Romania's most famous football team, Steaua Bucharest, announce a ban on VACCINATED players. Owner Gigi Becali recently stated that striker Claudiu Keseru can no longer play at a high level, and that Steaua Bucharest, and rival clubs, are struggling after taking the vaccine.
His statement has drawn a furious reaction from the country's government.
Source
His statement has drawn a furious reaction from the country's government.
Source
Mail Online
Steaua Bucharest announce a ban on VACCINATED players
Becali went on to claim that people who are vaccinated against the virus die in hospitals, as opposed to those who have refused the jabs.
👏27👍9❤4
Forwarded from Brunobarking ️️️BrunoBarks
The “Point?”
NOT health, and NOT science.
Pure tyranny.
#NeverForget WHO did this to us.
#NeverAgain
#RememberInNovember
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10565993/Cloth-masks-allow-90-particles-filter-giving-little-ability-prevent-Covid.html
NOT health, and NOT science.
Pure tyranny.
#NeverForget WHO did this to us.
#NeverAgain
#RememberInNovember
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10565993/Cloth-masks-allow-90-particles-filter-giving-little-ability-prevent-Covid.html
👍28
Forwarded from Fifi 4 Freedom_A Stand in the Park UK
This is what Pfizer wanted kept under wraps for 75 years: the 'safe and effective vaccine' with 9 pages of side effects.
@astandintheparkuk
@astandintheparkuk
🤬40👍9
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A pleasure to team up once again with our friends at The Highwire and provide visuals for their recent interview with Dr Tess Lawrie.
Tomorrow we’ll be releasing our new film ‘A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill’, produced in collaboration with Dr Lawrie.
Further updates will be posted here.
In the meantime check out Tess Lawrie’s full interview on The Highwire here: https://thehighwire.com/watch/
t.me/oraclefilms
Tomorrow we’ll be releasing our new film ‘A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill’, produced in collaboration with Dr Lawrie.
Further updates will be posted here.
In the meantime check out Tess Lawrie’s full interview on The Highwire here: https://thehighwire.com/watch/
t.me/oraclefilms
👍28❤23
❗️An important notice to everybody on this channel.
Firstly, thank you for being here and for your support. Content we produce is heavily censored and restricted. As a result, our work is distributed in an entirely decentralised manner, and by popular demand. That makes you an important part of our distribution model – not just a passive audience member. As affirmed by the pre-roll in pretty much all of our videos, if a topic is important to you, or if you think it’s information worth passing along, feel free to share, download and reupload our work. We impose no copyright limitations; our work can be published anywhere, so long as it’s not-for-profit and you provide credit where possible. It sucks for our metrics, and it’s a model that’s practically impossible to monetise. But that’s not why we’re doing what we’re doing.
Many of you will have already figured this out, I’m sure. But why are we mentioning this now?
Later today we’ll be releasing our latest film ‘A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill’, which we produced in collaboration with Dr Tess Lawrie.
In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”
The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. A media onslaught against the medicine ensued. What were Dr Hill’s reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?
One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame.
Good information on Ivermectin, and effective early treatment for COVID-19 in general, has been heavily censored and repressed, and therefore it’s likely this film will be. That’s why, if this film resonates with you. If you think this is something that more people should be made aware of. Then please share this one. Share and upload it everywhere. It may be the most important film we’ve ever produced.
Thank you to all of you.
- Oracle Films
Firstly, thank you for being here and for your support. Content we produce is heavily censored and restricted. As a result, our work is distributed in an entirely decentralised manner, and by popular demand. That makes you an important part of our distribution model – not just a passive audience member. As affirmed by the pre-roll in pretty much all of our videos, if a topic is important to you, or if you think it’s information worth passing along, feel free to share, download and reupload our work. We impose no copyright limitations; our work can be published anywhere, so long as it’s not-for-profit and you provide credit where possible. It sucks for our metrics, and it’s a model that’s practically impossible to monetise. But that’s not why we’re doing what we’re doing.
Many of you will have already figured this out, I’m sure. But why are we mentioning this now?
Later today we’ll be releasing our latest film ‘A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill’, which we produced in collaboration with Dr Tess Lawrie.
In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”
The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. A media onslaught against the medicine ensued. What were Dr Hill’s reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?
One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame.
Good information on Ivermectin, and effective early treatment for COVID-19 in general, has been heavily censored and repressed, and therefore it’s likely this film will be. That’s why, if this film resonates with you. If you think this is something that more people should be made aware of. Then please share this one. Share and upload it everywhere. It may be the most important film we’ve ever produced.
Thank you to all of you.
- Oracle Films
👍75❤37
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill
By Dr Tess Lawrie
Watch on Brand New Tube
Watch on Rumble
Watch on Odysee
Watch on YouTube (pulled within 5 mins)
By Dr Tess Lawrie
Watch on Brand New Tube
Watch on Rumble
Watch on Odysee
👍103❤53👏20😢2