He's borrowing my noscript, but I agree

Trump's pattern is to make a rather high demand, gauge the reaction of his adversary, try to intimidate and isolate them if they respond negatively, pull them in with nice offers of ending the tension. Many are under the impression that, in the Middle East, he is 'acting on behalf of Israel', this view neglects how he does the same thing with everyone.

The argument that Zionist interests influence both sides is understandable. But, what matters is the actual results. Joe Biden has been an aggressive defender of Israel for over 50 years, receiving 11x more zionist money than Trump. Hillary raised 40x what Trump did at one point and spent 2x what he did in 2016, she lost.

So far, Harris has twice the funding and full support from Soros, but Trump's support is disproportionately from decent White people, Adelson aside. Harris does not oppose Israel, she wants mass amnesty, and she praised the original bill to give Israel 3 billion a year. Behind that bill was president Obama, who was significantly more pro-Israel than Trump.

Uniquely, Obama was at war his entire presidency. Trump, in contrast, ended wars, made deals, and started no new wars. In all, Trump is actually worse for Israel. He only gave them symbolic gestures, barely added to the money Obama signed off, and will not fight Iran. The notion that both outcomes are the same is demoralised delusion.

Ignoring the provocative wording I am firmly confident what I said here will still hold up. Getting involved in a greater conflict does not fit the Agenda and would disrupt domestic reform (unless going to war gives us the emergency powers to deport more and faster, which is the only reason I'd support it besides serious threats to the country).

This is ultimately the most important issue: emptying the country of its infestation and keeping the rate of replacement low-to-reversible, if not fully negative. The administration continues to deliver record results and has to accelerate. When more zoomers and agreeable millennials are in positions of relevance, the reins of these efforts can be taken to a greater extent. That's the goal, if things are going to happen 'legally'.

Iran launched a 'symbolic retaliation', which hurt no one and damaged nothing. This looks like another clear sign that there is no war happening.

"Fire up the deportation planes" — Department of Homeland Security

Massive truthnuke detonated today

2019

2025. Dreams can come true.

Muslims invaded Europe several times across the span of 1400 years. Spain was taken over and the Ottomans reached into Austria. I get the point he's trying to make, but Muslims don't come here because of the 'turmoil', they come because they want to exploit. Jewish (and Catholic, significantly more) NGOs take advantage of their desire to move, they did not introduce the desire.

The non-White world has, for as long as the worlds have interacted, never not tried to expand itself into the White world. This would be the case with or without Jews helping them, hold all groups accountable or you end up making your own group lack agency.

Japan's government and its diaspora, that of the most beloved non-White today, pushed for open borders in 1924—urging Canada, America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe to be more accepting of Asians, including Indians.

It should go without saying that all foreign ethnics not only fight for their in-group but try to subvert the host.

German and Irish immigrants, no offense to them, formed voting blocs and alliances to oust Anglo-Saxon interests in big cities. Italians and Jews and Poles coordinated their mafias to get around American policemen—the original police force in America was created after the 1830s, to deal with migrants.

Jews, having worse narcissism and less reason to feign assimilation, outdid all of these White or white-adjacent groups in their objective, having a much longer history of being strangers in others' states.

Each foreign Ethnic has its own desires at the top of its heart, and often uses unfair means and selfish collectivism to fulfill them.

The George Floyd of Italians was 'Nicola and Bart', convicted robbers and murders whom large swaths of the Italian community marched in the streets to defend. Mussolini even came out to voice support for these criminals. Decades later, an Italian mayor in New Jersey and a Greek in New York tried to exonerate them for experiencing 'prejudice'.

Likewise the George Floyd of Jews is Leo Frank, a child murderer who was justly lynched by Americans after they were certain of his guilt, whom the ADL was formed to protect. Jews still swear of his innocence today, 100yrs later.