The creators of so called ISIS probably didn't expect their actors to reveal the fraud that is the history we are taught in schools, through their propaganda videos.

Why is it that supposed 2000 year old ancient Sumerian statues consist of metal rebar, a material which was only invented in the beginning of the 20th century. Are these statues as old as they tell us? Or were they simply casted in the 1930s for us to believe that they are as old as they say.

This was America

Do you know about the corn palace of Sioux City? On the left is the original structure, complete with the onion dome designs found in Russia and Eurasia, built to a much higher spec and quality than it's modern counterpart on the right, which was built recently in modern times. Those who rewrite the history books want to convince you that this structure was originally built to celebrate corn.

It's clear that the technologies which we used to construct the buildings of the past are no longer here. We can only mimic, or rather mock their style. But it's evident that the old world architecture was made to a much higher standard than we know of today.

The 1907 corn palace. Asides from the obvious mocking of Tartarian architecture (check forwarded message above for context), the use of the Swastika further demonstrates that worldwide Aryan 卐 culture was still present in America post flood, and only recently for the past 70 years have they been seriously attempting to scrub any evidence of it. It's not just "An Indian Goodluck symbol", it is a cosmic sign of Gods. It was not only used by Hindus and Nazis, but all across this plane and beyond.

They do not want you to see this symbol.

Mudfloods do STILL happen. It's not a single isolated historical event, they're known to swallow entire buildings and towns even. Surely nothing of such scale has occurred within the last two centuries, but this is just to demonstrate that the physics of the phenomena are legitimate.