Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from SomeBitchIKnow
In section 3.65, the document states that Covid funds are being funneled into this effort, some $150 million.
Large portions of this is then funneled into women's "legal services."
It also discusses educational programs, etc.
At recommendation 30, things get interesting/Orwellian.
The document suggests "appropriate technology use is a shared community responsibility."
Also: "There should be greater clarity around a platform’s obligation to remove content, including through the Online Safety Act."
"In order to open/maintain an existing social media account, customers should be required by law to identify themselves to a platform using 100 points of ID, in the same way as a person must provide identification for a mobile phone account, or to buy a mobile SIM card."
And that information should be made available to authorities upon request by the "eSafety commissioner."
It's a slippery slope, my friends. Ending online anonymity forever in your country because an emotionally-charged topic is the catalyst is very dangerous.
But keep in mind... the social media/ID system is not built with Covid-19 in mind... yet.
👁
Large portions of this is then funneled into women's "legal services."
It also discusses educational programs, etc.
At recommendation 30, things get interesting/Orwellian.
The document suggests "appropriate technology use is a shared community responsibility."
Also: "There should be greater clarity around a platform’s obligation to remove content, including through the Online Safety Act."
"In order to open/maintain an existing social media account, customers should be required by law to identify themselves to a platform using 100 points of ID, in the same way as a person must provide identification for a mobile phone account, or to buy a mobile SIM card."
And that information should be made available to authorities upon request by the "eSafety commissioner."
It's a slippery slope, my friends. Ending online anonymity forever in your country because an emotionally-charged topic is the catalyst is very dangerous.
But keep in mind... the social media/ID system is not built with Covid-19 in mind... yet.
👁