A list of non-protest type activities that could be effective in raising public awareness about the the moral cost of vaccine mandates:
A) a marathon in memory of the victims of vaccine mandates;
B) a bicycle race across Australia in memory of the human right to free medical consent;
C) a chess tournament for the cure against medical tyranny;
D) a children’s drawing/painting competition in the honour of those who did not acquiesce to the removal of the right to free medical consent from their children and future generations.
A) a marathon in memory of the victims of vaccine mandates;
B) a bicycle race across Australia in memory of the human right to free medical consent;
C) a chess tournament for the cure against medical tyranny;
D) a children’s drawing/painting competition in the honour of those who did not acquiesce to the removal of the right to free medical consent from their children and future generations.
The Minister for Health and Aged Care has responded to my petition/argument opposing mandatory vaccination (https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN2939). Minister’s response is published here: https://epetitions.aph.gov.au/api/MinisterialResponse/download?id=EN2939 I want to remind the Minister that the Government and the Parliament do not have the legal authority or moral right to arbitrarily kill some people for the benefit of the many, and no utilitarian argument can change this absolute fact. Vaccine mandates violate the right to life.
The Minister for Health and Aged Care has responded to my petition/argument (https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN2988), in which I refute the official justification for the declaration of the State of Emergency. Minister’s response is published here: https://epetitions.aph.gov.au/api/MinisterialResponse/download?id=EN2988 The Ministers fails to address in his repose the official statistic from the U.K., where more people died of respiratory illness (being the underlying cause) in 2018 than in 2020 (UK). The Minister also misrepresents the official count of “Covid deaths” (defined by the WHO as deaths where Covid is included anywhere on the death certificate, even if it is not the underlying cause of death) as deaths where Covid was the underlying cause (the standard measure of mortality for every other illness).
Forwarded from Normal (Michael Kowalik)
How to become more Human:
- accept that you do not belong anywhere,
- assume that there are no likeminded people,
(you just have not realised your disagreements yet),
- acknowledge that you have no tribe,
- accept that you are probably wrong about most things,
- but you need others to make sense of it all.
That is a good place to start.
- accept that you do not belong anywhere,
- assume that there are no likeminded people,
(you just have not realised your disagreements yet),
- acknowledge that you have no tribe,
- accept that you are probably wrong about most things,
- but you need others to make sense of it all.
That is a good place to start.
The pursuit of Spirituality is a manifestation of the urge for dependency (‘Basic assumption Dependency’ or BaD in Socioanalytic terminology) on what Lacan called the Big Other, reduced to its primordial essence. This primordial dependency can then be easily transformed into political dependency, directed towards totalitarian ends. From socioanalytic perspective, the pursuit of spirituality is an intermediate stage of totalitarian transformation, the state of the ashes from which the Phoenix of New political control is to rise, a New Order of dependency. I strongly advise everyone here to read Experiences in Groups by Wilfred Bion, which elucidates the primordial group dynamics and their pathological/destructive states, BaD, BaP, BaF: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2279297.Experiences_in_Groups
Goodreads
Experiences in Groups: And Other Papers by Wilfred R. Bion
Experiences in Groups book. Read 9 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. A classic study which, by synthesizing the approaches of psych...
Why would most doctors collude in crimes against humanity.
When we challenge ideas or beliefs that underpin someone’s position in the social hierarchy we are implicitly attacking the structure that protects them from existential anxiety, which of itself triggers existential anxiety. This constitutes a powerful psychological mechanism for the preservation of the ideas or beliefs on which the hierarchy depends, irrespective of those ideas being provably false. Social hierarchies and the associated rewards can therefore be constructed in such a way as to psychologically incentivise the preservation of false ideas. For example, very few doctors will dispute the safety or the benefits of any “public health measures” approved by the regulators, because the privileged position of doctors in the social hierarchy is conditional on the superior quality and trust on the system of regulatory oversight and accreditation.
When we challenge ideas or beliefs that underpin someone’s position in the social hierarchy we are implicitly attacking the structure that protects them from existential anxiety, which of itself triggers existential anxiety. This constitutes a powerful psychological mechanism for the preservation of the ideas or beliefs on which the hierarchy depends, irrespective of those ideas being provably false. Social hierarchies and the associated rewards can therefore be constructed in such a way as to psychologically incentivise the preservation of false ideas. For example, very few doctors will dispute the safety or the benefits of any “public health measures” approved by the regulators, because the privileged position of doctors in the social hierarchy is conditional on the superior quality and trust on the system of regulatory oversight and accreditation.
Shadow of Nature
The concept of Nature typically signifies every aspect of physical existence that was not constructed by Humans. I have come to the conclusion that Nature is one of several forms of the psychological archetype of the Big Other, besides God and Government, and is the focus of our socially-pathological instinct for dependency (W. R. Bion), probably a nostalgia for the lost comfort and safety of the womb (Klein, M. “Envy and Gratitude.” The Hogarth Press, 1987 p64) We tend to mystify nature as a kind of ideal agency with terms like Mother Nature, the source, we assert (falsely) that nature gives us everything we need, and we eagerly embrace the quasi-religious (and provably inconsistent) dogma that nature (this Big Other) must be protected, “preserved”, returned to “health”, implying that there is an “original state” we should aim to reclaim (an analogy of the Womb). Then all wrongs would be resolved, but it is trivially true that “there is nothing wrong” in a sensory deprivation chamber, or when reflexive consciousness (our otherness) is no more, or when you are dead. Nature symbolises the death-drive, an escape from the reflexive consciousness that hurts... therefore nihilism. It is then no coincidence that both Satanism and Nazism (known historical death cults) are understood as militant forms of paganism/animism, which in turn makes the unconscious cycles of Nature rather than Consciousness its Big Other, its God, and unconsciously works towards self-effacement. Nature worship is the path of metaphysical suicide, a contradiction that effaces itself because it cannot bear its own growth pains, and so it implicitly negates and defiles its own ideal - Nature, which serves pain to consciousness.
