop by 18.3% (nationally) for the stock of housing awaiting sale to clear. This is assuming that the stock remains the same as at the beginning of the year, but whereas some will be able to delay selling, the higher interest rates will compel others to sell due to unsustainable pressure on their budget. https://www.realestate.com.au/news/covid-made-people-forget-latest-reserve-bank-rate-hike-creates-new-dilemma-for-home-buyers/

Why is Antisemitism so prevalent in the Freedom Movement

The “freedom movement” has adopted an apocalyptic Christian rhetoric, asserting that humanity is currently in a ‘spiritual war’ against the forces of evil. By symbolically contextualising the Great Reset as a conflict between the sacrificial Baal cult of ancient Israel (a narrative that is abundantly catered to by the leading cultural institutions and governments to a degree that is almost comedic) Vs. Jesus (crucified by Jews), the figureheads of the freedom movement implicitly cultivate the association that the enemy is “the Jew”. The warlike religious rhetoric is also a commitment to religious animosity, designating an absolute impasse (God/Jesus vs Satan/Baal) that can be solved only by force, instead of resorting to rational deliberation to resolve human disagreements. In this sense, antisemitism is an integral part of the symbolic narrative promulgated by the freedom movement, and this is likely to be its undoing. Anyone who uses religion to support their political views, inviting you to participate in a Holy War, is not part of the solution, and certainly not about freedom.

Many people believe that the ‘one eyed covered’ gesture used in entertainment advertising means that all these artists or celebrities are Masons, iIlluminati, Satanists etc. A more likely interpretation is that this is just marketing, playing on the curiosity, boredom and anxiety of the masses to hint at a deeper narrative, a global conspiracy. Much more exciting, isn’t it? Attention is money. But there is a deeper, symbolic level of interpretation that can be suggested. The one eye also means the one eye of the audience; fixated, amblyopic, unable to see laterally, hypnotised by Their message. They may also be just mocking YOU for fun. Man is a Mirror.

It is easier for people to believe that a politician or a media personality is a fool who ’slipped up’ and gave away some evil conspiracy, some big secret, than to accept that it is you who is being fooled, led by your nose towards a predetermined re-action. The same politicians and media personalities never slip up and tell you anything incriminating about their own tax affairs, just saying.

Mass media cheering Ukrainian war crimes. They do this for a reason, reverse psychology, and judging by the comments the public opinion is already turning. I suspect that following the present strategy of depopulation, killing off males, the partitioning of Ukraine is on the cards. Then, perhaps, the partitioning of Russia.

Email Response to the Queensland Human Rights Commissioner (06.10.2022)

(My first email: https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/1846)

I have received a response from QHRC, in which the Commissioner expresses concern with how the vaccine mandates affect human rights. The Comissioner writes: “The Commission is involved in matters currently before court which relate to vaccine mandates. This is one of the most appropriate vehicles for examining the human rights compatibility of these measures, as courts have the ability to seek and assess evidence and to make a ruling on the compatibility or otherwise of the mandates, which the Commission does not legally have the power to do.” I responded as follows:

Dear Commissioner,

Thank you for your response. I understand the statutory constraints you are working under. Like you, I am professionally impartial on this issue, drawing conclusions only on the basis of logical necessity from commonly accepted premises.

I have two technical suggestions to offer, if I may, regarding the wording of the section noscriptd “Why isn’t mandatory vaccination a breach of my human rights?” https://www.qhrc.qld.gov.au/your-rights/covid-19-and-human-rights/vaccination-and-your-rights

1. In order not to presume a legal conclusion, I suggest changing the noscript of the section to ‘Why mandatory vaccination is not necessarily a breach of my human rights?’ OR ‘Is mandatory vaccination a breach of my human rights?’

2. In the opening paragraph, the list of relevant human rights affected by vaccine mandates is missing ‘the right to life’. I suggest including this right in the list, since some people are known to have died as a result of the vaccines. Vaccine mandates, by applying significant economic and social-opportunity coercion to vaccinate, are expected to cause a percentage of vaccine-related deaths.

Utilitarianism is defeated by individual dissent

Before utility can provide a meaningful measure of net value of action, we must first know the full scope of all relevant kinds of utility, but we cannot know them. This is primarily because there are infinite possibilities of conceiving and quantifying value, and no objective measure to verify them, apart from universal consensus. If there is just one objector, no utilitarian standard is possible.

The right to life is omitted in the list of rights affected by vaccine mandates, but included in the list of rights the government must defend by means of vaccine mandates. What a curious oversight. https://www.qhrc.qld.gov.au/your-rights/covid-19-and-human-rights/vaccination-and-your-rights