Forwarded from Ratfinks
War Crimes, such as Crimes Against Humanity, cannot be charged for offenses that occurred before conflict began BUT...
"...the United States could not institute a military tribunal within its own jurisdiction to pass upon violations of the laws and customs of war, unless such violations were committed upon American persons or American property..."
War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity [traitors/spies violating the Constitution: census, voting, apportionment] on American property or people allows for military tribunals.
To charge Crimes Against Humanity before the conflict began, it must have been executed within jurisdiction of the tribunal, aka American property or people.
"...the United States could not institute a military tribunal within its own jurisdiction to pass upon violations of the laws and customs of war, unless such violations were committed upon American persons or American property..."
War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity [traitors/spies violating the Constitution: census, voting, apportionment] on American property or people allows for military tribunals.
To charge Crimes Against Humanity before the conflict began, it must have been executed within jurisdiction of the tribunal, aka American property or people.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
continuing...
Why were Nazi atrocities not "Crimes Against Humanity" before the war began?
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Basically, the deep state can be charged for Crimes Against Humanity prior to military occupation from the earliest point that crimes can be *proven* to have knowingly occurred on American people or soil and against the Constitution. No statute of limitations.
Census fraud [knowingly] by foreign infiltrators to apportion unconstitutionally House representatives, unbalanced and unfairly, to make laws and commit election fraud.
Why were Nazi atrocities not "Crimes Against Humanity" before the war began?
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Basically, the deep state can be charged for Crimes Against Humanity prior to military occupation from the earliest point that crimes can be *proven* to have knowingly occurred on American people or soil and against the Constitution. No statute of limitations.
Census fraud [knowingly] by foreign infiltrators to apportion unconstitutionally House representatives, unbalanced and unfairly, to make laws and commit election fraud.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/myanmar-court-ahead-suu-kyi-corruption-trial-84931916
ABC News
Myanmar court gives go-ahead for Suu Kyi corruption trial
A court in Myanmar has ruled that a corruption trial for ousted leader Aung San Suu Kyi and three political colleagues will continue after finding that prosecutors presented sufficient evidence for their indictment
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Possible Law of War connect.
Timestamp 11:55 > page 1155
Lieber Code is the first law of war publication for the US armed forces.
Pulitzer Prize > PP
PP status withdrawn? Someone was found to be a spy and lost protected status, now an unprivilaged belligerent? 🤔
Timestamp 11:55 > page 1155
Lieber Code is the first law of war publication for the US armed forces.
Pulitzer Prize > PP
PP status withdrawn? Someone was found to be a spy and lost protected status, now an unprivilaged belligerent? 🤔
Forwarded from Ratfinks
From the UN Security Council meeting on May 13, 2022:
Project 3007: pathogens to incapacitate potentially being spread through water
https://www.un.org/press/en/2022/sc14890.doc.htm
Project 3007: pathogens to incapacitate potentially being spread through water
https://www.un.org/press/en/2022/sc14890.doc.htm
Ratfinks
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/myanmar-court-ahead-suu-kyi-corruption-trial-84931916
With the judge's ok to proceed, now we go to the UN. What timing. Can't let the world know she was in league with Obama and Clinton and Soros.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/family-of-myanmars-suu-kyi-files-detention-complaint-with-un.html/amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/family-of-myanmars-suu-kyi-files-detention-complaint-with-un.html/amp
The Irrawaddy
Family of Myanmar’s Suu Kyi Files Detention Complaint With UN
Lawyers for relatives of the military-ousted State Counselor described her detention by the junta as ‘judicial kidnapping’.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Definitely plausible that the deep state is detained.
Deep state situation must not be adversely affected. In other words, they can continue with their propaganda and shenanigans for the time being. They are restrained from doing permanent harm, though, but will try.
Deep state situation must not be adversely affected. In other words, they can continue with their propaganda and shenanigans for the time being. They are restrained from doing permanent harm, though, but will try.
Forwarded from Mel Q 🐸 (Mel Q)
I have made some updates to my book and I have also updated the link.
I have compiled my recent blogs/decodes into one PDF.
Queen Elizabeth-II & the Wallenberg's are at the top of the Cabal pyramid they pull the Deep State puppet strings!
And now their secrets are out!
Please help me to get the word out. Thank you!
For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. -Luke 12:2
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3h88wlb48xqkase/The%20Little%20Book%20of%20Q%20-v2.pdf?dl=0
or https://rb.gy/yxqjpv
I have compiled my recent blogs/decodes into one PDF.
Queen Elizabeth-II & the Wallenberg's are at the top of the Cabal pyramid they pull the Deep State puppet strings!
And now their secrets are out!
Please help me to get the word out. Thank you!
For there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; neither hid, that shall not be known. -Luke 12:2
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3h88wlb48xqkase/The%20Little%20Book%20of%20Q%20-v2.pdf?dl=0
or https://rb.gy/yxqjpv
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Trump timestamp 8:05 AM > Drop 805 > mirror 508 > Law of War page 508 "Detention"
Kellyanne Conway > KC > 11.3 "End of Occupation"
Law of War mentions military occupation.
Deep state is being detained. Occupying Power are Protected Persons. Special agreements are made for them to travel and must not adversely affect their situation. They are allowed to further their cause per the Law of War even though they are detained.
"Why are the above...highly protected?"
Above > PPs > Occupying Power
Protected per the Law of War. They have certain rights under the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Occupying Power (fraudulent government) can pass laws and spend money to benefit their cause but not make and permanent changes while America is under military occupation.
Kellyanne Conway > KC > 11.3 "End of Occupation"
Law of War mentions military occupation.
Deep state is being detained. Occupying Power are Protected Persons. Special agreements are made for them to travel and must not adversely affect their situation. They are allowed to further their cause per the Law of War even though they are detained.
"Why are the above...highly protected?"
Above > PPs > Occupying Power
Protected per the Law of War. They have certain rights under the Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Occupying Power (fraudulent government) can pass laws and spend money to benefit their cause but not make and permanent changes while America is under military occupation.