Nature is unconscious, blind and aimless. It knows neither love nor hate, neither right nor wrong, and its entire value and meaning are endowments of rational consciousness. The environment must be respected not because nature has value in itself, but because we have the moral duty (and it is ultimately in our self-interest) not to deprive other rational beings of its resources. If rational consciousness (i.e. Humanity) were not the highest value then nature would have no value, or meaning, or sense.
The concept of Nature typically signifies every aspect of physical existence that was not constructed by Humans. I have come to the conclusion that Nature is one of several forms of the psychological archetype of the Big Other, besides God and Government, and is the focus of our socially-pathological instinct for dependency (W. R. Bion), probably a nostalgia for the lost comfort and safety of the womb (Klein, M. “Envy and Gratitude.” The Hogarth Press, 1987 p64) We tend to mystify nature as a kind of ideal agency with terms like Mother Nature, the source, we assert (falsely) that nature gives us everything we need, and we eagerly embrace the quasi-religious (and provably inconsistent) dogma that nature (this Big Other) must be protected, “preserved”, returned to “health”, implying that there is an “original state” we should aim to reclaim (an analogy of the Womb). Then all wrongs would be resolved, but it is trivially true that “there is nothing wrong” in a sensory deprivation chamber, or when reflexive consciousness (our otherness) is no more, or when you are dead. Nature symbolises the death-drive, an escape from the reflexive consciousness that hurts... therefore nihilism. It is then no coincidence that both Satanism and Nazism (known historical death cults) are understood as militant forms of paganism/animism, which in turn makes the unconscious cycles of Nature rather than Consciousness its Big Other, its God, and unconsciously works towards self-effacement. Nature worship is the path of metaphysical suicide, a contradiction that effaces itself because it cannot bear its own growth pains, and so it implicitly negates and defiles its own ideal - Nature, which serves pain to consciousness.
Nature is unconscious, blind and aimless. It knows neither love nor hate, neither right nor wrong, and its entire value and meaning are endowments of rational consciousness. The environment must be respected not because nature has value in itself, but because we have the moral duty (and it is ultimately in our self-interest) not to deprive other rational beings of its resources. If rational consciousness (i.e. Humanity) were not the highest value then nature would have no value, or meaning, or sense.
Some human rights lawyers assert that there is a delicate balance between the right to life of those who may be exposed to covid and consequently die and the freedom of conscience of those who refuse vaccination. This is back to front. Human rights are there to limit the actions of governments, not the state of nature, and any mandate of the government that would coerce people to participate in an activity (vaccination) where some people are expected to die for the benefit of others is of itself an absolute violation of their right to life. On the flip side of the alleged “delicate balance”, the government is not responsible for acts of nature, or of anyone else’s acts for that matter; they are only responsible for the consequences of their own mandates. No person or group has ever been accused of crimes against humanity for doing nothing, but only for doing something that directly and intentionally violated human rights.
Anyone who calls their democratic representative a “leader” (rather than a follower of the will of the people), is either opposed to “representative democracy” or is aware that democracy is not really about representation but about saving face when submitting to the ruling power.
Kids who were coerced to wear face masks will eventually grow up and turn on the people who did this to them.
It is impossible to free people who do not want to be freed. Freeing people against their will is not freedom but tyranny.
The footage suggests that at some time, somewhere, something was blown up by someone. Everything else is speculation.
Rest assured that whomever the global banking cartel has nominated to win the war, will win the war.
Joe Hildebrand implies that his acquiescence to the taking away of the right to free medical consent from our children and future generations is not only legitimate but a moral obligation, if you (like him) disapprove of the admittedly unreasonable lockdowns. Another way, if you refuse to sacrifice the freedom of your children to the government, and if you are not willing to sacrifice the lives of the few for the temporary benefit of the many, then you are “recalcitrant”, selfish “hypocrites”. There are three possibilities that I can see here: a) Joe has not learned from history what happens when people lose the right to free medical consent, or b) he knows, but wants to cause harm, c) he is playing a villain to teach you something and to help you discover the right reasons for disagreeing with him. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/proof-covid-antivaxxers-have-totally-missed-the-point/news-story/1a80b32bf49d22fe0cdb7638f2b98b0a
news
Glaring hypocrisy anti-vaxxers can’t grasp
OPINION
If you think that my efforts documented here are objectively valuable or directly beneficial to your interests, if I am doing something for you that you cannot do as effectively, then please consider making a donation. What you see on this channel is not whipped up at the spur of the moment but is backed by 30 years of hard study. Moreover, maintaining the quality and relevance of the arguments takes a lot of research, a lot of time that could be invested in leisure or paid work. Thank You if you have already contributed. https://ko-fi.com/michaelkowalik
Ko-fi
Buy Michael Kowalik a Coffee. ko-fi.com/michaelkowalik
Become a supporter of Michael Kowalik today! ❤️ Ko-fi lets you support the creators you love with no fees on donations.
People are more likely to oppose the oppression and injustice in distant countries than to defend the freedom of their own children. There are three possible causes of this bias: a) the effectiveness of local public diplomacy (propaganda) convinces the oppressed that they are free and the local oppressive measures are justifiable; b) it takes less courage to confront unjust situations where one does not have skin in the game, than those where the state apparatus can inflict immediate punishment for insubordination; c) the state propaganda may intentionally divert public outrage from local oppression towards the oppression of distant others.