Top insiders selling their own stocks at record rate in 2021. Is Deflation imminent?

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/01/ceos-and-insiders-sell-a-record-69-billion-of-their-stock.html

Ironically, Zero Hedge attempts to explain this sell-off as a reaction to inflation, which is of course absurd. You do not sell non-financial assets to hedge against inflation; you buy them, because when money loses purchasing power then the nominal stock valuations must go up. I interpret this sell-off as foreknowledge of future Deflation (an anticipated increase in the purchasing power of money due to a manufactured shrinkage in M3 money supply, ie in the availability of bank credit). This is just what has triggered the Great Depression, but today the ratio of M0/M3 (cash to bank account balances) is an order of magnitude smaller, so the deflationary collapse could be that much bigger, short of some monetary intervention by the central banks, which may indeed be just the plan (CBDCs). This interpretation dovetails with the appointment of the new, Soviet trained Prof. Saule Omarova as the United States Comptroller of the Currency:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/vipinbharathan/2021/11/21/saule-omarova-bidens-pick-for-the-occ-draws-fire-from-the-private-money-crowd/

And here is Omarova’s plan: “the complete migration of demand deposit accounts to the Fed’s balance sheet and explores the full range of new, more direct and flexible, monetary policy tools enabled by this shift. On the asset side, it advocates a comprehensive qualitative restructuring of the Fed’s investment portfolio, which would maximize its capacity to channel credit to productive uses in the nation’s economy.” Sure, some common sense ideas here, like the elimination of the fractional reserve banking, but these good ideas appear to be combined with total monetary surveillance, one blockchain to rule them all. In the face of the totalitarian overreach associated with Covid, this solution would be safe only if the use of cash were made a constitutionally protected right. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3715735 NOTE: As I am reading this paper it is clear that this is a policy of total control, engaging in systemic redistribution of wealth according to their judgement. I will have more comments on this shortly.

"4. Correlating unvaccinated mortality with vaccine roll out we see curious patterns (dotted line the proportion of people getting first and second doses). Why are the unvaccinated dying after NOT getting the 1st dose? Why are the single dosed dying after NOT getting the 2nd dose?

5.Plenty of evidence that the vaccinated who die within 14 days of vaccination may be categorized as unvaccinated. Then someone who dies within 14 days of first dose is miscategorised as unvaccinated and a similar thing could occur post second dose."

https://mobile.twitter.com/martinneil9/status/1466814347762671628?s=21

Awesome. If we just count all the ppl dying in the first 14 days after 1st dose quaxx, as 'unvaccinated', then magically unvaxxed deaths just jump beyond historic norms. Magically 🙃 safe if we don't count the deaths it causes!

Global Fascism will arrive wrapped in the rainbow flag, unleashing gender equality and climate justice at the spear-point of a syringe. ‘Inclusiveness’ and ‘leaving no one behind’ are finally revealed as euphemisms for mandatory participation: no one will be permitted to opt-out. Reimagine that.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/23216Together_2030__Position_Paper__HLPF_2019.pdf

https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

The snippet is from the manifesto of the Original Sovereign Tribal Federation. Any kind of “holy mandate” tribal-nationalism is classified as Right Wing extremism, as racial supremacism - a core feature of nazi ideology. They also claim to be your rulers. Beware. https://web.archive.org/web/20230616232942/http://ostf.weebly.com/ostf-declaration-of-sovereignty-and-nationhood.html

I am proudly unamputated.

Another ban, for posting the following in response to the recent lost appeal against vaccine mandates in NSW:

‘No lawyer as yet has argued that vaccine mandates violate the right to life by requiring employees to participate in an activity where a small percentage of them are expected to die as a result of their mandated participation; or that CHO general directives are Ultra Vires because even the parliament does not have the constitutional authority to make us do anything without passing a law to that specific effect by a majority vote of both houses. https://news.1rj.ru/str/NormalParty/628’

Now why would a champion of your rights and freedoms, a lawyer purporting to defend you from vaccine mandates, do such a thing?

NCIRS and NSW Health – Falsehoods of the NSW Delta Outbreak
A comprehensive deconstruction of the falsehoods created and propagandised by the NCIRS and NSW Health report on the NSW Delta outbreak.
In any other industry, or for any other scenario, this report would be withdrawn and the authors extensively counselled.
It is clear that impartiality was not the driver of the NCIRS/NSW Health report; rather an opportunity to fit the numbers to the predetermined narrative.
And if the main stream media actually cared about upholding their civil duty, and their special place in society and legal protections, they would investigate these egregious falsehoods and demand answers of Hazzard and Chant.
Clearly this would be at odds with the narrative being peddled, the need to stigmatise the vaccine-free, and the coercion to vaccinate.

We know that Covid vaccines kill a small percentage of healthy people, and it cannot be medically predicted who will die as a direct result of Covid vaccination. This is a sufficient medical reason for doctors to give medical exemptions to anyone, within the rules established by AHPRA.

