In Toronto, the municipal government has expanded “bubble zones” around synagogues and other institutions in response to protests against the marketing of West Bank settlements, such as those organized by Israeli real estate promoter Gidon Katz. These zones prevent demonstrators from approaching certain locations, often based not on actual threats of violence but on subjective fears of potential harm. While some incidents of assault have occurred at real estate events, police reports show that counterprotesters, not demonstrators, were more often the aggressors, and violent anti-Jewish incidents at places of worship are rare in Toronto. Despite this, local authorities have justified these expansive restrictions as necessary for community safety.
The bubble zones effectively restrict constitutionally protected freedom of expression and assembly in areas where opposition to Israeli settlement policies is expressed. Data from 2018 to 2024 show that anti-Jewish violent assaults are lower than anti-Muslim, anti-Black, and anti-LGBT assaults, and most anti-Jewish assaults occur on streets rather than at religious or cultural institutions. Surveys suggest that fears among Jewish residents are largely linked to emotional attachment to Israel and political criticism of its policies rather than immediate physical threats. This indicates that the bylaw responds more to perceived symbolic threats than to real danger.
https://jacobin.com/2026/01/toronto-protest-israel-free-speech/
The bubble zones effectively restrict constitutionally protected freedom of expression and assembly in areas where opposition to Israeli settlement policies is expressed. Data from 2018 to 2024 show that anti-Jewish violent assaults are lower than anti-Muslim, anti-Black, and anti-LGBT assaults, and most anti-Jewish assaults occur on streets rather than at religious or cultural institutions. Surveys suggest that fears among Jewish residents are largely linked to emotional attachment to Israel and political criticism of its policies rather than immediate physical threats. This indicates that the bylaw responds more to perceived symbolic threats than to real danger.
https://jacobin.com/2026/01/toronto-protest-israel-free-speech/
Jacobin
Toronto Is Segregating Dissent
In the wake of protests over West Bank real estate, Toronto has ring-fenced public space around dozens of synagogues. This expansion of “bubble zones” has less to do with real danger than with political lawfare against critics of Israel.
The world feels unsettled, as if history itself were changing tempo. The familiar landmarks of the modern age are blurring, slipping away, and the stories we once told ourselves about progress and power no longer map cleanly onto the terrain before us. What we are living through seems, with each new day, less like a passing rearrangement of power, less like a momentary realignment of nations. We sense something deeper and more enduring: a transformation whose outlines we are only beginning to discern. History no longer feels like something unfolding behind us but something rushing toward us, urgent and impossible to ignore.
[...] China now accounts for more than half of the world’s installed solar and wind capacity combined. Roughly three-quarters of all renewable energy projects currently underway worldwide are either in China or being driven by Chinese contractors. About 30% of global emissions come from China, but so too does much of the growth in decarbonization technology. China has transformed the global energy transition by demonstrating that massive and rapid deployment could make renewable energy cost-competitive worldwide.
[...] That historical chapter may now be closing. China appears to have found that path. The system powering its success is an extraordinarily intricate alloy of Confucianism, Leninism, technocratic authoritarianism, state capitalism, and market mechanisms. Yet based on the many conversations I’ve had with Chinese intellectuals, they now recognize that China has attained wealth and power in a distinctly Chinese way. If Levenson’s framework is correct, we are witnessing not merely China’s rise but its graduation from the central quest that defined its modern history.
[...] What might have been another season of U.S. introspection has morphed into something more acute: the painful recognition that another system, however flawed, has delivered results on a scale that the United States has not. This is to me, as an American, a source of not inconsiderable anguish. I take no pleasure in witnessing what my country has become—a nation I love, torn apart by political tribalism so intense and so toxic that I fear it may be beyond repair, at least in the coming, and critical, decade. But confronting this crisis requires looking squarely at what seems so unsettling about China’s success. As Chas W. Freeman, a retired senior U.S. diplomat, has observed, “Americans now exhibit an odd combination of self-doubt, complacency, and hubris”— a mix that has prevented the kind of clear-eyed assessment the moment requires.
[...] Consider what China’s trajectory means for countries across the Global South that were told for decades there was only one path to prosperity: the Washington Consensus path of privatization, deregulation, and democratic governance. China offers proof that another model can work: state-led development, long-term planning, massive infrastructure investment, and selective integration with global markets, all while maintaining political autonomy. Whether one admires this model or not, its success cannot be denied, and its implications ripple far beyond East Asia.
https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/the-great-reckoning/
[...] China now accounts for more than half of the world’s installed solar and wind capacity combined. Roughly three-quarters of all renewable energy projects currently underway worldwide are either in China or being driven by Chinese contractors. About 30% of global emissions come from China, but so too does much of the growth in decarbonization technology. China has transformed the global energy transition by demonstrating that massive and rapid deployment could make renewable energy cost-competitive worldwide.
[...] That historical chapter may now be closing. China appears to have found that path. The system powering its success is an extraordinarily intricate alloy of Confucianism, Leninism, technocratic authoritarianism, state capitalism, and market mechanisms. Yet based on the many conversations I’ve had with Chinese intellectuals, they now recognize that China has attained wealth and power in a distinctly Chinese way. If Levenson’s framework is correct, we are witnessing not merely China’s rise but its graduation from the central quest that defined its modern history.
