Tribal morality is inherently tainted by the metaphysical distinction between “outside people” and “inside people”, two moral kinds. Crimes against humanity are invariably all symptoms of this primordial bug.

Reverse Catch-22

Let them sneer. Let them mock you, but don’t react. Their cheap reward will soon grow sour. Your exclusion, the difference, is your moral weapon. Once you remove the confrontation, the distraction, the underlying aberration become perceptible to them.

The treatment of indigenous people is a highly emotional issue in Australia. This emotional sensitivity was systemically cultivated for decades, and it permeates the education system and the public sector. It is also one of the primary narrative pathways/triggers for psychological operations during the Great Reset. For this reason, every crisis in this sphere should be regarded with emotional distance and evidential scepticism. Meanwhile, indigenous Australians have their own political agenda, their own tribal interests they have been cultivating for decades, and these too can be exploited to serve the Reset.

Suffering is not a problem; only meaningless suffering is a problem. There is a real moral hazard in the desire to “save” others from suffering without taking their own moral challenges into account; it can dehumanise others as victims of circumstances with no moral agency of their own, and this is the greatest possible wrong.

RE: STAND DOWN & JOBSEEKERS PAYMENT

Hey friends,

So I thought I'd make a post to help everyone out who are being (or have already been) "stood down" from their usual means of employment.

It seems that there's a lot of confusion around this term, as I've seen a few making posts that they have had issues claiming Centrelink payments due to separation certificates being requested, not being supplied by their employer etc.

There seems to be a misconception that being stood down means you have lost your job. I just wanted to point out that this is actually not the case. Yes, you have lost all income/shifts/wages for the time being, and your name may have disappeared from the roster... but you're technically still employed ⚠️

This is why it's SO important to NOT quit or leave your job under the threat of any of the current mandates/restrictions! Because this will severely change your eligibility to claim government welfare support, and create a bunch of massive hurdles, including extended delays to payment ennoscriptments.

So, for those who don't know or aren't sure, "stand down" is essentially the equivalent of unpaid leave, for an unspecified amount of time, because due to a situation out of your employer's hands (lockdowns, vaccine mandates etc) they cannot find an immediate use for you in your workplace. As such, when you are stood down, the business is not legally obligated to give you any shifts or pay you your minimum contracted hours.
This also removes any grounds for unfair dismissal or discrimination, since technically you're still employed by them - hence why most employers are using this means to "pause" staff during the Covid19 situation, because it also helps them to keep their noses clean. Unless they have specifically told you that your employment is being terminated, then you're just stood down - and they do legally need to give you reasonable notice of this as well.

Now, the good news is that you actually CAN claim Centrelink payments whilst stood down.

Here is how:
In your application for jobseekers payment, do NOT list that you're unemployed. This is actually not true, as you're just stood down for the time being. Do not provide them the misconception that your employment is (or has been) ended, as this is the incorrect information which causes hurdles and approval issues.
What you SHOULD put down is that you're currently employed, provide the average hours you typically work (ie. whilst not stood down) and supply your employers details, all the relevant information requested by them within the application.
Assuming all the other suitability criteria is met and your claim is approved, you'll be expected to report your earnings every fortnight.

Now the important bit... from the beginning of the period you are stood down from, you must record 0 hours worked, $0 income. This must reflect your actual situation, assuming that you are not receiving ANY income from your employment. Don't forget to also report your partner's earnings as well if need be, or any annual leave etc claimed - very important! - as this can affect the amount of payment you're legally ennoscriptd to.
This is the correct way to report income during employment stand down periods. If you don't have any other income affecting your fortnightly claim, then you should recieve the full rate of Jobseeker 👍
Anyone looking for more in-depth information on "Stand Down" from employment, there is heaps here:
https://au.indeed.com/caree.../career-development/stood-down
https://coronavirus.fairwork.gov.au/coronavirus-and-australian-workplace-laws/pay-leave-and-stand-downs/stand-downs

Cheers guys, and hope this info helps for the time being. Do not deny yourself the government income you're currently still ennoscriptd to, as it could very well be the means to help pay your rent or put food on the table 💖

The media and government are in terror of Sweden's performance. It shows them up as hardcore criminals - so, suddenly, there is complete silence in the media about Sweden. Last year not a day went by when they were not criticising Sweden. This year: SILENCE.

I have received an email from Dr. David Healy (psychopharmacologist and professor of psychiatry) with some of his stellar research into manipulation of evidence related to adverse events in clinical trials. I will ask for permission to post his draft report here. Meanwhile, please take a look at Dr Healy’s blog post examining just one case study: https://davidhealy.org/new-england-journal-of-misinformation/

SACRIFICING LITTLE ANGELS FOR GRANNY

The rights and needs of young people have been ignored in this crisis and this is a national and global disaster in the making. The future of our youngsters has been sacrificed in order to protect adults which goes against the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (article 3) states: “In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration”. The lockdown measures taken are not proportionate to the risks posed by the virus to young people.

https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/20523/html/

“If our treatments are marvellously effective and free of harms, it would be reasonable for those who run health services today to decide that prescribing could be done by much less expensive staff or technicians.” Dr. D. Healy. I would further suggest that Psychiatrists are getting paid $300 per hour to remind them not to bite the hand that “so generously” feeds them.

This is no doubt intentional, not a slip of the tongue. 👇

Integrity always wins. Dragons always perish.

Every jurisdictional flag, and every ritual, is a form of submission to some external agency, and therefore a denial of conscious, rational agency manifested in the Self, which is the only source of authority and value. Our moral status is validated solely through rational deliberation with others, as beings of the same kind. No flag can validate non-sense, and sense does not need a flag to signify or protect it, because sense is being. It stands in its own right, on 3 logical pillars which are One law of being.

