Forwarded from Military Defence Switzerland - Nederland - Suomi Telegram| Difesa Italia - Defensa España | Armées France - Militär Deutschland
How can you call it HIGH SECURITY PRISON! if in the last 4 years 4 prisoners WERE ABLE TO ESCAPE ... 🤦♂️
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1664
The best, newspaper talk about Norway prisons as perfects, when in reality ... more you search about such topic ... more 🤦♂️ you discover ...
Meanwhile seems that the escape happened in Høyt sikkerhetsnivå https://perma.cc/B56W-8LNR
and not Særlig høyt sikkerhetsnivå (= Breivik = ultra high security) https://perma.cc/NNL2-PJEB
Rate of escapes per 10,000 - Very high: Luxembourg, Finland, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, France, Lithuania, Croatia, Ireland, Germany, Montenegro, Norway, Italy, Portugal, Spain (Catalonia), Belgium, Moldova, Greece, Armenia.
Plus how the fuck is possible that a prison break is not a crime ...
ARE WE SERIOUSLY?
You can do a prison break, kill a person and being INNOCENT? Sorry, but this is 💩 with 🇨🇭 quality!
NO AND NO! This is not ok at all! This is a crime. Means such dude should get an homicide sentence + a prison break sentence + the previous sentence = this dude could remain in prison for the whole life!
Our laws really need a full revolution ... since currently they are just shit over shit AND NO ONE IS SAYING SOMETHING TO REALLY CHANGE THAT
We ask that every prisoner evading from a prison, NO MATTER WHICH COUNTRY, get additional years in prisons! near all other things that need to change.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram
Den som hjelper en innsatt til å rømme fra fengsel eller forvaringsanstalt, kan straffes med fengsel inntil tre år etter straffelovens § 161. Den innsatte selv kan straffes for rømning etter samme bestemmelse med en tilleggsstraff på inntil seks måneder
Anyone who helps an inmate to escape from prison or detention center can be punished with imprisonment of up to three years according to Section 161 of the Criminal Code. The inmate himself can be punished for escaping according to the same provision with an additional sentence of up to six months https://perma.cc/JVZ9-DSSK
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1664
The best, newspaper talk about Norway prisons as perfects, when in reality ... more you search about such topic ... more 🤦♂️ you discover ...
Meanwhile seems that the escape happened in Høyt sikkerhetsnivå https://perma.cc/B56W-8LNR
and not Særlig høyt sikkerhetsnivå (= Breivik = ultra high security) https://perma.cc/NNL2-PJEB
Rate of escapes per 10,000 - Very high: Luxembourg, Finland, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Austria, France, Lithuania, Croatia, Ireland, Germany, Montenegro, Norway, Italy, Portugal, Spain (Catalonia), Belgium, Moldova, Greece, Armenia.
Plus how the fuck is possible that a prison break is not a crime ...
ARE WE SERIOUSLY?
You can do a prison break, kill a person and being INNOCENT? Sorry, but this is 💩 with 🇨🇭 quality!
NO AND NO! This is not ok at all! This is a crime. Means such dude should get an homicide sentence + a prison break sentence + the previous sentence = this dude could remain in prison for the whole life!
Our laws really need a full revolution ... since currently they are just shit over shit AND NO ONE IS SAYING SOMETHING TO REALLY CHANGE THAT
We ask that every prisoner evading from a prison, NO MATTER WHICH COUNTRY, get additional years in prisons! near all other things that need to change.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LawsTelegram
Den som hjelper en innsatt til å rømme fra fengsel eller forvaringsanstalt, kan straffes med fengsel inntil tre år etter straffelovens § 161. Den innsatte selv kan straffes for rømning etter samme bestemmelse med en tilleggsstraff på inntil seks måneder
Anyone who helps an inmate to escape from prison or detention center can be punished with imprisonment of up to three years according to Section 161 of the Criminal Code. The inmate himself can be punished for escaping according to the same provision with an additional sentence of up to six months https://perma.cc/JVZ9-DSSK
Forwarded from Military Defence Switzerland - Nederland - Suomi Telegram| Difesa Italia - Defensa España | Armées France - Militär Deutschland
Meanwhile our dogs 🦮 have better fence!! even the anti-illegal immigration walls are better ...
