When a handful of people write letters of demand “from the Australian People”, without being asked to do so by you, they misrepresent both you and themselves. They certainly do not represent me, they could never represent me, and I ask them not to purport to speak on my behalf.

Remember this:👇

Don’t forget that both communist and fascist regimes were accomplished by popular street protests, just hard working, simple people fighting against evil, defending what is good and morally right, right? This is what they too believed. You know propaganda works, but you still believe the propaganda, because propaganda works. Everyone can be manipulated to various degrees, so always ask yourself, how are they playing you? Crucially, when you are a follower, when you follow leaders, you will sometimes be on the right side of history, but mostly on the wrong side, no matter how genuine and convincing your leaders are. So this is primarily a problem of methodology; don’t be a follower. Don’t expect solutions or answers from others but think, take full moral responsibility for your own judgements and actions. Nobody is coming to save you because nobody else can. You must not follow my advise.

The herd instinct is dangerous. When in an emotionally galvanised crowd it is nearly impossible to think as an individual, not without lifetime of training. The collective unconscious takes over, and this is a dangerous, often highly destructive, intoxicating, irrational, even cataclysmic state. The rulers were exploiting this phenomenon since times immemorial, to our collective peril.

“The government places safety above all else, as it has done throughout the pandemic, and will continue to follow the medical advice in protecting Australians. People under 16 years of age will continue to be considered ‘up to date’ after completing their primary course of vaccination, while severely immunocompromised people aged five years and older require a third primary dose to remain up to date.” Because killing a few people for the safety of others, and taking away the right to free medical consent from the entire population, is what safety is all about, right?

As I said. The seeds were sown, and there will be a harvest.

A huge, informal report on the dangers of Covid-19 vaccination, including a lot of scientific and circumstantial evidence. For those who like data analysis. https://www.skirsch.com/covid/VaccineEssentials.pdf

The primary weapon used against you in psychological warfare are your own emotions.

The right to free medical consent is paramount, because every other right can be medically subverted under the guise of emergency. We have the moral duty to preserve the right to free medical consent for our children by rejecting every medical procedure that is mandated or otherwise associated with social or economic coercion.

If there were no “antivaxers” then the government would have to invent them. The reason for this is that the perpetrators of the Reset need the vaccinated (ie damaged) population to perceive a moral adversary with respect to whom they can assume higher moral ground. If the “antivaxxers” did nothing for a year, said nothing, raised no concerns, just watched silently, the vaccinated would psychologically self-combust. The government knows this. I suggest that the antivax movement is intentionally provoked by the government for this purpose, that our outrage serves their purpose. It is our time to be silent and humbly oppressed, a time to patiently endure, but this too will pass.

Some people assume that “spirituality” is necessarily a good thing. No, spirituality is value neutral, it has good and bad sides just like everything else. The only Good is to do what is morally right, and this is independent of spirituality, which is currently just another trap, another “temptation” to make you do wrong under the guise of the good. For the record, I met some spiritual masters in my time, and they have never, not once, discussed or alluded to spirituality as a worthwhile pursuit. It is almost as if the very reference to spirituality as a personal pursuit is already a confession that one is utterly lacking it, and therefore craving it as a token of value, without knowing it. As Tolstoy said, “people do not want God but only miracles”, and they confuse the capacity to experience miracles with the capacity to experience God.

A list of non-protest type activities that could be effective in raising public awareness about the the moral cost of vaccine mandates:

A) a marathon in memory of the victims of vaccine mandates;

B) a bicycle race across Australia in memory of the human right to free medical consent;

C) a chess tournament for the cure against medical tyranny;

D) a children’s drawing/painting competition in the honour of those who did not acquiesce to the removal of the right to free medical consent from their children and future generations.

The Minister for Health and Aged Care has responded to my petition/argument opposing mandatory vaccination (https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN2939). Minister’s response is published here: https://epetitions.aph.gov.au/api/MinisterialResponse/download?id=EN2939 I want to remind the Minister that the Government and the Parliament do not have the legal authority or moral right to arbitrarily kill some people for the benefit of the many, and no utilitarian argument can change this absolute fact. Vaccine mandates violate the right to life.

The Minister for Health and Aged Care has responded to my petition/argument (https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN2988), in which I refute the official justification for the declaration of the State of Emergency. Minister’s response is published here: https://epetitions.aph.gov.au/api/MinisterialResponse/download?id=EN2988 The Ministers fails to address in his repose the official statistic from the U.K., where more people died of respiratory illness (being the underlying cause) in 2018 than in 2020 (UK). The Minister also misrepresents the official count of “Covid deaths” (defined by the WHO as deaths where Covid is included anywhere on the death certificate, even if it is not the underlying cause of death) as deaths where Covid was the underlying cause (the standard measure of mortality for every other illness).

How to become more Human:

- accept that you do not belong anywhere,
- assume that there are no likeminded people,
(you just have not realised your disagreements yet),
- acknowledge that you have no tribe,
- accept that you are probably wrong about most things,
- but you need others to make sense of it all.

That is a good place to start.

The pursuit of Spirituality is a manifestation of the urge for dependency (‘Basic assumption Dependency’ or BaD in Socioanalytic terminology) on what Lacan called the Big Other, reduced to its primordial essence. This primordial dependency can then be easily transformed into political dependency, directed towards totalitarian ends. From socioanalytic perspective, the pursuit of spirituality is an intermediate stage of totalitarian transformation, the state of the ashes from which the Phoenix of New political control is to rise, a New Order of dependency. I strongly advise everyone here to read Experiences in Groups by Wilfred Bion, which elucidates the primordial group dynamics and their pathological/destructive states, BaD, BaP, BaF: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2279297.Experiences_in_Groups

Why would most doctors collude in crimes against humanity.

When we challenge ideas or beliefs that underpin someone’s position in the social hierarchy we are implicitly attacking the structure that protects them from existential anxiety, which of itself triggers existential anxiety. This constitutes a powerful psychological mechanism for the preservation of the ideas or beliefs on which the hierarchy depends, irrespective of those ideas being provably false. Social hierarchies and the associated rewards can therefore be constructed in such a way as to psychologically incentivise the preservation of false ideas. For example, very few doctors will dispute the safety or the benefits of any “public health measures” approved by the regulators, because the privileged position of doctors in the social hierarchy is conditional on the superior quality and trust on the system of regulatory oversight and accreditation.