Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Europe has been FREELOADING off American defense, but pretending Greenland is "theirs"
"They cannot defend Greenland! It's unfair to the American taxpayer who has SUBSIDIZED all of Europe's defense for generations now!"
"American dollars, American treasure, American blood, American ingenuity is what keeps Europe safe and the free world safe. And Donald Trump's insisting that we be respected!"
"They cannot control the territory of Greenland. Under every understanding of law that has existed about territorial control for 500 years to control a territory, you have to be able to defend a territory, improve a territory, inhabit a territory. Denmark has failed on every single one of these tests!"
"So they want us to spend hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars defending a territory for them that is 25% bigger than Alaska at 100% American expense. But they say while we do this, it belongs 100% to Denmark!"
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
"They cannot defend Greenland! It's unfair to the American taxpayer who has SUBSIDIZED all of Europe's defense for generations now!"
"American dollars, American treasure, American blood, American ingenuity is what keeps Europe safe and the free world safe. And Donald Trump's insisting that we be respected!"
"They cannot control the territory of Greenland. Under every understanding of law that has existed about territorial control for 500 years to control a territory, you have to be able to defend a territory, improve a territory, inhabit a territory. Denmark has failed on every single one of these tests!"
"So they want us to spend hundreds of BILLIONS of dollars defending a territory for them that is 25% bigger than Alaska at 100% American expense. But they say while we do this, it belongs 100% to Denmark!"
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Bill Maher Delivers a Brutal Message to the COVID “Experts” Who Got It Wrong
“A lot of the dissenting opinions that were suppressed and ridiculed at the time have proven to be CORRECT.”
This includes, but is not limited to:
• COVID came from a lab
• Ivermectin worked
• Masks offered no benefit and were harmful
• Should have never kept kids out of school
• Natural immunity is better than vaccinated immunity
• Long COVID is often a symptom of long vax
• Hospitals murdered COVID patients
• COVID fatality rate and death count were highly inflated
• Unvaccinated were scapegoated for the failure of the shots
• Early treatment was suppressed to make way for a “vaccine”
• Risks of the jab were intentionally hidden from the public
• Vaccine mandates are wrong
• More shots = more risk of infection
• COVID shots are neither safe nor effective
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
“A lot of the dissenting opinions that were suppressed and ridiculed at the time have proven to be CORRECT.”
This includes, but is not limited to:
• COVID came from a lab
• Ivermectin worked
• Masks offered no benefit and were harmful
• Should have never kept kids out of school
• Natural immunity is better than vaccinated immunity
• Long COVID is often a symptom of long vax
• Hospitals murdered COVID patients
• COVID fatality rate and death count were highly inflated
• Unvaccinated were scapegoated for the failure of the shots
• Early treatment was suppressed to make way for a “vaccine”
• Risks of the jab were intentionally hidden from the public
• Vaccine mandates are wrong
• More shots = more risk of infection
• COVID shots are neither safe nor effective
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The U.S. Geological Survey just discovered an additional 1.6 BILLION barrels of commercially viable untapped oil in Texas, including over 28 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
Just when the "experts" think America is about to run out of oil, more is found.
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
Just when the "experts" think America is about to run out of oil, more is found.
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
Forwarded from Donald J. Trump
We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration. Now, after Centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back — World Peace is at stake! China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it. They currently have two dogsleds as protection, one added recently. Only the United States of America, under PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, can play in this game, and very successfully, at that! Nobody will touch this sacred piece of Land, especially since the National Security of the United States, and the World at large, is at stake. On top of everything else, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland have journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown. This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet. These Countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable. Therefore, it is imperative that, in order to protect Global Peace and Security, strong measures be taken so that this potentially perilous situation end quickly, and without question. Starting on February 1st, 2026, all of the above mentioned Countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland), will be charged a 10% Tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America. On June 1st, 2026, the Tariff will be increased to 25%. This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland. The United States has been trying to do this transaction for over 150 years. Many Presidents have tried, and for good reason, but Denmark has always refused. Now, because of The Golden Dome, and Modern Day Weapons Systems, both Offensive and Defensive, the need to ACQUIRE is especially important. Hundreds of Billions of Dollars are currently being spent on Security Programs having to do with “The Dome,” including for the possible protection of Canada, and this very brilliant, but highly complex system can only work at its maximum potential and efficiency, because of angles, metes, and bounds, if this Land is included in it. The United States of America is immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them, including maximum protection, over so many decades. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
DONALD J. TRUMP
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DONALD J. TRUMP
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
'It's a great pity that European nations that have been heavily subsidised and protected by the US for so many years don't appreciate it.'
