Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/update-coronavax-safety-in-the-netherlands
This article & this figure (among others) is very troubling. Sadly, it’s no longer any kind of surprise.
In the event a highly plausible expert produces troubling evidence like this, tech monopolies form to censor that information. Highly disturbing, again, no longer any surprise.
Please consider sharing the article and figure. Note that the data in the plot is available at the links below the graph.
Best wishes
Mike
This article & this figure (among others) is very troubling. Sadly, it’s no longer any kind of surprise.
In the event a highly plausible expert produces troubling evidence like this, tech monopolies form to censor that information. Highly disturbing, again, no longer any surprise.
Please consider sharing the article and figure. Note that the data in the plot is available at the links below the graph.
Best wishes
Mike
🤬32👍15🔥5
"Dear George,
Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Mark Sharman and I have more than 55 years of senior journalistic experience, including posts as Director of News and Sport at ITV and Director of Broadcasting at BSkyB, where I had executive responsibility for Sky News. I have always fought for fair, balanced and objective reporting, presenting two sides of debate.
It is, therefore, with some authority that I can say that your piece ennoscriptd “Anti-vaxxers applaud Tory MP Christopher Chope as he questions safety of Covid vaccines” (The Times, October 31st) is one the most biased, ill-informed and shady pieces of journalism I have ever seen..."
News Uncut responds to The Times' hit piece on Sir Christopher Chope and others 👉🏻 Read more
Allow me to introduce myself. My name is Mark Sharman and I have more than 55 years of senior journalistic experience, including posts as Director of News and Sport at ITV and Director of Broadcasting at BSkyB, where I had executive responsibility for Sky News. I have always fought for fair, balanced and objective reporting, presenting two sides of debate.
It is, therefore, with some authority that I can say that your piece ennoscriptd “Anti-vaxxers applaud Tory MP Christopher Chope as he questions safety of Covid vaccines” (The Times, October 31st) is one the most biased, ill-informed and shady pieces of journalism I have ever seen..."
News Uncut responds to The Times' hit piece on Sir Christopher Chope and others 👉🏻 Read more
News Uncut: Straight Talk, Hard Truths
TIMES ARTICLE 'ONE OF THE MOST BIASED, ILL-INFORMED AND SHADY PIECES EVER'
News Uncut writes to national noscript to challenge gross misrepresentation
👍69👏28🔥18
I think it's important for the sake of transparency to clarify one of Mark's comments in the above article☝🏻
In December 2020 - the week that the Covid-19 'vaccine' rollout began in the UK - Oracle Films released a video called Ask the Experts, which was produced in collaboration with CoviLeaks. It brought together the professional opinions of more than 30 doctors, nurses, pharmacists and scientists from across the world regarding the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 injections.
OffGuardian did a great write-up of the piece at the time, which you can read here.
The film was a concerted counterpoint to what we felt was a distinct absence of alternative opinion, true scientific debate, and therefore informed consent being provided by legacy media at the time.
Every single person involved made a statement on behalf of themselves - not as a collective. In fact, many firmly disagreed with one another on various issues.
The roster included:
Dr Andrew Kaufman
Dr Hilde De Smet
Dr Nils R Fosse
Dr Elizabeth Evans
Dr Mohammad Adil
Dr Vernon Coleman
Prof. Dolores Cahill
Dr Zac Cox
Dr Anna Forbes
Dr Ralf ER Sundberg
Dr Johan Denis
Dr Daniel Cullum
Moritz von der Borch
Dr Anne Fierlafijn
Dr Tom Cowan
Dr Kevin Corbett
Dr Carrie Madej
Dr Barre Lando
Nurse Kate Shemirani
Pharmacist Sandy Lunoe
Licensed Acupuncturist Boris Dragin
Dr Piotr Rubas
Dr Natalia Prego Cancelo
Dr Rashid Buttar
Dr Nour De San
Dr Kelly Brogan
Prof. Konstantin Pavlidis
Dr Sherri Tenpenny
Journalist Senta Depuydt
Dr Heiko Santelmann
Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson
Dr Mikael Nordfors
Dr Elke F. de Klerk
As you can imagine, there was a broad mix of views.
Made clear in a disclaimer attached to the video's denoscription was the fact that "In no way do the views of any individual contributor to this video represent the views of anyone else shown, nor do they necessarily represent the views of Oracle Films or CoviLeaks. To confirm, this video contains a wide variety of views, all of which are exclusive to the individual expressing them."
The film subsequently went pretty well viral, and resulted in the BBC creating a Panorama episode in February 2021 ennoscriptd "Vaccines: The Disinformation War" in which they heavily criticised the film, its participants and Oracle Films. The BBC's Marianna Spring even went so far as to boast on air about having Oracle Films' PayPal account shut down in response to the film.
