The same thing happened in America when Jews like Stanley Fish and Jacques Derrida took over literary criticism in the 1970s. https://theguardian.com/education/2024/dec/05/the-guardian-view-on-humanities-in-universities-closing-english-literature-courses-signals-a-crisis

A wave of feminist composition teachers then swept into the first and only approximation of a literature course freshmen would ever have and caused them to vow never to take another lit related course ever again.

This was bad for American academe, but it was especially tragic for England, a country which hated philosophy and paid foreigners to make its music, as Ralph Vaughn Williams pointed out in a series of lectures he gave at Bryn Mawr in the 1930s.

F. R. Leavis, editor of Scrutiny, was one of the few literary critics who actually understood the irreplaceable pedagogical value of literary studies. He and the New Critics were considered the enemy by Fish and his ilk.

Now we are all paying the price, as a wave of cultural illiteracy sweeps away the last vestiges of American and English identity.

For the full story of what happened to literary criticism read that chapter in The Dangers of Beauty.

It looks as if Life Site New has followed Archbishop Vigano into schism

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/archbishop-vigano-the-catholic-church-has-nothing-to-do-with-the-bergoglian-church/

As I have said many times, the main cause of anti-Semitism is Jewish behavior.

https://michaelwest.com.au/report-conflates-australias-wave-of-antisemitism-with-israel-war-critics/

If Elon Musk is so rich, why isn't he smart enough to see that the American People are sick of rich oligarchs ruling them?

Unfortunately, Musk isn't a nominee. So he won't be bound by this memo. https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14237305/Trump-susie-wiles-Cabinet-nominees-social-media.html

He's beholden to no one, a situation that encapsulates the problem Trump faces as he enters office. Will he be able to restore the sovereignty of the American people over the political process?

I agree. In "terrorist" attacks like this, the first suspect is always the FBI, an organization which makes it a practice to contact "lone, deranged gunmen," supply them with encouragement and weapons, and then kill them so that there will never be a trial and investigation which would expose their role.

https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1874544012646043984

Stream Starting!
EMJ Live 103: How many False Flag operations does the FBI have to orchestrate before we stop believing them?


EMJ Live is every Friday at 5:00pm EST
Call In - Telegram: t.me/EMichaelJonesChat?videochat
Cozy: cozy.tv/emichaeljones
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-920885
Twitter: twitter.com/emichaeljones1

EMJ Books: fidelitypress.org

“I don’t believe in courting Mr. Musk’s favor,” he added. “I’m happy to leave that to others.”
https://thehill.com/policy/international/5067453-olaf-scholz-elon-musk-german-elections

No, Scholz is too busy courting the favor of Jews like Anthony Blinken, who forced Germany into a war with Russia and then blew up the Nordstream pipeline.

Put yo chain on, nigga!
https://youtube.com/watch?v=2sqyb2rURyI

Dwight Howard:

But when you’re in the NBA, there are a lot of things you want to say, but you know if you say them, there will be repercussions. You could get into a lot of trouble.

For example, a couple of years ago when I played for the Houston Rockets, I tweeted “Free Palestine,” and I almost got kicked out of the league for it.

I was just trying to figure out why. Before that, I had spoken with some Palestinians who told me about the struggles in their country. I actually went to the movies one day in Houston, and a group of Palestinians approached me. They said, “Hey man, we’re big fans of you. Can we watch the movie with you?” I was like, “Cool.” When I was in Houston—or even in Orlando and other cities I played in—I would take fans to movies, to Main Event, or to events at Dave & Buster's. After the movie, we took pictures, and they asked me to bring awareness to what was going on in their country. Me, having a big heart, thought, "This is the Christian thing to do." So, I tweeted “Free Palestine.”

Less than 10 minutes later, I got a call from the NBA commissioner, agents, people in my foundation, and even folks from Texas, telling me to take it down. They said, “You’re going to get into trouble. You need to delete this tweet.” I was like, “What did I do that was so bad? Can somebody explain this to me?”

For 30 years, Jared Taylor has been turning Jews into white guys so they can continue to wreck our culture under the cloak of invisibility known as the American Renaissance.

For 30 years Jared Taylor has been encouraging confused Protestants who no longer go to church to identify as white by encouraging them to pick up their spears and charge the machine gun nest so that they can be lawfared to death by the "chubby lesbian kike" Roberta Kaplan, which is what happened in the aftermath of the Charlottesville protests.

Now Nick Fuentes is urging the groypers to pick up their spears after Jared Taylor wrecked his conference in Detroit. Mike B., my tech guy, is still waiting for a refund of the $200 he paid to attend.

This is the same deeply conflicted Nick Fuentes who used to chant "Christ is King." Just to be clear, Jared Taylor is a commissar whose job is to ensure that no white boy ever criticizes a Jew. Jared Taylor is a traitor to the very people he purports to defend. Ask David Duke.

If Nick Fuentes wants to support Taylor's grift that is his business. But it's time for him and his followers to grow up, which means resolving their ongoing identity crisis by choosing either to follow Christ the King or to charge the machine gun nest waving their spears. If you had identified unambiguously as Catholic, you would be winning now, just as I won in St. Louis when I foiled Umar's Lee's attempt to turn Catholics into white supremacists.

https://x.com/DelGroyp/status/1876851833907355958

In his book, On the Death of a Civilization (1949), Marcel de Corte distinguishes between the social and the collective in a way that's directly relevant to our discussion of the difference between Catholicism, which he calls the social and I call a category of reality, and racialism, which he calls the collective and I call a category of the mind.

The distinction between the social and the collective corresponds with the distinction between the Church and an internet fantasy.

