Forwarded from Ratfinks
continuing...
Why were Nazi atrocities not "Crimes Against Humanity" before the war began?
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Basically, the deep state can be charged for Crimes Against Humanity prior to military occupation from the earliest point that crimes can be *proven* to have knowingly occurred on American people or soil and against the Constitution. No statute of limitations.
Census fraud [knowingly] by foreign infiltrators to apportion unconstitutionally House representatives, unbalanced and unfairly, to make laws and commit election fraud.
Why were Nazi atrocities not "Crimes Against Humanity" before the war began?
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Basically, the deep state can be charged for Crimes Against Humanity prior to military occupation from the earliest point that crimes can be *proven* to have knowingly occurred on American people or soil and against the Constitution. No statute of limitations.
Census fraud [knowingly] by foreign infiltrators to apportion unconstitutionally House representatives, unbalanced and unfairly, to make laws and commit election fraud.
Ratfinks
Timestamp is 7:14 AM Statute of Limitations standing out a lot this week. Thought of something...
People are saying precedent is being set by prosecution past the statute of limitations. That's not accurate. Breaking the law doesn't set precedent but people are speaking that way. "Breaking the law" does not equal "changing the law."
Breakdown:
People who don't understand Military Occupation will not understand war crime jurisdiction.
People understand statute of limitations and other legal jargon. It's likely a PSYOP/propaganda building up to make people understand former presidents and others being treated the same as Trump, thus being able to be charged for crimes long past.
Actual crimes and tribunals to be held 11.3 and include much more than the public will readily understand.
Breakdown:
People who don't understand Military Occupation will not understand war crime jurisdiction.
People understand statute of limitations and other legal jargon. It's likely a PSYOP/propaganda building up to make people understand former presidents and others being treated the same as Trump, thus being able to be charged for crimes long past.
Actual crimes and tribunals to be held 11.3 and include much more than the public will readily understand.
👍2
Forwarded from Insider Paper
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: House Speaker Kevin McCarthy greets the President of Taiwan
READ: https://t.co/ji4LvZSeGW
Follow Insider Paper for more news
READ: https://t.co/ji4LvZSeGW
Follow Insider Paper for more news
Interesting point I'm now going to consider would be how China will legally invade Taiwan. 🤔
Need to review. McCarthy said he was arming Taiwan. That is agression, as with Ukraine.
And China is not NATO so maybe another UN Charter overlap.
Need to review. McCarthy said he was arming Taiwan. That is agression, as with Ukraine.
And China is not NATO so maybe another UN Charter overlap.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
https://www.rt.com/news/574270-china-taiwan-us-mccarthy/
China identifies ‘first red line’ in US relations
China identifies ‘first red line’ in US relations
RT
China identifies ‘first red line’ in US relations
The Taiwan issue is the “first red line” that shouldn’t be crossed in bilateral relations, Beijing has said
Forwarded from Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸 (Karli Bonne)
She was hit multiple times by a guy in a dress': Terrified Riley Gaines is ambushed by screaming trans activists who 'physically attacked her' after swimming champion delivered speech on saving women's sports at San Francisco State University
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11949057/Terrified-Riley-Gaines-ambushed-screaming-trans-activists-physically-attacked-her.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11949057/Terrified-Riley-Gaines-ambushed-screaming-trans-activists-physically-attacked-her.html
Mail Online
Terrified swimming champion Riley Gaines is ambushed by screaming trans activists and 'hit twice by guy in a dress' after Saving…
Gaines' husband, Louis Barker, said he had brief conversations with his wife while she was locked in the room for nearly three hours.
Forwarded from Masey
So the drop states 50, 50, 50 = 150 years ago….
And guess what happened 150 years ago?!?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/04/nyregion/ulysses-grant-trump-arrest.html
And guess what happened 150 years ago?!?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/04/nyregion/ulysses-grant-trump-arrest.html