I bring this up, because in the film, Dr Johan Denis, a medical doctor from Belgium, made this statement as part of his testimony:
“This vaccine is just not proven safe. It has been developed too quickly. We have no idea what the long term effects will be. It needs much more investigation. There is no hurry or emergency. It might possibly change your DNA. This is irreversible and irreparable for all future generations. An experiment on humanity. I would never give it to myself, my patients or my loved ones. We are no guinea pigs.”
I believe this is the comment that George Grylls is referring to in his recent Times article in which he referred to Oracle Films as "an antivax conspiracy group that had their account suspended by Paypal last year after claiming that vaccines could alter DNA."
However as Mark Sharman has rightfully pointed out, to say that "Oracle Films have claimed that vaccines could alter DNA" is simply not true and this reflects either a lack of background research or a direct attempt at misrepresentation. You'll note that George's wording also implies [all] vaccines, which is subtle but significant phrasing and serves only to further muddy the waters.
Irrespective of whether we agree or disagree with the views of anybody involved in Ask the Experts, we stand by our decision to offer a platform to medical professionals during this time period. These were the men and women putting their heads firmly above the parapet at great personal risk to their reputations and their livelihoods at a time when very few others were so courageous. And we will forever have the utmost respect for all those that participated.
In December 2020 - the week that the Covid-19 'vaccine' rollout began in the UK - Oracle Films released a video called Ask the Experts, which was produced in collaboration with CoviLeaks. It brought together the professional opinions of more than 30 doctors, nurses, pharmacists and scientists from across the world regarding the safety and efficacy of Covid-19 injections.
OffGuardian did a great write-up of the piece at the time, which you can read here.
The film was a concerted counterpoint to what we felt was a distinct absence of alternative opinion, true scientific debate, and therefore informed consent being provided by legacy media at the time.
Every single person involved made a statement on behalf of themselves - not as a collective. In fact, many firmly disagreed with one another on various issues.
The roster included:
Dr Andrew Kaufman
Dr Hilde De Smet
Dr Nils R Fosse
Dr Elizabeth Evans
Dr Mohammad Adil
Dr Vernon Coleman
Prof. Dolores Cahill
Dr Zac Cox
Dr Anna Forbes
Dr Ralf ER Sundberg
Dr Johan Denis
Dr Daniel Cullum
Moritz von der Borch
Dr Anne Fierlafijn
Dr Tom Cowan
Dr Kevin Corbett
Dr Carrie Madej
Dr Barre Lando
Nurse Kate Shemirani
Pharmacist Sandy Lunoe
Licensed Acupuncturist Boris Dragin
Dr Piotr Rubas
Dr Natalia Prego Cancelo
Dr Rashid Buttar
Dr Nour De San
Dr Kelly Brogan
Prof. Konstantin Pavlidis
Dr Sherri Tenpenny
Journalist Senta Depuydt
Dr Heiko Santelmann
Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson
Dr Mikael Nordfors
Dr Elke F. de Klerk
As you can imagine, there was a broad mix of views.
Made clear in a disclaimer attached to the video's denoscription was the fact that "In no way do the views of any individual contributor to this video represent the views of anyone else shown, nor do they necessarily represent the views of Oracle Films or CoviLeaks. To confirm, this video contains a wide variety of views, all of which are exclusive to the individual expressing them."
The film subsequently went pretty well viral, and resulted in the BBC creating a Panorama episode in February 2021 ennoscriptd "Vaccines: The Disinformation War" in which they heavily criticised the film, its participants and Oracle Films. The BBC's Marianna Spring even went so far as to boast on air about having Oracle Films' PayPal account shut down in response to the film.
I bring this up, because in the film, Dr Johan Denis, a medical doctor from Belgium, made this statement as part of his testimony:
“This vaccine is just not proven safe. It has been developed too quickly. We have no idea what the long term effects will be. It needs much more investigation. There is no hurry or emergency. It might possibly change your DNA. This is irreversible and irreparable for all future generations. An experiment on humanity. I would never give it to myself, my patients or my loved ones. We are no guinea pigs.”
I believe this is the comment that George Grylls is referring to in his recent Times article in which he referred to Oracle Films as "an antivax conspiracy group that had their account suspended by Paypal last year after claiming that vaccines could alter DNA."
However as Mark Sharman has rightfully pointed out, to say that "Oracle Films have claimed that vaccines could alter DNA" is simply not true and this reflects either a lack of background research or a direct attempt at misrepresentation. You'll note that George's wording also implies [all] vaccines, which is subtle but significant phrasing and serves only to further muddy the waters.