Marcel de Corte

"The social exists: family, village, city, parish, region… The collective does not exist, except in the imagination. The social exists in the measure that it is organic, since it brings together human beings who live in relationship to each other like organs within a body: thus, the father, mother, children, or also, in the utter simplicity of the relations among themselves, the village blacksmith who patronizes his neighbor the butcher, who in turn shoes his horses at the blacksmith’s. Where there are social interactions, society exists, and social relations are particularly robust when they convey human warmth: this kinship of blood and spirit brings about a fuller social existence than a purely economic relationship governed by the mathematical law do ut des. We note in addition that economic ties, by the very fact of their presence, can lead to more robust social relations. The collective, on the contrary, has no existence other than the representation of itself by an idea, or rather by a poor example of an idea. Where the vitality of social relations weakens, the idea of the collective automatically arises as a model destined to serve as a guide in a chaotic world of monads with no cohesiveness, where social exchanges are reduced to a minimum. But this model does not refer to anything real; beyond the image, there is nothing. It is really enough to think for a moment about the addition of one thing to another, adding then a third, and so on, to get an idea of collectivity. This operation is only carried out in the mind, and nowhere else. Then what results in reality is only an inorganic juxtaposition of multiple units with purely imaginary bonds introduced by abstract thought.

Marcel de Corte, On the Death of a Civilization (1949)

My discussion with Tim Gordon from today. Great conversation.

https://rumble.com/v67l9rg-dr.-e.-michael-jones.html

Poland needs a new government, one which respects the rule of law more than the feelings of Jewish war criminals.

https://x.com/EMichaelJones1/status/1877718569900720311

Going live soon with I, Hypocrite and Corey J. Mahler to discuss being white and Christianity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX4N3FQSZqM

Stream Starting!
EMJ Live 104: Is it Possible to be White and Catholic?

EMJ Live is every Friday at 5:00pm EST
Call In - Telegram: t.me/EMichaelJonesChat?videochat
Cozy: cozy.tv/emichaeljones
Rumble: rumble.com/c/c-920885
Twitter: twitter.com/emichaeljones1

EMJ Books: fidelitypress.org
CW Magazine: culturewars.com

The problem in Montana and Oklahoma and Texas is Christian Zionism. These are the useful idiots, to use Lenin's phrase, who keep sending AIPAC stooges to Washington.

https://x.com/DanielLMcAdams/status/1877573949929738693

This is delusional Jewish propaganda. Shapiro lost whatever credibility he had when he threw all conservative principle to the wind and became a cheerleader for genocide in Gaza.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/how-ben-shapiro-conquered-maga-verse-trump-1236104674/

Finally, the Church stands up for what it is supposed to believe.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/01/13/church-accused-of-hate-crime-after-banning-gay-mayor/

He just won my vote. Should I move to Poland, or should he move here?

https://x.com/tonychtonych/status/1878147156986692027

What follows is a letter I received that beautifully illustrates the points I have been making regarding white boys, race, ethnicity, and Catholicism.

The White Boy Question: A Letter to Dr. E. Michael Jones

Dear Dr. E. Michael Jones,

It is a profound honor to write to you, a man whose work has shaped my understanding of faith, culture, and history since my earliest intellectual awakening. I discovered your insights during my freshman year of high school, long before your ideas gained traction among the younger Gen Z crowd. Back then, I considered myself ahead of the curve—a trailblazer among my peers—because I had already immersed myself in the depth and brilliance of your analyses.

It wasn’t just your lectures and writings that resonated with me; it was your accessibility and kindness that left a lasting impression. When I lost my 2007 edition of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, you didn’t hesitate to help me secure another copy, even offering a discount because you understood its immense value to me as a collector’s item. That small act of generosity solidified my admiration for you—not just as an intellectual giant but as a truly compassionate individual.

My personal journey has made your critique of white identity politics especially relevant. As someone who is mixed-race—my father being of Irish-Italian and Ukrainian descent, and my mother a Dominican woman—I am a living testament to the failure of “white identity” as a coherent or compatible framework within Catholicism.

My father’s life is a perfect example of the hollowness and futility of white identity. He grew up in a deracinated state, disconnected from his ethnic roots, and was never baptized into the Catholic faith. When my brother and I would ask about his heritage, he could only muster vague guesses about being Italian, Irish, and Ukrainian. His sense of self was fractured, a void where tradition and identity should have been.

It was only through his marriage to my Catholic mother—an immigrant from the Dominican Republic—that he found his way to Catholicism. The so-called “taboo” of intermarriage turned out to be a blessing, as it was through this union that my father encountered the sacraments and the fullness of the faith. This is why I cannot take seriously the racial materialists who view intermarriage as a betrayal of some mythical “white race.” To the contrary, it was this very union that restored meaning and purpose to my father’s life.

My mother, by contrast, comes from a deeply rooted culture that transcends the superficial boundaries of race. The Dominican Republic, like much of Latin America, is a triracial society—a blend of Spanish, Taino, and African influences. These societies have long rejected the racial obsessions of the Anglo-American world, embracing instead a cultural identity that unites people across phenotypical differences. In the Dominican household I grew up in, skin color was irrelevant; what mattered was faith, family, and tradition.

This reality is exemplified in my family. My mother, a dark-skinned woman of Spanish-African-Taino descent, gave birth to me—a man with tawny skin and curly hair—and my brother, who has pale skin and straight hair. Despite these differences in appearance, my brother and I share the same cultural identity. We are Dominican just as much as we are Irish-Italian-Ukrainian. In societies like ours, ethnic identity transcends physical characteristics, defying the narrow racial categories imposed by the United States.