Forwarded from Baja reincidencia NO es sinónimo de estadísticas reales / menos criminalidad - homicidios - abusos / más seguridad
We need to be honest: it's ridiculous to talk about recidivism, if such data is mostly fake and depends from many factors, making them looking better than what real data would be!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/822
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/841
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/391
etc.
if we know exactly that
Rape and physical violence are still hidden. Few seek medical attention, few report the case to the police, and some never tell anyone.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1648
like
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/184
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/858
and many other example (we don't remember exactly which posts contain such infos ... but we shared many examples ...)
without considering how police give simply a shit to such things! Exactly like when we reported them multiple crimes! and they simply acted "eh? it's not important! no sense you say us this ..."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1555
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/698
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/754
Plus do we need to be honest? We think it's time that even teens approving sex with an adult get sentenced too! Now it depends from the age, means obviously not for kids with 8 years for example. But is ridiculous that young under 18 (means more teen) are protected, even if they know exactly what they are doing ... Yes, sure it's an error of the adult, but even an error of the teen saying yes, but once done they complaining about it!
Again, we don't mean rape against their "no" decision.
So it's time to stop having different laws for kids or adults. Just because you kill someone with 17 years, you get a soft sentence compared to 18 years. This makes no sense!
Teen should get sentenced like adults. Obviously it depends from the situation and the age ... and related to having sex, obviously adults should get bigger sentence, compared to teen saying "yes, let we do it" but few months later "he raped me"
Exactly like people reporting fake rape should get sentenced!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1558
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/141
plus we are against shit prison sentences based on mafia!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/822
to
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/841
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PrisonFacts/391
etc.
if we know exactly that
Rape and physical violence are still hidden. Few seek medical attention, few report the case to the police, and some never tell anyone.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1648
like
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/184
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/858
and many other example (we don't remember exactly which posts contain such infos ... but we shared many examples ...)
without considering how police give simply a shit to such things! Exactly like when we reported them multiple crimes! and they simply acted "eh? it's not important! no sense you say us this ..."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1555
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/698
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/754
Plus do we need to be honest? We think it's time that even teens approving sex with an adult get sentenced too! Now it depends from the age, means obviously not for kids with 8 years for example. But is ridiculous that young under 18 (means more teen) are protected, even if they know exactly what they are doing ... Yes, sure it's an error of the adult, but even an error of the teen saying yes, but once done they complaining about it!
Again, we don't mean rape against their "no" decision.
So it's time to stop having different laws for kids or adults. Just because you kill someone with 17 years, you get a soft sentence compared to 18 years. This makes no sense!
Teen should get sentenced like adults. Obviously it depends from the situation and the age ... and related to having sex, obviously adults should get bigger sentence, compared to teen saying "yes, let we do it" but few months later "he raped me"
Exactly like people reporting fake rape should get sentenced!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1558
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/141
plus we are against shit prison sentences based on mafia!
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Related to the previous example of homicide done by Kate
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/577
Again, the story is a bit more complex, because there is no just 👨👧 but even ✈️ and 🏥
Kate, having been promised that nobody would be hurt in the robbery, intervenes by shooting Jason in the leg as well as shooting his other two accomplices https://perma.cc/AQ2Q-HBB8
When Jason wanted to kill the hostage bank manager Mr. Hutton, Kate decided to prevent it by shooting Jason in the leg. Kate's true motive was to retrieve the toy airplane, and at the end of the flashback, she left with it, leaving behind the money, as well as Jason and the other robbers https://perma.cc/QWL4-J945
and about 🏥, he was not killed by her ...
Tom was accidentally killed by a stray bullet while driving with Kate, who was fleeing the police https://perma.cc/TQ6M-F756
Before the crash, Kate had spent many years fleeing the law after killing her abusive father. To achieve her goals, she would commit several other crimes and would turn to bank robbery, assault and seduction https://perma.cc/T85N-4MAN
She was other even pretty empathic with the 🚜 ...
She then saved him by pulling him out from the burning wreckage, which allowed Mars to capture her https://perma.cc/5WBR-BNPH
Like she was pretty 🥰 otherwise ...
Just an example why considering the real story behind the homicide is HUGE IMPORTANT TO MAKE PROPER SENTENCES!
Sure, she did a crime, but there are people much worse than Kate, who really deserve a death sentence.
Kate is for sure NOT on the list of people that need a death sentence ...