The global supply chain crisis is entering a new stage. Note how nobody is talking about the simplest, most obvious solution: changing the regulations to allow diesel vehicles to operate without Urea additive, for as long as the Emergency persists. Vehicles can be easily retuned to run without it, and the only reason urea is used is because it is required by law to control emissions. Also, the world is not using any more urea this year than it did in 2019 (probably much less, due to Covid restrictions), so the supply shortage is also manufactured; the production is intentionally limited and supplies are withheld to achieve precisely this outcome. The lack of discussion about these facts is the strongest evidence to date that our Government and Mass Media are colluding with China, and are intentionally working to destroy the supply chain, or at least to create more panic. Never attribute to incompetence that which is adequately explained by malice.

These are not ‘slips of the tongue’. This is a consciousness filter.

“I appreciate greatly the work done by all the premiers and chief ministers and seeing those national vaccination rates get to where they are. We've got one more state to get through that gate as it's a bit like, you know, getting the sheep through the gate and into the run and we’ve got one more state to get through and we're looking forward to that happening in the next few days.” Scott Morrison, PM.

What happens at the end of the “run”?

https://www.pm.gov.au/media/press-conference-dummoyne-nsw

The greatest resource on Earth is human will, human action. Whoever moves the will of the masses, rules the Earth. Everything that strongly motivates the masses to move, to re-act, is likely intentional. Nevertheless, ‘doing nothing’ can also be a movement of the will, a provocation of passivity.

Gaslighting is the primary strategy of political psychopaths and fascists. They don’t argue with evidence but presume that their target group is unquestionably morally wrong, defective, and accuse that group of precisely the psychological traits that the psychopath himself manifests. This is a spontaneous form of diversion from their own psychopathology, which is also a manifestation of the same psychopathology; unrestrained Freudian projection. We should never blindly trust experts, because some of them (perhaps most of them) are psychopaths.

How to become more Human:

- accept that you do not belong anywhere,
- assume that there are no likeminded people,
(you just have not realised your disagreements yet),
- acknowledge that you have no tribe,
- accept that you are probably wrong about most things,
- but you need others to make sense of it all.

That is a good place to start.

By acquiescing to vaccine coercion you take away the right to free medical consent from future generations, and without that right they will have no rights at all, because every other right can be medically subverted.

My email to Vice Chancellor of Griffith University (QLD) 12.12.2021

Dear Prof. Evans,

I am a philosopher of ethics with my current research-focus on vaccine mandates. I have recently published in the BMJ on this topic: https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/25/medethics-2020-107026. It came to my attention that Griffith University will impose mandatory vaccination policy for staff and students in 2022, with the option to regularly undergo antigen testing instead of vaccination. The option to undergo testing, which is then also a mandated medical procedure, mitigates but does not negate the coercive effect of the vaccination mandate, where the following ethical issues arise:

1. Vaccine mandates imply that all humans are born in a defective, inherently harmful state that must be biotechnologically augmented to allow their unrestricted participation in society, and this constitutes discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate characteristics of the human race.

2. Covid vaccines are known to occasionally cause deaths of healthy people. When an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is being economically coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die ‘in the course of employment’ as a direct result of their mandatory participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical ethics and workplace safety. It may be objected that Covid-19 also kills people, but these two categories of deaths are not ethically equivalent. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not mandated, whereas deaths resulting from mandatory vaccination are mandated deaths, a legalised killing of some people for the alleged benefit of the majority.

3. Medical consent must be free - not coerced - in order to be valid. Any discrimination against the unvaccinated is economic or social opportunity coercion, precluding the possibility of a valid medical consent. The right to free, uncoerced medical consent is not negotiable, because without it we have no rights at all; every other right can be subverted by medical coercion.

I also object to the assertion made by several state premiers and other politicians that the people who are discriminated against are “unvaccinated by choice”. Apart from the fact that social and economic opportunity coercion removes our free choice in this matter, being unvaccinated is fundamentally not a choice; we were born this way. The premise of being “unvaccinated by choice” is as absurd as “having two hands by choice”. The right to preserve our innate characteristics without being discriminated against is paramount.

Regards,

Michael Kowalik


Vice Chancellor’s response 13.12.2021:

Dear Michael

Thank you for your feedback.

This is not an easy decision to make and we realise it is one where people have strong views. Throughout the pandemic, Griffith University has been guided by the principle of taking all reasonable measures to reduce the risk of members of our community becoming ill.

While vaccines do not completely eliminate the risk of contracting COVID-19, the scientific evidence is clear that people who are vaccinated are much less likely to both contract COVID themselves and pass it on to others. This policy therefore is one of a range of measures to keep Griffith as safe a place as possible to study and work.

Allowing a testing regime as an alternative to vaccination creates an option for staff and students who are not able or willing to be vaccinated. Under this policy, no-one will be required to be vaccinated but everyone will be required to take steps to help protect the health and safety of others.

I am sorry that you do not agree with the stance that we have taken.

Kind regards

Office of the Vice Chancellor and President


See comments for my response.