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ambassador Mike Waltz's on why President Trump wants Greenland:
-Denmark does not have the resources to protect Greenland. They have 0 heavy icebreakers, no Navy in the Western hemisphere, are not contributing to Trump's missile defense plan
-Russia and China have large numbers of ice breakers and are building more to get the natural resources in the Arctic region
-NATO has largely neglected Greenland
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
-Denmark does not have the resources to protect Greenland. They have 0 heavy icebreakers, no Navy in the Western hemisphere, are not contributing to Trump's missile defense plan
-Russia and China have large numbers of ice breakers and are building more to get the natural resources in the Arctic region
-NATO has largely neglected Greenland
VENEZUELAN OIL AND RE INVESTOR'S CLUB
Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔸𝕖𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕞 (Hans G. Schantz)
"While the government of Denmark officially apologized last year for decades of forced sterilization of Indigenous women and girls, the horrific mistreatment has cast a long shadow on the island that has become the center of an international ownership fight."
https://nypost.com/2026/01/16/world-news/greenlanders-speak-out-against-danish-rule-they-stole-our-future/#:~:text=While%20the%20government%20of%20Denmark%20officially%20apologized%20last%20year%20for%20decades%20of%20forced%20sterilization%20of%20Indigenous%20women%20and%20girls%2C%20the%20horrific%20mistreatment%20has%20cast%20a%20long%20shadow%20on%20the%20island%20that%20has%20become%20the%20center%20of%20an%20international%20ownership%20fight.
https://nypost.com/2026/01/16/world-news/greenlanders-speak-out-against-danish-rule-they-stole-our-future/#:~:text=While%20the%20government%20of%20Denmark%20officially%20apologized%20last%20year%20for%20decades%20of%20forced%20sterilization%20of%20Indigenous%20women%20and%20girls%2C%20the%20horrific%20mistreatment%20has%20cast%20a%20long%20shadow%20on%20the%20island%20that%20has%20become%20the%20center%20of%20an%20international%20ownership%20fight.
New York Post
Exclusive | Greenlanders speak out against Danish rule after decades of forced...
“The Danes don’t see us as humans,” Petersen told The Post. “They think we’re too expensive, too small a population. But they take our land, our children, our lives and expect thanks.”
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DIARY OF A CEO: “Do you think Jeffrey Epstein was a spy?”
CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “I believe very strongly he was a spy, yes.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “And who do you think he was working for?”
CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “The Israelis. I’m confident it was the Israelis.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “Why?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU (CIA whistleblower): “Jeffrey Epstein is kind of the stereotypical example that they give you in training for what’s called an ‘access agent.’ This is a different kind of recruit.
“So, for example, if you’re a foreign intelligence service and you want information, like close-in information from a former president, from the CEO of the biggest company in the world, from a member of the British royal family, you’re not going to recruit these guys.
“You’re not going to recruit Bill Clinton or Bill Gates or Prince Andrew. So you do the next best thing. You recruit somebody who has regular access to them. And that person that you recruit is going to need to make these people feel comfortable and appreciated.
“And so you give him plenty of money. So he has this house on an island, or he has the whole island. And maybe you bring in young girls, you get them in compromising positions, just in case you need to use what’s called ‘kompromat,’ compromising pictures.
“We know now that Jeffrey Epstein’s house on the island had video cameras hidden, video cameras in literally every room, including the bathrooms. Why? Why would he care what was going on unless it was to use that information against people?
“As I said, only the Israelis and the Russians use extortion as a motivator.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “So would they have made Jeffrey Epstein rich in order to give him that access?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Yeah.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “How could they have done that?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Oh, that’s easy. I mean, governments are the only ones really that can launder money unfettered. And you can also do it through real estate, through fine art, and through horses. Those are the three easiest ways to launder money today: fine art, real estate, and racehorses.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “But presumably he would have spoken out at some point. No? He would have said something, or?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU: “No. But it would explain why he got a sweetheart deal in 2006. I mean, this is a guy that’s been convicted of child sex crimes, and he gets six months of house arrest with an ankle bracelet? We have mandatory minimums in this country. That’s a five-year mandatory minimum, first offense.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “He definitely had some interesting power, didn’t he?”
FULL INTERVIEW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUNoJ32eLBc&t=922s
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “I believe very strongly he was a spy, yes.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “And who do you think he was working for?”