Again, yes to death sentences
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RecidivismFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence
but NO to death sentences applied like shit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/622
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/483
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/478
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/504
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/511
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/321
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1300
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/577
Again, the story is a bit more complex, because there is no just 👨👧 but even ✈️ and 🏥
Kate, having been promised that nobody would be hurt in the robbery, intervenes by shooting Jason in the leg as well as shooting his other two accomplices https://perma.cc/AQ2Q-HBB8
When Jason wanted to kill the hostage bank manager Mr. Hutton, Kate decided to prevent it by shooting Jason in the leg. Kate's true motive was to retrieve the toy airplane, and at the end of the flashback, she left with it, leaving behind the money, as well as Jason and the other robbers https://perma.cc/QWL4-J945
and about 🏥, he was not killed by her ...
Tom was accidentally killed by a stray bullet while driving with Kate, who was fleeing the police https://perma.cc/TQ6M-F756
Before the crash, Kate had spent many years fleeing the law after killing her abusive father. To achieve her goals, she would commit several other crimes and would turn to bank robbery, assault and seduction https://perma.cc/T85N-4MAN
She was other even pretty empathic with the 🚜 ...
She then saved him by pulling him out from the burning wreckage, which allowed Mars to capture her https://perma.cc/5WBR-BNPH
Like she was pretty 🥰 otherwise ...
Just an example why considering the real story behind the homicide is HUGE IMPORTANT TO MAKE PROPER SENTENCES!
Sure, she did a crime, but there are people much worse than Kate, who really deserve a death sentence.
Kate is for sure NOT on the list of people that need a death sentence ...
Again, yes to death sentences
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RecidivismFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikDeathSentence
but NO to death sentences applied like shit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/622
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/483
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/478
https://news.1rj.ru/str/WomenRightsTelegram/504
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/511
https://news.1rj.ru/str/AmnestyBullshit/321
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RapeTelegram/1300
Behind "we need to keep him in prison" Part 1
Så skal vi huske at motparten, statens advokater, mener Breivik lyver om selvmordstankene. De mener også at terroristen har en ekstrem evne til å tilpasse seg ulike situasjoner, og stempler ham som beregnende. Dessuten kan det fort bli et prosedyrepoeng for regjeringsadvokatens folk at hevn ikke er en del av straffegjennomføringen her i landet.
Then we must remember that the other party, the state's lawyers, believe Breivik is lying about his suicidal thoughts. They also believe that the terrorist has an extreme ability to adapt to different situations, and label him as calculating. Moreover, it can quickly become a procedural point for the government attorney's people that revenge is not part of the execution of sentences in this country.
THE REALITY? ALMOST EVERYONE IS DOING THAT!
The best? People are so idiots believing such shit ... exactly like employers believe the bullshit people say during the job interview just to look better, or the bullshit politicians or celebrities are saying.
So now the real question is "why you have the right to believe this is fake with Breivik, while you believe every shit with other prisoners or things?"
Who give you the right to say "yes, he is saying the true, let we release the prisoner" or "no, he is saying bullshit, let we keep the prisoner in prison".
Based on what? Based on bullshit psychologists are saying, that are the first people in the world NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND what is going on ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/3
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/5
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/183
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikBullshit/54
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CannibalTelegram/32
Again, saying "i'm fine" is not synonym of being fine!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/17
See next post
Så skal vi huske at motparten, statens advokater, mener Breivik lyver om selvmordstankene. De mener også at terroristen har en ekstrem evne til å tilpasse seg ulike situasjoner, og stempler ham som beregnende. Dessuten kan det fort bli et prosedyrepoeng for regjeringsadvokatens folk at hevn ikke er en del av straffegjennomføringen her i landet.
Then we must remember that the other party, the state's lawyers, believe Breivik is lying about his suicidal thoughts. They also believe that the terrorist has an extreme ability to adapt to different situations, and label him as calculating. Moreover, it can quickly become a procedural point for the government attorney's people that revenge is not part of the execution of sentences in this country.
THE REALITY? ALMOST EVERYONE IS DOING THAT!
The best? People are so idiots believing such shit ... exactly like employers believe the bullshit people say during the job interview just to look better, or the bullshit politicians or celebrities are saying.
So now the real question is "why you have the right to believe this is fake with Breivik, while you believe every shit with other prisoners or things?"
Who give you the right to say "yes, he is saying the true, let we release the prisoner" or "no, he is saying bullshit, let we keep the prisoner in prison".
