Netsec – Telegram
Netsec
7.42K subscribers
22.4K links
This channel posts the feed from r/netsec.
For any suggestions dm @streaak
Donate to keep the bot running https://www.paypal.me/akhilgv
Download Telegram
Spectrum has no clue about KRACK wpa2 wi-fi vulnerability?
Just spoke to them on the phone and got the response "I haven't heard anything about that."Anyone here deal with Spectrum or another internet provider about this issue and get a reasonable response?

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 04:37AM by NoMuddyFeet
via reddit http://ift.tt/2Hq14aI
dprobe: An automated docker security auditing tool written in go with support for Slack output
http://ift.tt/2Hs0KrU

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 02:43AM by bbb31
via reddit http://ift.tt/2p6qYcR
Regaxor: Fuzzing Regexes for Fun and Not-So-Much Profit
http://ift.tt/2FxFch5

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 05:53AM by ackro_
via reddit http://ift.tt/2Ikcjm6
5 Important Security tips for Android
http://ift.tt/2FCX6uP

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 06:56AM by Tracyuao
via reddit http://ift.tt/2FzHFr2
Direct Memory Access (DMA) Attack Software - Map Processes to Files and Folders - DMA over PCIe (No Drivers Needed on Target System) - [Full Sources and Binaries]
http://ift.tt/2Hr5IF7

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 08:11AM by TechLord2
via reddit http://ift.tt/2tGJblU
What does information security, sports management, military history, & Batman have in common? Find out on the 2nd episode of Humans of InfoSec as Caroline Wong talks with Robert Wood about his origin story.
http://ift.tt/2FBaxv3

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 05:34PM by ju1i3k
via reddit http://ift.tt/2FNv2Ik
[Thought Experiment] Do we need online laws?
Are internet laws necessary? The laws are clearly not a primary barrier for serious criminals, but they do present a problem for less-damaging people and less-damaging behaviour.Internet laws caused Gary McKinnon a decade of serious anxiety when he was prosecuted for looking at someone else's information, but it seems that the law was irrelevant to anyone's safety - whether or not he was prosecuted the military who held the information clearly needed better security.It's also clear that those who have a greater ability to harm others through the internet (data theft, remote encryption, et c.) are also those who are the least easily targetable by internet laws (due to some combination of skill and location).Every time I see someone being targeted by some online attack, my first piece of advice is to change their behaviour, and my attempts to contact authorities on the matter have been met with understandable apathy. Internet security advice seems necessarily geared towards something like 'victim-blaming'.I'll add the personal gripe that I've started learning about security a few months ago, and it seems the early port-scan I performed for my education was illegal (nobody cares, but technically it's sometimes illegal). The first problem here is that non-obvious laws are inherently going to be a pain. The second problem is that while I have the funds to make a virtual network for practice (and I have), not everyone has the funds, and criminalizing kids who just want to learn about networking seems like it's not worth the safety such laws buy.So, I must wonder if internet laws are required at all.Disclaimer 1: I'm not suggesting theft or plotting murders should be legal when they're on the internet. I'm wondering what would happen if logging into a remote server were legal, while copying files from that server would still be illegal due to non internet-based laws.Disclaimer 2: This is not an argumentative thesis, it's a thought-experiment. I have no idea if this is feasible but would love to hear people's thoughts.

Submitted March 13, 2018 at 06:21PM by Andonome
via reddit http://ift.tt/2p98ZBw