Ratfinks
Law of War, Chapter 1.5 "War" as a Legal Concept "As a legal concept, “war” has traditionally been viewed as a condition in which a State is prosecuting its rights by military force, usually against another State. However, the precise definition of “war”…
From footnote 68:
"...a state of war may exist prior to or subsequent to the use of force."
--Democrats staged an insurrection on January 6th.
--They arrested people, calling it an "insurrection" (though not charged).
--If in fact this is being called an insurrection, that would make January 6th prisoners "POWs".
--POWs are being mistreated. This is a war crime.
"...a state of war may exist prior to or subsequent to the use of force."
--Democrats staged an insurrection on January 6th.
--They arrested people, calling it an "insurrection" (though not charged).
--If in fact this is being called an insurrection, that would make January 6th prisoners "POWs".
--POWs are being mistreated. This is a war crime.
Forwarded from General Flynn ️
Long, but read in full…this is an affidavit for a court of law.
This is why any attempt from OSHA to put forth "temporary" emergency rules regarding vaccines* will fail in court.
Vaccines* aren't "temporary". They alter your body permanently (and there is nothing more permanent than death). Without a method to "remove the temporary" from people's bodies, they are DOA.
Vaccines* aren't "temporary". They alter your body permanently (and there is nothing more permanent than death). Without a method to "remove the temporary" from people's bodies, they are DOA.
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
JUST IN - Sun blasts X1-class solar flare, CME to hit Earth very likely.
This is the second major X-class flare of Solar Cycle 25. This X1-flare (X9 highest) can cause radio interference and lead to mid-latitude auroras.
@disclosetv
This is the second major X-class flare of Solar Cycle 25. This X1-flare (X9 highest) can cause radio interference and lead to mid-latitude auroras.
@disclosetv
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Flynn timestamp 8:26 > LoW page 826
One line at top, page 825 included for full context, but the footnote is interesting.
"The occupant" refers to the Occupying Power though shortened terminology could be referring to "The resident" [Joe].
In regards to the former, the OP has a right to make sure funds are not put to "hostile use", aka Antifa, D5/CKs, other expenditures?
In regards to the latter, Joe ran away with the infrastructure bill in disarray. Also says they're not authorized to use the money outside of the law.
One line at top, page 825 included for full context, but the footnote is interesting.
"The occupant" refers to the Occupying Power though shortened terminology could be referring to "The resident" [Joe].
In regards to the former, the OP has a right to make sure funds are not put to "hostile use", aka Antifa, D5/CKs, other expenditures?
In regards to the latter, Joe ran away with the infrastructure bill in disarray. Also says they're not authorized to use the money outside of the law.