Brief Timeline of Israel-Arab History

The History of the Palestine-Israel Conflict (II): from 1948 to Oslo
The module is taught over 10 weeks in a two hour lecture each week https://perma.cc/MVR6-SY2V

The Israeli and Palestinian conflict narratives originated during the British mandate period (1920-1948).

The core event in the Palestinian national narrative is Al-Nakba (The Catastrophe), following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948.

The 1967 War, called Al-Naksa (The Setback) by Palestinians, resulted in complete Israeli occupation of Historical Palestine. In total, Israel seized the West Bank including East Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, the Sinai, and the Golan Heights, and it was in the years after Al-Naksa that the Israeli settlement growth accelerated in the West Bank.

...

Meanwhile she is saying 75 years means 2023 - 75 = 1948

So let we check what Ingrid Baukhol writes in the Master Thesis:

The previous year, Palestinians had rejected the UN Partition Plan that was to leave them with 43% of what they considered to be their land (Pappé, 2006c). The war in 1948, between the newly established Israel and the Arab states, is seen as ignited by the Israeli forces and was fought on the land of historical Palestine. It came upon an unprepared Palestinian people, and over 700.000 people were displaced because of the war. In Palestinians’ eyes, Israelis systematically and violently expelled Palestinians and later denied the majority of the displaced the right to return. The traumatic experiences from the war added to the Palestinians’ feeling of humiliation and suppression resulting from the Jewish immigration. The eradication of Arab cities and the continued expulsion after 1948 only increased the scope of the tragedy for the Palestinians (Pappé, 2006c; Rouhana, 2006; Daoudi and Barakat, 2013: 62-63). The Jewish immigrants had now become Israelis, and to Palestinians it was the Zionist project that had brought this humiliation upon them.

Security Council Resolution 242: The Situation in the Middle East

The resolution calls for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the occupied territories, acknowledges the claim of sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every state in the region and calls on the UN Secretary-General to appoint an Envoy to facilitate an acceptable solution to the conflict.

Israel's rights are being consistently negated through misleading interpreta- tions of UN Security Council Resolution 242. The resolution does not request Israel to withdraw from all the territories captured in the 1967 Six-Day War and does not recognize that the Palestinian refugees have a right to return to Israel. The Security Council laid down several principles that should lead to a peaceful solution of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Among these principles are an Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in 1967 to new secure and recognized boundaries , to be established by agreement , and the need fora just settlement of the refugee problem, without any reference to a right of return

A careful examination of the wording of the relevant provisions of Resolution 242 (1967) has led to the conclusion that the interpretation favored by the Arab states is misleading. By this resolution the Security Council has laid down several principles that should lead to a peaceful solution of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Among these principles are an Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied in 1967 to new secure and recognized boundaries, to be established by agreement, and the need for a just settlement of the refugee problem, without any reference to a right of return. The solution may include a right to settle in the Palestinian state after its establishment, settlement and integration in other states (Arab and non- Arab), and perhaps the return of a small number to Israel if compelling humanitarian reasons are involved, such as family unification

by Ruth Lapidoth (Senior Researcher for Israel Studies https://perma.cc/4HGS-VC6L)