Most wildlife crimes in Europe go unpunished or undetected, says a brand-new report https://perma.cc/RWK4-LWKC

According to the report, which analyses data from the period 2016-2020, most of these crimes in Europe were related to the illegal killing of wildlife (27%), the use of poisoned baits (16%) or prohibited methods and equipment for hunting (14%), and the illegal wildlife trade (13%) https://perma.cc/RWK4-LWKC

Less than 7% of recorded cases of wildlife crime between 2015 and 2020 ended with a court sentence, according to a report by WWF Spain https://perma.cc/A3YM-663G

Some examples of illegal wildlife trade are well known, such as poaching of elephants for ivory and tigers for their skins and bones https://perma.cc/P749-WY6B

Wildlife crimes, such as illegal killing, poisoning, trapping or illegal trade of species constitute a major threat to many of the planet’s species. In fact, unsustainable and illegal wildlife trade and other types of wildlife crimes are the second biggest direct threat to species, after habitat loss https://perma.cc/KGH8-A3Y4

The value of illegal trade has been estimated at between $7 and $23 billion per year, making wildlife crime one of the most lucrative illegal businesses, often run by sophisticated, international, and well-organized criminal networks seeking to exploit the high rewards and low risks of the trade https://perma.cc/L7L7-8GP3

urge the UK Government to prioritise wildlife crime https://perma.cc/3YP6-DD7Y

More
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1324
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1323
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AnimalFreaks/1322

Figure 3 shows the CO2 emissions of the 17 countries and their CAGR for the period 1990 and 2016. The countries that accounted for the highest growth in CO2 emissions between 1990 and 2016 are China with 6.17%, India with 5.5%, Saudi Arabia with 5%, Iran with 4.8%, Brazil with 4%, and Turkey with 3.7%. The countries that have managed to rein in their emissions growth are UK with −1.16%, Italy with −1.1%, France with −0.88%, the USA with 0.33%, Japan with 0.41%, and Canada with 0.9%.

Delaying carbon dioxide removal in the European Union puts climate targets at risk. Under an indicative target of −50 Gt of net CO2 by 2100, delayed CDR would cost an extra of 0.12−0.19 trillion EUR per year of inaction. Moreover, postponing CDR beyond mid-century would substantially reduce the removal potential to almost half (−35.60 Gt CO2) due to the underused biomass and land resources and the maximum technology diffusion speed.

For example, reaching carbon neutrality by 2100 by deploying BECCS and DACCS from 2020 would cost 22.8 trillion EUR2015 (in the range 18.6–26.6, uncertainty analysis in the Supplementary Tables 43–50), and 24.1 when starting in 2075 (18.2–29.5), while it would become infeasible when starting after 2080.