Forwarded from Ratfinks
Timestamp 6:19 PM > Drop 619
Also military time 1819 > Law of War chapter 18.19
"Discipline in National Jurisdictions of Individuals For Violations of The Law of War"
Romans 12:17-21 > Law of War pages (11)17 to (11)21 of which chapter 18.19 is on.
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA)
Per Flynn, NEVER FORGET but "Never take revenge." Q drop asks how Hillary, Soros, and Obama would face trial in a corrupt public setting.
Chapter 18.19 spells this out: UCMJ, MEJA, and the War Crimes Act.
If public settings are too corrupt, these laws allow for non-judicial punishment and tribunals since most war crimes are actually tried under domestic law or military law.
US law Title 18:
"...offenses committed by U.S. nationals on the premises of U.S. diplomatic, consular, military, or other U.S. Government missions or entities in foreign States."
Biological agents are secretly transported under "diplomatic secrecy", a war crime within US territorial jurisdiction.
Also military time 1819 > Law of War chapter 18.19
"Discipline in National Jurisdictions of Individuals For Violations of The Law of War"
Romans 12:17-21 > Law of War pages (11)17 to (11)21 of which chapter 18.19 is on.
Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA)
Per Flynn, NEVER FORGET but "Never take revenge." Q drop asks how Hillary, Soros, and Obama would face trial in a corrupt public setting.
Chapter 18.19 spells this out: UCMJ, MEJA, and the War Crimes Act.
If public settings are too corrupt, these laws allow for non-judicial punishment and tribunals since most war crimes are actually tried under domestic law or military law.
US law Title 18:
"...offenses committed by U.S. nationals on the premises of U.S. diplomatic, consular, military, or other U.S. Government missions or entities in foreign States."
Biological agents are secretly transported under "diplomatic secrecy", a war crime within US territorial jurisdiction.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Space Force timestamp 10:19 AM > Drop 1019 > Law of War page 1019
"Follow the LOOP."
New study talks about Coronal Loops, rings from the sun's corona, are actually an optical illusion.
Solar flares "reported" 3 times this week. CME incoming.
Law of War page 1019 > chapter 16.4 "Cyber Operations and the Law of Neutrality"
Connects to Space Force (Cyber Operations) and Russian special operation in Ukraine (Law of Neutrality violation by NATO States, legally allowing Russian trespass in Ukraine for liberation).
https://scitechdaily.com/coronal-loops-might-not-be-loops-at-all-when-i-saw-the-results-my-mind-exploded/
"Follow the LOOP."
New study talks about Coronal Loops, rings from the sun's corona, are actually an optical illusion.
Solar flares "reported" 3 times this week. CME incoming.
Law of War page 1019 > chapter 16.4 "Cyber Operations and the Law of Neutrality"
Connects to Space Force (Cyber Operations) and Russian special operation in Ukraine (Law of Neutrality violation by NATO States, legally allowing Russian trespass in Ukraine for liberation).
https://scitechdaily.com/coronal-loops-might-not-be-loops-at-all-when-i-saw-the-results-my-mind-exploded/
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Solar flare today.
Something else solar related, too. NASA firing rockets to study the sun. 🤔
https://www.google.com/amp/s/tech.hindustantimes.com/amp/tech/news/wow-nasa-to-do-a-first-shoot-rockets-at-northern-lights-today-reveal-truth-behind-solar-storms-71648029614744.html
Something else solar related, too. NASA firing rockets to study the sun. 🤔
https://www.google.com/amp/s/tech.hindustantimes.com/amp/tech/news/wow-nasa-to-do-a-first-shoot-rockets-at-northern-lights-today-reveal-truth-behind-solar-storms-71648029614744.html
Forwarded from Intel Slava
🇺🇲🇷🇺⚡NATO will not deploy troops in Ukraine to avoid war with Russia - Alliance Secretary General Stoltenberg, responding to Poland's proposal to send a peacekeeping mission to Ukraine.
Forwarded from Ratfinks
Here's how I understand it:
The US is a country with states, as in provinces or territories with individual governments but under a larger government.
NATO is an alliance of states via a treaty, as in a union of countries (also called states but in different context).
If the US sends military into Mexico, it's an invasion by the US. If they're from Texas, it's the US. If they're from California, it's still the entire US. This is not the case with NATO.
If NATO sends troops to Mexico it would matter who they are connected to since there is no NATO military. It is an organization of military from multiple countries. Per the Law of War, though an alliance of nations, each country is bound to individual obligations via their own respective government and laws. "An attack on one is an attack on all", therefore "An attack by one is an attack by all". This is inconsistent since NATO is not a country with a military.
NATO is not party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions but member states are parties to the Geneva Conventions. They are obligated to respect them "in all circumstances". Therefore, if NATO is requesting 1949 Geneva Convention violations, or Law of War violations, then it is up to the nations to refuse.
The US is a country with states, as in provinces or territories with individual governments but under a larger government.
NATO is an alliance of states via a treaty, as in a union of countries (also called states but in different context).
If the US sends military into Mexico, it's an invasion by the US. If they're from Texas, it's the US. If they're from California, it's still the entire US. This is not the case with NATO.
If NATO sends troops to Mexico it would matter who they are connected to since there is no NATO military. It is an organization of military from multiple countries. Per the Law of War, though an alliance of nations, each country is bound to individual obligations via their own respective government and laws. "An attack on one is an attack on all", therefore "An attack by one is an attack by all". This is inconsistent since NATO is not a country with a military.
NATO is not party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions but member states are parties to the Geneva Conventions. They are obligated to respect them "in all circumstances". Therefore, if NATO is requesting 1949 Geneva Convention violations, or Law of War violations, then it is up to the nations to refuse.