Irrespective of whether we agree or disagree with the views of anybody involved in Ask the Experts, we stand by our decision to offer a platform to medical professionals during this time period. These were the men and women putting their heads firmly above the parapet at great personal risk to their reputations and their livelihoods at a time when very few others were so courageous. And we will forever have the utmost respect for all those that participated.
👍85❤43👏34
Forwarded from World Council for Health
World Council for Health Stands with Dr Peter McCullough
Dr Peter McCullough is a world-renowned cardiologist, the author of hundreds of articles published in peer-reviewed journals, and an outstanding physician who has been researching Covid-19 and how to treat it from the very beginning. His tireless efforts to alert the medical community to effective early Covid-19 treatment protocols and the risks of Covid-19 vaccines have repeatedly drawn the ire of medical bodies beholden to corporate interests.
As a result, he has been stripped of three professorships, multiple editorial positions at academic medical journals, and many other professional memberships. Now, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has advised that it intends to strip Dr McCullough of his board certifications, which would bar him from practicing medicine.
The ABIM’s decision to revoke his certification says far more about the ABIM than Dr McCullough. It has accused Dr McCullough of understating the risk of dying from Covid for people under 50 years old, and overstating the risk of death from Covid vaccines. This accusation is predicated on the assumption that the ‘science’ on Covid-19 vaccines and the illness itself is settled. Science is never settled.
World Council for Health suggests the ABIM reconsider its position for the sake of its own credibility. In the meantime, World Council for Health stands with Dr Peter McCullough and honours his steadfast commitment to helping people worldwide despite considerable personal cost.
FULL STATEMENT: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/statements/peter-mccullough
📩 NEWSLETTER | 💪 JOIN US
📌 Follow WCH:
➨ @WCH_org
🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat
Dr Peter McCullough is a world-renowned cardiologist, the author of hundreds of articles published in peer-reviewed journals, and an outstanding physician who has been researching Covid-19 and how to treat it from the very beginning. His tireless efforts to alert the medical community to effective early Covid-19 treatment protocols and the risks of Covid-19 vaccines have repeatedly drawn the ire of medical bodies beholden to corporate interests.
As a result, he has been stripped of three professorships, multiple editorial positions at academic medical journals, and many other professional memberships. Now, the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has advised that it intends to strip Dr McCullough of his board certifications, which would bar him from practicing medicine.
The ABIM’s decision to revoke his certification says far more about the ABIM than Dr McCullough. It has accused Dr McCullough of understating the risk of dying from Covid for people under 50 years old, and overstating the risk of death from Covid vaccines. This accusation is predicated on the assumption that the ‘science’ on Covid-19 vaccines and the illness itself is settled. Science is never settled.
World Council for Health suggests the ABIM reconsider its position for the sake of its own credibility. In the meantime, World Council for Health stands with Dr Peter McCullough and honours his steadfast commitment to helping people worldwide despite considerable personal cost.
FULL STATEMENT: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/statements/peter-mccullough
📩 NEWSLETTER | 💪 JOIN US
📌 Follow WCH:
➨ @WCH_org
🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat
👏66👍25🤬5😢4❤1
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
What could it possibly be?
Crisis as excess deaths soar to levels higher than during Covid pandemic
"Excess deaths in England and Wales are currently running higher than in the main pandemic years of 2020 and 2021, figures have shown.
Throughout October, there have been an average of 1,564 extra deaths per week, compared with a weekly average of just 315 in 2020 and 1,322 in 2021.
Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that in the week ending Oct 21, there were 1,714 excess deaths in England and Wales, of which only 469 were due to Covid - just 27 per cent of the total.
It is 16.8 per cent higher than normal. Deaths are also running higher than the five-year pre-Covid October average from 2015 to 2019, figures showed."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/crisis-as-excess-deaths-soar-to-levels-higher-than-during-covid-pandemic/ar-AA13CTwn
Crisis as excess deaths soar to levels higher than during Covid pandemic
"Excess deaths in England and Wales are currently running higher than in the main pandemic years of 2020 and 2021, figures have shown.
Throughout October, there have been an average of 1,564 extra deaths per week, compared with a weekly average of just 315 in 2020 and 1,322 in 2021.
Latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed that in the week ending Oct 21, there were 1,714 excess deaths in England and Wales, of which only 469 were due to Covid - just 27 per cent of the total.
It is 16.8 per cent higher than normal. Deaths are also running higher than the five-year pre-Covid October average from 2015 to 2019, figures showed."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/crisis-as-excess-deaths-soar-to-levels-higher-than-during-covid-pandemic/ar-AA13CTwn
MSN
Crisis as excess deaths soar to levels higher than during Covid pandemic
Crisis as excess deaths soar to levels higher than during Covid pandemic
😢31👍5🤬2🔥1