16.5.1
Necessity of war is required to attack civilian infrastructure. Civilian targets MUST be considered a military objective.

16.5.1 .1
Proportionality must be used to avoid excess damage.

Furthermore, chapter 5.5 is referenced in the footnote. "Prohibition on Attacks...to Cause Excessive Incidental Harm". Assuming the ISIS attack was deep state, they violated the Law of War in killing many women & children.

16.5.2
Brief internet & communication disruption is NOT regarded as a use of force. This means the CME FF communication blackout will violate indiscriminate harm protections and constitute an attack of force, allowing the military to respond with force against the deep state. Attacks must be directed and considered objrctives.

16.5.5
Civilians can be used by the military for their expertise. Many high profile names, and likely some not named, are helping with Dominion election fraud.

16.6
Communication blackout initiated by the deep state does not target directly, thus a Law of War violation.

17:7 > LoW chapter 17.7
"Rules on Conducting Attacks in NIAC"
(Non-International Armed Conflict)

Footnote refers to chapter 5.5 "Discrimination in Conducting Attacks". Feel like this 5.5 is important. Possibly saying everything the DS is doing in terms of Covid, election fraud, etc is a violation per proportionality.

And read footnote 120 > timestamp 1:20 PM

In NIAC, no basis exists for attacks to the power grid. 😳 Fits more and more with previous layouts, Cyber Ops and proportionality, that the DS cannot cause a blackout without seriously violating the Law of War.

To summarize:

The US had ultimate credible evidence that Russia was going to make a video to start a war until that info was deliberately leaked to the US by Russia to trick them into thinking they were going to make a video, but that doesn't mean they were NOT going to make a video or think about making one.
😂😂😂😂😂

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/could-us-intel-of-russias-false-flag-in-ukraine-be-part-of-putins-plan/ar-AATBsLg