Was William Tyndale killed by the Catholic Church?
This is a claim brought up by Protestants to show that the Catholic killed people to keep the Bible away from the people
But is this true?
No, he was killed in 1537
By then England was no longer in communion with Rome and was Protestant
The Protestant king of England ordered his death not the Pope
This is a claim brought up by Protestants to show that the Catholic killed people to keep the Bible away from the people
But is this true?
No, he was killed in 1537
By then England was no longer in communion with Rome and was Protestant
The Protestant king of England ordered his death not the Pope
ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕥 ℍ𝕒𝕥𝕖
Was William Tyndale killed by the Catholic Church? This is a claim brought up by Protestants to show that the Catholic killed people to keep the Bible away from the people But is this true? No, he was killed in 1537 By then England was no longer in communion…
Btw his translation contained so many errors in the New Testament alone that Anglicans declared his work heretical
😁1
Forwarded from Christianity Exposed?
The Galilean Messiah
Calling Jesus a ‘Jew’ obscures the fact that he was a Galilean rather than a Judaean, specifically a Galilean Israelite rather than a Judaean Israelite. It has hindered appreciation and further analysis of the economic, political and socio-cultural differences between Galileans and Judaeans in Palestine of the first century. Consequently it has contributed toward misinterpretation of several features of the Gospel stories, including the significance of the Galilee-Judaea contrasts. It denies, or at least obscures, the fact that he and his followers were regarded in their own day by their own people as Galileans and not as a party of ‘Jews’ or ‘Judaeans’. Like the term ‘Christian’, it is also an anachronistic identifier that blurs the reality of Jesus as a representative of first-century rather than fourth-century Israel, even though there are numerous aspects of continuity between the Israel of the Mishnaic and post-Mishnaic periods and the Second Temple period of Jesus’ day. After having taught a course at University of San Francisco for over twenty years on ‘Jesus the Jew’ with my colleague Rabbi David Davis in which we stressed the thorough-going ‘Jewishness’ of Jesus, I would now rename that course ‘Jesus the Israelite’ and gladly sacrifice alliteration for historical accuracy.
-----
From: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus by Dr. John Elliot
@ChristianityExposed1
Calling Jesus a ‘Jew’ obscures the fact that he was a Galilean rather than a Judaean, specifically a Galilean Israelite rather than a Judaean Israelite. It has hindered appreciation and further analysis of the economic, political and socio-cultural differences between Galileans and Judaeans in Palestine of the first century. Consequently it has contributed toward misinterpretation of several features of the Gospel stories, including the significance of the Galilee-Judaea contrasts. It denies, or at least obscures, the fact that he and his followers were regarded in their own day by their own people as Galileans and not as a party of ‘Jews’ or ‘Judaeans’. Like the term ‘Christian’, it is also an anachronistic identifier that blurs the reality of Jesus as a representative of first-century rather than fourth-century Israel, even though there are numerous aspects of continuity between the Israel of the Mishnaic and post-Mishnaic periods and the Second Temple period of Jesus’ day. After having taught a course at University of San Francisco for over twenty years on ‘Jesus the Jew’ with my colleague Rabbi David Davis in which we stressed the thorough-going ‘Jewishness’ of Jesus, I would now rename that course ‘Jesus the Israelite’ and gladly sacrifice alliteration for historical accuracy.
-----
From: Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus by Dr. John Elliot
@ChristianityExposed1
👍2🤔1
Forwarded from Christianity Exposed?
Nietzsche on the importance of “shooting” all Anti-Semites
“Although you have so far demonstrated little faith in my ability to pay,? I yet hope to demonstrate that I am somebody who pays his debts - for example, to you am just having all anti-Semites shot.”
–To friend Overbeck and wife.
— Friedrich Nietzsche, letter entry, dated 4 January 1889
“Although you have so far demonstrated little faith in my ability to pay,? I yet hope to demonstrate that I am somebody who pays his debts - for example, to you am just having all anti-Semites shot.”
–To friend Overbeck and wife.
— Friedrich Nietzsche, letter entry, dated 4 January 1889
Christianity Exposed?
Nietzsche on the importance of “shooting” all Anti-Semites “Although you have so far demonstrated little faith in my ability to pay,? I yet hope to demonstrate that I am somebody who pays his debts - for example, to you am just having all anti-Semites shot.”…
Nietzsche would be in TPUSA lobbying for israel if he was alive
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Me when a non Christian says I shouldn’t celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ
🙏1