George Bush started two decades-long ground wars and opened up immigration significantly after 9/11; his father HW Bush signed the Immigration Acts of 1990 & 1991 and started two other wars. Trump has cut off and cut down immigration in a large way; he launched precision strikes on an adversary with zero war started or refugees invited.

The Retard Right cannot tell the difference—that same Right couldn't save its own country without Trump, either, otherwise these people whining would have done something in the last 30 years.

America has labeled India with a Level 2 safety risk; it includes a warning for women not to go there because of 'rampant sexual assault'. Were I working in the State Dept this would really earn them a spot on the Travel Ban list, if the hygiene and scamming hadn't already.

Muslim friend of Fuentes says browns will 'inevitably' win against Whites and makes fun of White Christians. At least he's 'based' about Israel(?)

Undoing this is what matters. Achieving justice for the nations, like Canada and New Zealand, who have undergone this kind of evil is what matters. If you put petty religious views, ideological opinions or 'based takes' about geopolitics above this, you're a traitor.

Vance: "We have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have no interest in boots on the ground."

2017

2018

2019.

He's borrowing my noscript, but I agree

Trump's pattern is to make a rather high demand, gauge the reaction of his adversary, try to intimidate and isolate them if they respond negatively, pull them in with nice offers of ending the tension. Many are under the impression that, in the Middle East, he is 'acting on behalf of Israel', this view neglects how he does the same thing with everyone.

The argument that Zionist interests influence both sides is understandable. But, what matters is the actual results. Joe Biden has been an aggressive defender of Israel for over 50 years, receiving 11x more zionist money than Trump. Hillary raised 40x what Trump did at one point and spent 2x what he did in 2016, she lost.

So far, Harris has twice the funding and full support from Soros, but Trump's support is disproportionately from decent White people, Adelson aside. Harris does not oppose Israel, she wants mass amnesty, and she praised the original bill to give Israel 3 billion a year. Behind that bill was president Obama, who was significantly more pro-Israel than Trump.

Uniquely, Obama was at war his entire presidency. Trump, in contrast, ended wars, made deals, and started no new wars. In all, Trump is actually worse for Israel. He only gave them symbolic gestures, barely added to the money Obama signed off, and will not fight Iran. The notion that both outcomes are the same is demoralised delusion.

Ignoring the provocative wording I am firmly confident what I said here will still hold up. Getting involved in a greater conflict does not fit the Agenda and would disrupt domestic reform (unless going to war gives us the emergency powers to deport more and faster, which is the only reason I'd support it besides serious threats to the country).

This is ultimately the most important issue: emptying the country of its infestation and keeping the rate of replacement low-to-reversible, if not fully negative. The administration continues to deliver record results and has to accelerate. When more zoomers and agreeable millennials are in positions of relevance, the reins of these efforts can be taken to a greater extent. That's the goal, if things are going to happen 'legally'.

Iran launched a 'symbolic retaliation', which hurt no one and damaged nothing. This looks like another clear sign that there is no war happening.