How to be an ethical patient
When you require routine medical care, I suggest asking to be seen by an unvaccinated doctor, and not by someone who is unvaccinated on the basis of a medical exemption but out of principle. How could you feel safe with a doctor who acquiesced to medical coercion? Why would you put your wellbeing into the hands of a doctor who denied you the right to free medical consent? How could you ever trust a doctor who took away the right to free medical consent from their own children and from future generations? Without that fundamental right they will have no rights at all, because every other right can be circumvented by medical coercion. Have you ever seen what governments throughout history did to people?
When you require routine medical care, I suggest asking to be seen by an unvaccinated doctor, and not by someone who is unvaccinated on the basis of a medical exemption but out of principle. How could you feel safe with a doctor who acquiesced to medical coercion? Why would you put your wellbeing into the hands of a doctor who denied you the right to free medical consent? How could you ever trust a doctor who took away the right to free medical consent from their own children and from future generations? Without that fundamental right they will have no rights at all, because every other right can be circumvented by medical coercion. Have you ever seen what governments throughout history did to people?
The government (all governments) lied about Covid deaths from the start, by misrepresenting a non-standard measure of ‘deaths with Covid’ as ‘deaths of Covid’. The government (all governments) continue to lie and insist they are not lying (despite their own official documents proving that they lie about Covid deaths). Why would you trust anything they say after that?
Where to from here?
Where does the government get the authority to govern you if you do not consent to be governed ‘by them’, because you have no trust or respect left ‘for them’? So why are governments all around the world working so hard to discredit themselves, to destroy any remnant of public trust in their institutions? There are 2 logical possibilities that I can think of: A) they want us to rebel in order to consent to a new (revolutionary) form of government, B) they want us to accept that most will not rebel no matter what the government will do to us, that we would accept an evil government before having no government at all.
Consequences of A:
If we all rebel we would still need to maintain social structure, therefore pro-actively contract with one another, and develop means of contract enforcement, ie, a new mechanism of governance. But the absence of government does not entail absence of organised power, which undermines the capacity to contract on equitable terms. For example, how can a hungry, unemployed individual contract with Westfarmers or Amazon? They can only become a slave. The same applies to democratic elections held in times of anarchy, which are also a form of contract about ideas and promises, and these can only come from those who hold the most power to present themselves as guardians of public order. So, this scenario seems to lead towards corporatocracy.
Consequences of B:
If we do not rebel but acquiesce to absurdity and the rule by decree, then the same ultimate outcome is achieved, but grudgingly, without enthusiasm, like slaves, which is possibly a poor outcome for management who desire productive efficiency and control. Enthusiasm, being always somewhat delusional, is easier to direct than passive aggression and disillusionment, but disillusionment involves introspection, learning, searching for more, for transcendence, but also vulnerable to turn into burst of delusional enthusiasm about hopes, or a destructive frenzy.
So what do you think? Which option offers better long term promise for humanity?
Where does the government get the authority to govern you if you do not consent to be governed ‘by them’, because you have no trust or respect left ‘for them’? So why are governments all around the world working so hard to discredit themselves, to destroy any remnant of public trust in their institutions? There are 2 logical possibilities that I can think of: A) they want us to rebel in order to consent to a new (revolutionary) form of government, B) they want us to accept that most will not rebel no matter what the government will do to us, that we would accept an evil government before having no government at all.
Consequences of A:
If we all rebel we would still need to maintain social structure, therefore pro-actively contract with one another, and develop means of contract enforcement, ie, a new mechanism of governance. But the absence of government does not entail absence of organised power, which undermines the capacity to contract on equitable terms. For example, how can a hungry, unemployed individual contract with Westfarmers or Amazon? They can only become a slave. The same applies to democratic elections held in times of anarchy, which are also a form of contract about ideas and promises, and these can only come from those who hold the most power to present themselves as guardians of public order. So, this scenario seems to lead towards corporatocracy.
Consequences of B:
If we do not rebel but acquiesce to absurdity and the rule by decree, then the same ultimate outcome is achieved, but grudgingly, without enthusiasm, like slaves, which is possibly a poor outcome for management who desire productive efficiency and control. Enthusiasm, being always somewhat delusional, is easier to direct than passive aggression and disillusionment, but disillusionment involves introspection, learning, searching for more, for transcendence, but also vulnerable to turn into burst of delusional enthusiasm about hopes, or a destructive frenzy.
So what do you think? Which option offers better long term promise for humanity?
Vaccine mandates are a Devil’s bargain
Vaccine mandates are coercive conditions that are expected to result in a small percentage of healthy people dying from the vaccine. Any discrimination against the unvaccinated violates the right to life of some people; it is a legalised killing of a minority for the prospective benefit of the majority. There is of course a catch in this bargain: when you agree to take away the right to life from anyone else, you also implicitly take it away from yourself and from your own children, and perhaps the next government will sacrifice your child for the Greater Good, for the benefit of the majority. It is a devil’s bargain.
Vaccine mandates are coercive conditions that are expected to result in a small percentage of healthy people dying from the vaccine. Any discrimination against the unvaccinated violates the right to life of some people; it is a legalised killing of a minority for the prospective benefit of the majority. There is of course a catch in this bargain: when you agree to take away the right to life from anyone else, you also implicitly take it away from yourself and from your own children, and perhaps the next government will sacrifice your child for the Greater Good, for the benefit of the majority. It is a devil’s bargain.