[...] What might have been another season of U.S. introspection has morphed into something more acute: the painful recognition that another system, however flawed, has delivered results on a scale that the United States has not. This is to me, as an American, a source of not inconsiderable anguish. I take no pleasure in witnessing what my country has become—a nation I love, torn apart by political tribalism so intense and so toxic that I fear it may be beyond repair, at least in the coming, and critical, decade. But confronting this crisis requires looking squarely at what seems so unsettling about China’s success. As Chas W. Freeman, a retired senior U.S. diplomat, has observed, “Americans now exhibit an odd combination of self-doubt, complacency, and hubris”— a mix that has prevented the kind of clear-eyed assessment the moment requires.
[...] Consider what China’s trajectory means for countries across the Global South that were told for decades there was only one path to prosperity: the Washington Consensus path of privatization, deregulation, and democratic governance. China offers proof that another model can work: state-led development, long-term planning, massive infrastructure investment, and selective integration with global markets, all while maintaining political autonomy. Whether one admires this model or not, its success cannot be denied, and its implications ripple far beyond East Asia.
https://www.theideasletter.org/essay/the-great-reckoning/
www.theideasletter.org
The Great Reckoning - The Ideas Letter
The world feels unsettled, as if history itself were changing tempo. The familiar landmarks of the modern age are blurring, slipping away, and the stories we once told ourselves about…
The peasant way of life is a critical buffer against climate change. Peasant villages recycle biochemical waste back to the land; many peasants also supply their nutritional needs from their own farms. Peasants, who directly manage about 10 per cent of the land on Earth – an area five times larger than all towns and cities – supply a countervailing principle to corporate extractionism and short-termism. They also preserve critical local knowledge of land and weather systems, and the interactions of plants and animals. The peasantry is one of humanity’s most crucial economic, social and ecological resources, and we need to invest in it if we are to flourish. Affluent and innovative, this class will insulate us from more extreme degradation of natural systems. Impoverished and terrorised, it will be forced, in the end, to leave the land en masse, with manifold catastrophic consequences.
https://aeon.co/essays/the-planet-and-human-social-life-depend-on-peasant-farmers
https://aeon.co/essays/the-planet-and-human-social-life-depend-on-peasant-farmers
Aeon
The world needs peasants
Far from being a relic of the past, peasants are vital to feeding the world. They need to be supported, not marginalised
Of the American elite who see continuing value in literate thought, they are, for the most part, happy to create a society where a small “cognitive elite” dominate the rest. Poor kids spend an extra two hours on the black mirror every day, while rich people send their kids to private schools where no electronic devices are allowed, as Mary Harrington recently explained in the New York Times. Controlling the media effect is possible even in America; we have simply reduced it to a class privilege. I love the First Amendment and abhor censorship, and yet I have reluctantly come to believe that the Great Firewall of China will be a long-term benefit to that country. What China shows us is that, contra the whole line of technology-first scholarship following McLuhan, it’s the social system technology is embedded in that matters. China is not a utopia, but its citizens have a brighter future than ours, and they will be able to read about it, thanks to a sociopolitical system that still sees literacy as necessary and retains primacy over private capital.
https://thebaffler.com/salvos/we-used-to-read-things-in-this-country-mccormack
https://thebaffler.com/salvos/we-used-to-read-things-in-this-country-mccormack
The Baffler
We Used to Read Things in This Country
Technology changes us—and it is currently changing us for the worse.
The government agency tasked with enforcing the nation’s labor laws and protecting the interests of its workers was now posting stark, black and white propaganda images announcing that “globalism has failed” and “your homeland is calling,” along with Christian religious content insisting upon “One Nation Under God.” Earlier this month, the full force of its far-right turn was made clear in a post that read “One Homeland. One People. One Heritage. Remember who you are, American.” As many commenters pointed out, the phrasing recalls the Nazi slogan “Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer,” or “one people, one realm, one leader.” This one raised alarm bells far beyond the comment section.
https://thebaffler.com/latest/a-piece-of-work-kelly
https://thebaffler.com/latest/a-piece-of-work-kelly
The Baffler
A Piece of Work
Workers can no longer count on the Department of Labor.
In December 2025, NASA let the Perseverance rover drive using AI-generated waypoints for two days on Mars, covering 456 meters without direct human control. The system analyzed orbital images and terrain data to identify hazards and plan a safe route, which the rover then executed with its onboard autonomous navigation.
Because of the long communication delay between Earth and Mars, rovers already operate semi-independently. This test shows how generative AI could further streamline navigation, reduce operator workload, and enable longer, more efficient drives.
NASA sees this as a step toward more advanced autonomous exploration—supporting future Mars missions, drone swarms, and projects like Dragonfly to Titan, where intelligent onboard systems will be essential.
https://www.universetoday.com/articles/nasa-let-ai-drive-the-perseverance-rover-for-two-days
Because of the long communication delay between Earth and Mars, rovers already operate semi-independently. This test shows how generative AI could further streamline navigation, reduce operator workload, and enable longer, more efficient drives.
NASA sees this as a step toward more advanced autonomous exploration—supporting future Mars missions, drone swarms, and projects like Dragonfly to Titan, where intelligent onboard systems will be essential.
https://www.universetoday.com/articles/nasa-let-ai-drive-the-perseverance-rover-for-two-days
Universe Today
NASA Let AI Drive The Perseverance Rover For Two Days
NASA has taken another step towards greater autonomy for planetary exploration rovers. In December, the space agency used AI to generate waypoints for Perseverance's route on two separate days. The rover drove more than 450 meters without human input.