It was up to $91.91, but again rising.😎

🟢 THE ENTERING PHASE 🟢
SHIFT — IMMINENT.
CHOOSE YOUR SIDE.

The signal has been sent.
The door is opening.
There is no pause button now.

This is the transition window —
where systems switch, narratives break, and positions lock.

🟢 GREEN SIDE = CONTROL
Control of timing.
Control of information.
Control of your position in the shift.

🔻 The old rails are powering down
🔻 The noise is a distraction
🔻 The unaware will react — not decide

⚡️ ISO 20022 is the framework
⚡️ Tier 4B is the entry point
⚡️ Alignment beats speed — every time

This phase is brief.
Hesitation is expensive.
Clarity is everything.

You’re either positioned…
or you’re watching it happen.

@PaulGoldEagle

Wall Street Apes

Investigation in Texas finds H-1B visa applications are being fraudulently tied to residential homes

One immigration lawyer approved over 400,000 H-1B visa applications

60+ immigrant applicants are put per residential home claiming to be a business location

(Holy sh*t)

Via KayleeAshlynn🔥🔥🔥

The United States is withdrawing some personnel from MULTIPLE bases in the Middle East as tensions flare with Iran

Notice of Objection to the Internal Revenue Service’s Authority and Jurisdiction

Title: “Objection to Foreign Administrative Encroachment by the IRS and Its Commercial Beneficiaries”

Jurisdictional Challenge, Demand for Proof of Lawful Delegation, and Formal Notice of Foreign Agent Conflict

Jurisdictional Objection and Constitutional Challenge

To Whom It May Concern:

This Notice is a formal and lawful Objection to the Assumed Authority of the entity known as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). It is issued under rights secured by the U.S. Constitution, including but not limited to the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments, and in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.), Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. § 1505), and the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. § 3501 et seq.).

The undersigned demands immediate production of proof of lawful jurisdiction, including the statutory enactment in the Statutes at Large that creates the Internal Revenue Service as an agency of the United States Government, as required by 44 U.S.C. § 1505(a). To date, no such Act of Congress has been identified, nor has any statutory evidence been presented showing the IRS was lawfully established by Congress under Article I, Section 8.

Further, the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM), the core guiding policy for IRS agents, does not carry the force of law, as confirmed by U.S. v. Horne, 714 F.3d 277 (5th Cir. 2013). In addition, IRS Form 1040 and other demands for information violate the Paperwork Reduction Act because they fail to display valid OMB control numbers in many cases and are not lawfully compelled.

Additionally, Holy See v. United States, 559 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 2009) affirms that foreign or private entities must have express statutory authority to exercise jurisdiction over U.S. persons or property. The IRS, functioning as a trust collection agent under the Northern Trust Corporation and foreign securities structures, lacks such authority and is acting ultra vires.

IRS as a Private Collection Arm for Foreign Commercial Interests

Substantial documentation—including SEC filings, Dun & Bradstreet records, and Department of the Treasury operational disclosures—confirm that the IRS is not a constitutionally created federal agency, but rather functions as a private collection arm for the IMF, Federal Reserve System, and various foreign creditors, operating under Title 27 (Commerce) and Title 26 (Internal Revenue Code), which are not enacted into positive law.

The IRS funnels collections into trust structures administered through entities such as the Northern Trust Corporation, which maintains fiduciary oversight over pooled trust accounts for the Department of the Treasury, the SEC, and global commercial lenders. These structures financialize the American population as bonded sureties and human capital assets through the issuance of CUSIP numbers, tied to birth certificates and court case dockets.

Moreover, the IRS issues Notices of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) without judicial oversight, proper verified assessments, or lawful delegation of judicial power under Article III. The routine denial of due process in these liens constitutes a bill of attainder and constructive fraud, in violation of Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution.