The argument that Covid was never a real emergency is not a viable defence against tyranny
They lied about the severity of Covid, creating the illusion of a plague out of something on par with the flu and the common cold, but I consider this of secondary importance. Even if the pandemic were real, with unprecedented lethality, all the discriminatory actions of the government would still be unethical and illegal. And this is what concerns me the most. A real emergency, a catastrophe, would not change the fact that discrimination against the unvaccinated, vaccine passports or mandatory masks are morally wrong, for many reasons frequently discussed on this channel. If we would focus only on showing that Covid pandemic was not a real emergency, the next pandemic would still leaves us open to the same abuses.
If Australians have to suffer another 4 years of hell before they figure this out for themselves, then so be it. Suffering is a lesson. No use in saving people from suffering under the guise of a fake pandemic if they will endorse gulags when a real pandemic comes.
They lied about the severity of Covid, creating the illusion of a plague out of something on par with the flu and the common cold, but I consider this of secondary importance. Even if the pandemic were real, with unprecedented lethality, all the discriminatory actions of the government would still be unethical and illegal. And this is what concerns me the most. A real emergency, a catastrophe, would not change the fact that discrimination against the unvaccinated, vaccine passports or mandatory masks are morally wrong, for many reasons frequently discussed on this channel. If we would focus only on showing that Covid pandemic was not a real emergency, the next pandemic would still leaves us open to the same abuses.
If Australians have to suffer another 4 years of hell before they figure this out for themselves, then so be it. Suffering is a lesson. No use in saving people from suffering under the guise of a fake pandemic if they will endorse gulags when a real pandemic comes.
“Professor insists there is no ethical reason stopping doctors from aborting kids at any time post-birth without parental approval.”
The above headline is a parody of the argument made by Prof. Massie: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10446567/Covid-Australia-Aussie-children-legally-vaccinated-against-parents-wishes.html, but if we acquiesce to medical coercion, especially where death is a possible outcome (as is the case of Covid vaccine mandates), we open ourselves to any violation of rights, including the right to life, including the killing of your children, in the alleged interest of the greater good.
The above headline is a parody of the argument made by Prof. Massie: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10446567/Covid-Australia-Aussie-children-legally-vaccinated-against-parents-wishes.html, but if we acquiesce to medical coercion, especially where death is a possible outcome (as is the case of Covid vaccine mandates), we open ourselves to any violation of rights, including the right to life, including the killing of your children, in the alleged interest of the greater good.
News Corp is really scrapping the bottom of the barrel to push the narrative that most Canadians support vaccine mandates. This tweet by “Bubs”, cited by https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/at-work/canadian-truckies-in-freedom-convoy-over-mandatory-jab-rule/news-story/b0a3960c1d3439dbd757a4db01669df8 got the grand total of, wait for it... 4 LIKES.
Interesting, faith leaders are not required to be vaccinated, but they still enforce vaccination mandates on their staff, volunteers and contractors. Source: https://www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au/covidsafe-religion-and-ceremonies-guidance
Nobody has the moral duty to prevent natural deaths (this is optional, as any doctor who plays golf knows all too well). Our moral duty is only not to kill intentionally, irrespective of the benefits to others.
Attention Doctors!
Every medical practitioner who remains registered with AHPRA and complies with the vaccine mandates will in time have to prove how they covertly resisted this crime against humanity, or they will be liable for complicity. Any medical practitioner who went beyond the mandates and applied medical coercion by discriminating against unvaccinated patients is openly complicit and therefore guilty beyond any reasonable defence.
Every medical practitioner who remains registered with AHPRA and complies with the vaccine mandates will in time have to prove how they covertly resisted this crime against humanity, or they will be liable for complicity. Any medical practitioner who went beyond the mandates and applied medical coercion by discriminating against unvaccinated patients is openly complicit and therefore guilty beyond any reasonable defence.
Unvaccinated employees permitted where vacancy cannot be filled by vaccinated person.
https://www.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-01/Pandemic-COVID-19-Mandatory-Vaccination-Specified-Facilities-Order-2022-No-3-pdf.pdf
https://www.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-01/Pandemic-COVID-19-Mandatory-Vaccination-Specified-Facilities-Order-2022-No-3-pdf.pdf
On the other hand, applying for these jobs👆could be counterproductive, by concealing the magnitude of non-compliance with the unethical mandates. It would make the government look better on paper and allow them more time to find your replacement overseas. So I would suggest that unless you are desperate you should not apply for these jobs but leave these industries critically understaffed, making the magnitude of the crime and our ethical non-compliance fully visible to the brainwashed masses.
“Consent cannot be mandated, by definition.” https://zeroanthropology.net/2021/08/20/statement-of-non-compliance-with-mandatory-vaccination-in-canadian-universities/
ZERO ANTHROPOLOGY
Statement of Non-Compliance with Mandatory Vaccination in Canadian Universities
First it was not even a university, but Seneca College. Then it was the University of Ottawa. Then Carleton University, the University of Western Ontario, and the University of Toronto. Now it is a…
When making an emergency call for an ambulance we ought to specify that we only consent to being cared for by unvaccinated and unmasked medical practitioners, and everyone else should not come into contact with or interact with us in any way. The reason: nobody else can be trusted to act ethically. I suspect they would have to call in one of their unvaxxed lay offs under the health emergency exception.
My answer to Why do so many people think getting the vaccine is worse than getting covid 19? https://www.quora.com/Why-do-so-many-people-think-getting-the-vaccine-is-worse-than-getting-covid-19/answer/Michael-Kowalik-5
Quora
Why do so many people think getting the vaccine is worse than getting covid 19?
Answer (1 of 85): Anyone getting any injection can have an adverse reaction to a foreign substance being put into their body. Some are allergic to strawberries and can have mild to life threatening reaction. Any medical professional will admit this. It is…