CIA WHISTLEBLOWER: “The Israelis. I’m confident it was the Israelis.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “Why?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU (CIA whistleblower): “Jeffrey Epstein is kind of the stereotypical example that they give you in training for what’s called an ‘access agent.’ This is a different kind of recruit.
“So, for example, if you’re a foreign intelligence service and you want information, like close-in information from a former president, from the CEO of the biggest company in the world, from a member of the British royal family, you’re not going to recruit these guys.
“You’re not going to recruit Bill Clinton or Bill Gates or Prince Andrew. So you do the next best thing. You recruit somebody who has regular access to them. And that person that you recruit is going to need to make these people feel comfortable and appreciated.
“And so you give him plenty of money. So he has this house on an island, or he has the whole island. And maybe you bring in young girls, you get them in compromising positions, just in case you need to use what’s called ‘kompromat,’ compromising pictures.
“We know now that Jeffrey Epstein’s house on the island had video cameras hidden, video cameras in literally every room, including the bathrooms. Why? Why would he care what was going on unless it was to use that information against people?
“As I said, only the Israelis and the Russians use extortion as a motivator.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “So would they have made Jeffrey Epstein rich in order to give him that access?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Yeah.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “How could they have done that?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU: “Oh, that’s easy. I mean, governments are the only ones really that can launder money unfettered. And you can also do it through real estate, through fine art, and through horses. Those are the three easiest ways to launder money today: fine art, real estate, and racehorses.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “But presumably he would have spoken out at some point. No? He would have said something, or?”
JOHN KIRIAKOU: “No. But it would explain why he got a sweetheart deal in 2006. I mean, this is a guy that’s been convicted of child sex crimes, and he gets six months of house arrest with an ankle bracelet? We have mandatory minimums in this country. That’s a five-year mandatory minimum, first offense.”
DIARY OF A CEO: “He definitely had some interesting power, didn’t he?”
FULL INTERVIEW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yUNoJ32eLBc&t=922s
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Forwarded from 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖡𝗈𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗈𝖿 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 (Bryan)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
44 hour BLITZKRIEG retreat! That’s a new record.
Official US State of Greenland Public Information Channel
Official US State of Greenland Public Information Channel
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
O’Keefe Sneaks Into Davos: WEF Climate Insiders Brag About Weather Manipulation
What they boast about in private—when they think no one’s listening—is chilling.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/okeefe-sneaks-into-davos-wef-climate
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
What they boast about in private—when they think no one’s listening—is chilling.
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/okeefe-sneaks-into-davos-wef-climate
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Vigilantfox
O’Keefe Sneaks Into Davos: WEF Climate Insiders Brag About Weather Manipulation
What they boast about in private—when they think no one’s listening—is chilling.
Forwarded from Andrew Bridgen
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ABridgen
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ABridgen
Telegram
Andrew Bridgen
Independent minded. abridgen.uk
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
The evidence is now undeniable:
1. First Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
2. Second Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
3. Systematic Review Documents 300+ Peer-Reviewed COVID Shot Turbo Cancer Cases Across 27 Countries: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41498242/
4. mRNA "Vaccine" Genomic integration Demonstrated: ijirms.in/index.php/ijir…
5. 17 Ways mRNA Shots Induce Cancer, According to 100 Studies: thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna…
6. mRNA Injections Induce Severe, Long-Lasting Genetic Disruption Linked to Cancer and Chronic Disease: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
7. mRNA "Vaccine" Spike Protein Detected in Both the Cytoplasm and Nuclei of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41076388/
8. First Peer-Reviewed Paper Defines COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Turbo Cancer: journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v01n0…
1. First Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
2. Second Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
3. Systematic Review Documents 300+ Peer-Reviewed COVID Shot Turbo Cancer Cases Across 27 Countries: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41498242/
4. mRNA "Vaccine" Genomic integration Demonstrated: ijirms.in/index.php/ijir…
5. 17 Ways mRNA Shots Induce Cancer, According to 100 Studies: thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna…
6. mRNA Injections Induce Severe, Long-Lasting Genetic Disruption Linked to Cancer and Chronic Disease: pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
7. mRNA "Vaccine" Spike Protein Detected in Both the Cytoplasm and Nuclei of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41076388/
8. First Peer-Reviewed Paper Defines COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Turbo Cancer: journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v01n0…
PubMed
COVID vaccination and post-infection cancer signals: Evaluating patterns and potential biological mechanisms - PubMed
A growing number of peer-reviewed publications have reported diverse cancer types appearing in temporal association with COVID-19 vaccination or infection. To characterize the nature and scope of these reports, a systematic literature search from January…