Facial Recognition Profiling Begins at School.

Did your kids have their school photos taken this year? Did you read the terms and conditions under which these photos are taken? Do you know what happens to those high resolution digital image files after you purchase your prints? Are they deleted or someone gets to keep them? Who owns this data? If you did not check these details then your child is probably already on a facial recognition database. I have investigated this and one major company which is contracted to take photos in many public and private schools retains all photos indefinitely, “just in case you would want another copy anytime in the future”. Moreover, when contacted they refused to agree to delete photos if ordered to do so; your agreement to have your photos taken without the contract including explicit provisions prohibiting data retention (to which they refused to agree) appears to gives them artistic ownership. And this is legal, and if you do not read the fine print and see what is missing then you are part of the problem.

https://www.oaic.gov.au/updates/news-and-media/clearview-ai-breached-australians-privacy

This is a fascinating piece, a statement of the truth that immorality (which is fundamentally just internalised irrationality) leads to madness, nihilism, self-nihilation. I have once written that “only when everything is permitted we will find out who we really are, to what levels of depravity we are willing to stoop, or raise above. Only absolute moral freedom can reveal our moral essence, which is the cumulative effect of all our thoughts and actions... Through our actions we judge ourselves.” But there is also a trap here, a final seduction to draw the “truly righteous” to their doom: “The rage of the truly righteous will come and burn the fascists alive.” Is this not the very essence of fascism as defined in the same article, to believe that you are the “truly righteous” and that this gives you the authority to “burn the fascists alive” without metaphysical consequences? Every “golden age” grown from the seed of moral transgression will end in nihilism and destruction; this is the cycle of nature, still just smart-animal consciousness, irreflexive, but reflexive consciousness is above nature, it transcends nature. Man is a mirror. https://decider.com/2019/07/17/too-old-to-die-young-season-finale-recap/

Bangladesh, the most densely populated country on the planet, just recorded ZERO new covid cases in the last 24 hours. Only 21.8% of the population are fully vaccinated. https://greatgameindia.com/why-isnt-everyone-in-bangladesh-dead-from-covid/

A Personal Reminder

My responsibility is not to convince anyone of anything, but to be rational to the limit of my capacities; not to make any final determination but to sustain rational discourse in the face of fear, anxiety, pride and anger. My responsibity is to rational consciousness itself, and so is yours. Rational discourse is of itself a transformative experience, a tide that raises all boats.

Excellent research by Dr David Healy MD FRCPsych: https://rxisk.org/there-was-a-young-woman-who-swallowed-a-lie/ and here: https://davidhealy.org/the-eclipse-of-health-care/

My Email to Rod Barton MP (VIC) 01.12.2021

Dear Rod,

I have recently made the following submission to the Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee, arguing that the Pandemic Bill inappropriately delegates power and therefore will be Ultra Vires even if passed by the upper House. In summary, any Act purporting to make a delegation of power to temporarily rule by decree, be it by one man or by a group of committees, can never be lawful, because the parliament does not possess the constitutional authority to restrict our freedoms without first passing law on each specific restriction by a majority vote of both houses. A non-existent authority cannot be delegated or enacted. Please oppose this aberration. The future of Victoria is in your hands.


Public Submission to The Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee.

I am referring to the proposed PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLBEING AMENDMENT (PANDEMIC MANAGEMENT) BILL 2021 (henceforth, ‘The Bill’).

Dear members of the Committee,

I ask you to consider the following logical proof that The Bill inappropriately delegates legislative power.

Summary:

The Parliament of Victoria does not possess the constitutional authority to infringe on citizen freedoms without first passing a law to that effect by a majority vote in both Houses of Parliament. A non-existent authority cannot be delegated. Therefore, delegation of powers to limit citizen freedoms at the Government’s or Minister’s discretion is Ultra Vires.

In essence, the delegation of discretionary powers to infringe on citizen freedoms by any Act is void because it exceeds the procedural authority of the Parliament itself.

Analysis:

The principle of Ultra Vires was succinctly formulated by Justice Griffith in Sydney Municipal Council v Commonwealth, HCA 50 (26 April 1904): “... if the authority which assumes to create such a delegation does not itself possess the power, the delegation is void, since the spring cannot rise higher than its source.”

The legislative power in the State of Victoria is vested solely in the Parliament (s16, Constitution Act 1975), where the "Parliament" includes each House of the Parliament, the members of each House, the committees of each House and joint committees of both Houses (s94B.7). The only means of making legally binding restrictions on freedoms under the constitution is therefore by the majority vote of the Parliament.

The proposed Pandemic Management powers are essential a delegation of the constitutional authority to make legally binding restrictions on freedoms. If the delegation were not an extension of the legislative authority of the Parliment it would not have the force of law. Pandemic Management powers, once assumed, are exercised by the decree of the Minister.

The constitutional objection is that the Parliament does not have the authority to dispense with or bypass any element of the legislative process set in the Constitution (including the majority vote by both houses). The Parliament cannot delegate powers it does not itself possess, since a non-existent authority cannot be delegated; to affirm otherwise would be a violation of the law of non-contradiction, therefore a priori false. More formally, if X is a specific Parlimentary authority that is identical to the delegated authority X, then X=X, but if the the original authority does not exist, then not-X=X, therefore contradiction. Or simply, I cannot give you something that does not exist.

Any Act of Parliament that would purport to delegate powers that exceed the procedural limits of the Parliament itself is therefore Ultra Vires and Void.

Best Regards,

Michael Kowalik