IRS procedures often rely on private contract enforcement under administrative and admiralty jurisdiction, not lawful common law courts of record. The IRS, as a debt collector for international banking interests, does not operate in the capacity of a legitimate domestic agency, but rather as a commercial enforcement wing of a private cartel, thus violating 18 U.S.C. § 912 (Impersonating an Officer) and 15 U.S.C. § 1–2 (Monopolization and Antitrust).

https://x.com/i/status/2011444986408063444

Due Process Violations and Demand for Lawful Remedy

The IRS, with support from Article I administrative courts, systematically denies proper judicial review and strikes evidence that challenges the underlying validity of assessments. This is done through procedural traps, dismissals based on fictitious “frivolous filer” labels, and presumption of debt without proof of contract.

IRS proceedings are commonly railroaded through administrative hearings, where the IRS acts as plaintiff, judge, and jury, in violation of separation of powers and due process. This is explicitly condemned by Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), which held that financial interest in outcome by judges or agencies renders proceedings invalid.

The denial of in-person hearings, refusal to recognize properly executed affidavits of fact, and use of undisclosed commercial rules of procedure amount to a covert military tribunal under admiralty law, not civil justice. This process is not only a denial of due process under the Fifth Amendment, but it also constitutes systemic peonage and debt bondage, as prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 1581 and the Anti-Peonage Act of 1867 (42 Stat. 666).

Therefore, the undersigned demands:

Proof of lawful delegation of authority by the U.S. Congress to the IRS.

Proof of nexus between IRS authority and the United States Constitution.

Immediate cessation of administrative enforcement actions until full due process is restored in a court of competent jurisdiction under Article III.

Failure to rebut these claims within 21 days constitutes tacit agreement to all assertions and will result in a filing of Notice of Liability and a criminal complaint for impersonation, fraud, and racketeering.

USA is a union, not a nation-state.
The union has 50 members; the 50 nation-states.
The union can tax its members, meaning the 50 nation-states.
The union cannot tax the people of the states.
The 16th amendment did not change this. It did not repeal any part of the constitution. It dealt with dividends from govt-owned corporations.
The union can tax its members (the 50 states) anytime! This has possibly happened twice. The states then tax their people.
For some reason, the union is not satisfied with this. So they created two schemes to get around this. And they made those schemes so widespread that people think these schemes are true life.

1st scheme: Union created the federal-citizen status for the freed slaves, where were free but stateless. Then the union duped state citizens into thinking they are federal U.S. citizens. Not true. See Supreme Court case about Louisiana (cattle) slaughter-houses. The U.S. Citizen status can be taxed because federal government created the status. Whereas, the people of the states (not former slaves) are state citizens or state nationals; def not U.S. Citizens!

2nd scheme: Union created a corporate scheme with two parts. Union created a corporation called United States. Union creates corporations named after each people of the states. When John of the Myers clan was born, United States (the corporation) creates JOHN MYERS, a franchise corporation of United States (the corporation). JOHN MYERS, the corporation, can be taxed because federal government created it. The corporation is called a U.S. Person. It's a franchise. This why STATE OF CALIFORNIA has the FRANCHISE TAX BOARD. They don't even hide it.

Telling people about either scheme is like telling someone they're adopted. They think I'm the villain.

ftb.ca.gov

https://x.com/i/status/2011239510869176651

The Supreme Court Has Cold Feet:

What in the world is going on?

Donald Trump has the SCOTUS in the hot seat.

They know this decision is the point of no return. Because if they are serving anyone who is Cabal they basically mark themselves as being compliant with their downfall.

Now if they rule against it they have set themselves up to be looked at as Deep State assets who do not want this country to prosper. And they may come away looking even more foolish if D. Trump finds a way around it by the alternatives I have explained and they end up being the 2nd bird being killed by the one stone.

From a legal perspective, the case, Learning Resources Inc. v. Trump, challenges the president's authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on a broad range of imports, including consumer goods, without explicit congressional approval, arguing that such actions exceed statutory limits and violate separation of powers principles.

Follow 👉🏻 Ariel

Helloooo gorgeous