If wearing a face-mask is just like wearing a seat-belt while driving, then sitting on the toilet is just like sitting while driving, then you should wear a seatbelt while sitting on the toilet and a face-mask while driving… “because science”.

The point here is that everything is in some way ‘like’ everything else, and differences make ALL the difference.

I propose the following new legislation: The Countering of Official Disinformation, Misinformation and Propaganda Bill. The proposed law aims to criminalise and impose jail terms of up to 20 years, and the forfeiture of private assets in excess of 1 million AUD, and the loss of any taxpayer funded parliamentary pensions, on any politician making claims that are contrary to scientific evidence or otherwise misleading that have or are likely to have caused widespread economic disadvantage, harm to health, or cause deaths of Australian citizens. Similar offences for media companies apply to the directors of the company and carry additional pecuniary penalties and compensations proportional to the harm caused. The law is to apply retrospectively. I propose that the first prosecution should focus on Health Ministers and Chief Health Officers who misrepresented Covid Deaths, coded according to the WHO guidelines that did not differentiate between deaths OF covid and deaths with Covid being only a contributing factor, or included coincidental covid infections at the time of death; or the health officials who have cited fraudulent research and ignored the evidence of safety to prohibit the use of Ivermectin for Covid; or the officials who misrepresented a handful (3) observational studies as the ‘best science’ on face masks while ignoring (15) high quality randomised controlled studies showing that face masks have no statistically significant effect on the spread of respiratory viruses in the general population, and failed to consider the evidence from developmental psychology on the harmful effect of face masks worn by adults on children, for criminal misinformation that cost lives, caused widespread trauma and suffering, and unprecedented economic harm to the Australian economy. If the following Bill has support, then my Bill should pass without any objections. https://minister.infrastructure.gov.au/fletcher/media-release/new-disinformation-laws

Here is a simple formula for improving the conditions of your existence: don’t behave like an animal. Ask yourself what would an animal do in your situation and do something else. If you act like an animal you can expect to be treated like an animal. Much of what is called ‘victimhood’ could be avoided this way.

The effect of our actions is primarily on ourselves; our actions affect our being more than they affect the world, and this in turn changes our relationship with the world.

The biggest weakness of the post-Christian, post-Jewish, post-Protestant ‘first world’ is that everyone pretends to care, that everyone feels compelled to pretend to care. This propensity for moral pretence, for fake compassion as a common means of self-validation, is the primary weakness exploited by the global revolutionaries. The cringeworthy and absurd causes of “ending violence against women and children”, “gender equality”, “climate justice”, “saving the planet” would have no effect in Africa, Russia or China. Consequently, different strategies of subjugation are used Africa, Russia and China.

If the innate human constitution, the natural state of human beings, poses a threat to your ‘human rights’, then your idea of human rights is inconsistent and false. You are essentially saying that human rights (of others) are a threat to (your) human rights. One could argue, by following your defective logic, that it is you who is a threat to human rights.

The human body is part of nature, but Humanity is not the body; we are the rational mind that acts through the body, conceives of the body as ‘my body’, and of the tree as ‘a tree’. The capacity to generate meaning has at first revealed nature as a prison, but as it grew more conscious of itself it became a key to freedom, revealing nature as something inferior and subordinate to consciousness.

The primary inconsistency of transhumanism is that it still conceives of humanity in terms of the body, tries to augment the natural body rather than transcend nature in principle, in meaning, and as such remains in this biophysical, archaic prison.

The recent antisemitic comments by Kayne West are so strange, so oddball (for a anointed corporate mega-entertainer) that I see only two plausible explanations:

A) The whole thing was a deep-fake, a new-style of marketing or shock advertising, and Kayne will be vindicated (or anonymously retired). This could also be intended to scare every other public personality into compliance by showing what can be done with this technology.

B) Kayne was ordered to make those comments by his corporate owners and guaranteed protection; he is designated to be the current political distraction, the current villain for the reality TV soap opera hungry masses, or some other psychological purpose.

One thing is sure, you are the captive audience and everything you see in the mass media is part of the show.

Yesterday in the Senate, I moved a motion calling on the minutes and any related correspondence relating to decisions made by National Cabinet regarding Covid be released.

Needless to say sleazy Albanese and the Greens voted against it.
😡

#auspol #australia #senatorgerardrennick #senatorrennick #gerardrennick #albanese #nationalcabinet

Email to Auditor-General of NSW, Margaret Crawford (21.10.2022)

I want to share with you a probable violation of workplace safety and my experience of trying to communicate it to WorkSafe and other regulatory agencies.

I have contacted several regulatory agencies (including Mr Gavrielatos at Safe Work NSW, SIRA and Safe Work Australia) with two questions relating to a possible conflict between Covid-19 vaccine mandates and workplace safety. I have received only generic responses; not one agency or person contacted has meaningfully answered my two questions, which were formulated as follows:

1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?

2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their mandatory participation?

When an employee is required to receive vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is economically coerced to participate in an activity where a percentage of employees are expected to die ‘in the course of employment’ as a direct result of the mandated activity. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical ethics and workplace safety. It may be objected that infectious pathogens also kill people, but these two categories of deaths are not ethically equivalent. Infection with a pathogen is not mandated, whereas deaths resulting from mandatory vaccination are mandated deaths, a ‘legalised’ killing of some people for the prospective benefit of the majority. Critically, Covid vaccine mandates applicable to employees amount to a violation of the right to life, because a small percentage of the targeted workforce are expected to die as a result of this coercive treatment.

I hope you will be able to address this important issue in the present audit.

Every aspect of nature is an idea, a concept, a meaning; otherwise it would not be meaningful to consciousness, therefore not discernible as anything at all. These ideas were generated collectively, socially, by the interacting instances of consciousness from the beginning of time. It follows that nature is part of humanity, a projection of the most socially integrated, ontologically inert, therefore oldest and most primitive constructs of consciousness. We depend on these constructs to ground ourselves as individual minds vis a vis one another, in the same world of relations, and in realising the logical hierarchy of creation we become conscious of consciousness itself being the creator. This is what I mean by consciousness ‘transcending’ nature.

The emerging view in psychiatric ethics is that involuntary medical treatment is unethical under any circumstances. A psychotic patient may be justifiably detained and isolated, but not forcibly injected. Even under the outdated model, the only plausible justification to forcibly medicate psychiatric patients was to re-establish their rational faculties, not to be used for the convenience or safety of other people if the patient’s faculties are consistent with what is considered normal in the general population. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0004867418810179

A curious quote from C.G. Jung

Remember? This is so retro..

Jacques Ellul

Do you know the facts? Have you decoded the narrative? Perhaps you were meant to decode it, earn the ‘hidden knowledge’ by your own effort, your own sacrifice; how else could you be expected to believe it.

Henry Kissinger, ‘The Meaning of History’ (1950)