Canon LXV of the Holy Apostles:
"If any clergymen, or laymen, enter a synagogue of Jews, or of heretics, to pray, let him be both deposed and excommunicated."
"If any clergymen, or laymen, enter a synagogue of Jews, or of heretics, to pray, let him be both deposed and excommunicated."
🔥1
Fourth Lateran Council : 1215
21. On yearly confession to one’s own priest, yearly communion, the confessional seal
If any persons wish, for good reasons, to confess their sins to another priest let them first ask and obtain the permission of their own priest; for otherwise the other priest will not have the power to absolve or to bind them.
21. On yearly confession to one’s own priest, yearly communion, the confessional seal
If any persons wish, for good reasons, to confess their sins to another priest let them first ask and obtain the permission of their own priest; for otherwise the other priest will not have the power to absolve or to bind them.
Can. 515 §1. A parish is a certain community of the Christian faithful stably constituted in a particular church, whose pastoral care is entrusted to a pastor (parochus) as its proper pastor (pastor) under the authority of the diocesan bishop.
I believe what the traditionalist Roman Catholics want is for the Pope to retain all of his power but do what they want.
Even if the next Pope was to come to power and do everything they wanted, there are no check and balances in Roman Catholicism to keep another Pope Francis from coming to power or another Vatican 2 from occurring.
Even if the next Pope was to come to power and do everything they wanted, there are no check and balances in Roman Catholicism to keep another Pope Francis from coming to power or another Vatican 2 from occurring.
If you have to recover or return to your religions teaching/tradition, you are in a difficult situation and should question if it was ever true to begin with.
I'm thinking of the traditionalist or RadTrad Roman Catholics when I say this. Including SSPX, FSSP, and everyone in between that questions Roman Catholic teaching, especially after Vatican 2 while staying Roman Catholic
I'm thinking of the traditionalist or RadTrad Roman Catholics when I say this. Including SSPX, FSSP, and everyone in between that questions Roman Catholic teaching, especially after Vatican 2 while staying Roman Catholic
Those who say that infancy has nothing in it for Jesus to save, are denying that Christ is Jesus for all believing infants. Those, I repeat, who say that infancy has nothing in it for Jesus to save, are saying nothing else than that for believing infants, infants that is who have been baptized in Christ, Christ the Lord is not Jesus. After all, what is Jesus? Jesus means Savior. Jesus is the Savior. Those whom he doesn’t save, having nothing to save in them, well for them he isn’t Jesus. Well now, if you can tolerate the idea that Christ is not Jesus for some persons who have been baptized, then I’m not sure your faith can be recognized as according with the sound rule. Yes, they’re infants, but they are his members. They’re infants, but they receive his sacraments. They are infants, but they share in his table, in order to have life in themselves.”
Augustine, Sermon 174, 7
Augustine, Sermon 174, 7