Timestamp 1:27 AM > Law of War page 127
Civilians may not be made the object of attack, 4.8.2 unless they take direct part in hostilities.
Civilians who engage in hostilities thereby forfeit the corresponding protections of civilian status and may be liable to treatment in one or more respects as unprivileged belligerents.
Civilians may not be made the object of attack, 4.8.2 unless they take direct part in hostilities.
Civilians who engage in hostilities thereby forfeit the corresponding protections of civilian status and may be liable to treatment in one or more respects as unprivileged belligerents.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Flynn timestamp 12:24 AM > Mirror 4221
"We are being attacked from within" connects to vaccinated people, as vast majority of hospitalizations.
Law of War chapter 6.11
Covid (Biological Weapon/Prohibited) and "Vaccines" (Weapons intended to injure the human body by penetrating, not detectable by Xrays/Prohibited)
"We are being attacked from within" connects to vaccinated people, as vast majority of hospitalizations.
Law of War chapter 6.11
Covid (Biological Weapon/Prohibited) and "Vaccines" (Weapons intended to injure the human body by penetrating, not detectable by Xrays/Prohibited)
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Flynn timestamp 11:05 AM > Drop 1105 > Law of War page 1105
Big one here. From what I can gather...
War Crimes have no jurisdiction. They are considered "universal".
War Crimes, such as Crimes Against Humanity, cannot be charged for offenses that occurred before conflict began.
"...the United States could not institute a military tribunal within its own jurisdiction to pass upon violations of the laws and customs of war, unless such violations were committed upon American persons or American property..."
War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity [masking children, vaccines, Covid biological weapon, China election interference, etc] on American property or people allows for military tribunals.
To charge Crimes Against Humanity before conflict began, it must have been executed within jurisdiction of the tribunal, aka American property or people.
Big one here. From what I can gather...
War Crimes have no jurisdiction. They are considered "universal".
War Crimes, such as Crimes Against Humanity, cannot be charged for offenses that occurred before conflict began.
"...the United States could not institute a military tribunal within its own jurisdiction to pass upon violations of the laws and customs of war, unless such violations were committed upon American persons or American property..."
War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity [masking children, vaccines, Covid biological weapon, China election interference, etc] on American property or people allows for military tribunals.
To charge Crimes Against Humanity before conflict began, it must have been executed within jurisdiction of the tribunal, aka American property or people.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
continuing...
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Arizona Audit, Wuhan Lab, NWO...drip, drip, flood. Evidence must be shown. It must be *satisfactorily proven* that there was interference, a biological attack, etc and that these were *in fact* War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity *on America* before the military can act.
“To constitute Crimes against Humanity, the acts relied on before the outbreak of war must have been in execution of, or in connection with, any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The Tribunal is of the opinion that revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were, it has not been *satisfactorily proved* that they were done in execution of, or in connection with, any such crime. The Tribunal therefore cannot make a general declaration that the acts before 1939 were Crimes against Humanity within the meaning of the Charter, but from the beginning of the war in 1939 War Crimes were committed on a vast scale, which were also Crimes against Humanity;"
Arizona Audit, Wuhan Lab, NWO...drip, drip, flood. Evidence must be shown. It must be *satisfactorily proven* that there was interference, a biological attack, etc and that these were *in fact* War Crimes/Crimes Against Humanity *on America* before the military can act.