Based on what? Based on bullshit psychologists are saying, that are the first people in the world NOT ABLE TO UNDERSTAND what is going on ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/3
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/5
https://news.1rj.ru/str/HumanRightsChecklist/183
https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikBullshit/54
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CannibalTelegram/32
Again, saying "i'm fine" is not synonym of being fine!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/17
See next post
Behind "we need to keep him in prison" Part 2
Again, saying "i'm fine" is not synonym of being fine!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/17
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/85
So the question again: where is the difference between keeping prisoners in prison for life based on "your believes" and deciding if people need to get a death sentence or not?
In the first case, it's based on OPINIONS! ... because you will NEVER know what the dude is thinking
In the second case, it's based on FACTS and PROOFS! Means he gets a death sentence, because of the amount of crimes he did and because he trashed all his human rights by doing such crimes! so it's not an opinion if such criminal deserve or not a death sentence!
Again, we talk about serious crime, not @ShittyDeathSentences! with proofs and done with proper @DeathExecutionMethod! not based on discrimination and personal wishes / interests!
Third point: do you think that living 80 years in prison is really better for criminals than knowing "well, finally i die"? (this especially if there is no @LuxusHotel). Exactly like keeping alive people against their wishes ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PoliticsTelegram/121
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuthanasiaTelegram/230
So again, not only because "you are against death" means everyone need to be against death ... otherwise is like dietitian, that because they hate to eat food xx, patients don't get food xxx (A REAL STORY WE SAW!). This make no sense at all! Your personal wishes or opinions DON'T NEED TO BE PART OF SUCH DECISIONS!
Just facts and science!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceBullshit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceNOW
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TraumaTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RecidivismFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DahmerDeathSentence
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SerialKillerDeathSentence
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SerialKillerExhibition
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathExecutionMethod
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SuicideRape
considering BOTH HUMAN RIGHTS! = criminals and population!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
Again, saying "i'm fine" is not synonym of being fine!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/15
https://news.1rj.ru/str/NotTodayTelegram/17
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/BreivikParole/85
So the question again: where is the difference between keeping prisoners in prison for life based on "your believes" and deciding if people need to get a death sentence or not?
In the first case, it's based on OPINIONS! ... because you will NEVER know what the dude is thinking
In the second case, it's based on FACTS and PROOFS! Means he gets a death sentence, because of the amount of crimes he did and because he trashed all his human rights by doing such crimes! so it's not an opinion if such criminal deserve or not a death sentence!
Again, we talk about serious crime, not @ShittyDeathSentences! with proofs and done with proper @DeathExecutionMethod! not based on discrimination and personal wishes / interests!
Third point: do you think that living 80 years in prison is really better for criminals than knowing "well, finally i die"? (this especially if there is no @LuxusHotel). Exactly like keeping alive people against their wishes ...
https://news.1rj.ru/str/PoliticsTelegram/121
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EuthanasiaTelegram/230
So again, not only because "you are against death" means everyone need to be against death ... otherwise is like dietitian, that because they hate to eat food xx, patients don't get food xxx (A REAL STORY WE SAW!). This make no sense at all! Your personal wishes or opinions DON'T NEED TO BE PART OF SUCH DECISIONS!
Just facts and science!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceBullshit
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathSentenceNOW
https://news.1rj.ru/str/TraumaTelegram
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RecidivismFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ParoleFacts
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DahmerDeathSentence
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SerialKillerDeathSentence
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SerialKillerExhibition
https://news.1rj.ru/str/ShittyDeathSentences
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DeathExecutionMethod
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SuicideRape
considering BOTH HUMAN RIGHTS! = criminals and population!
https://news.1rj.ru/str/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
The recidivism rate of life prisoners is lower than the average of all prison inmates.
Since 1980, a total of 73 life prisoners have been released, and 16 of them have returned to prison by the end of 2009. The renewal rate is 21.9%.
First THIS DOESN'T MEAN NOTHING!
16 people can returned by killing 3000 people or by killing 0 people ...
A new homicide was committed by four people
Second: those who are still doing crimes without getting in prison?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RecidivismFacts/166
Even related to homicides
Det er 29 drap i Norge politiet ikke har klart å oppklare. Så lenge en drapsmann går løs får ikke de pårørende ro.
There are 29 murders in Norway that the police have not been able to solve. As long as a murderer is on the loose, the next of kin will not rest https://perma.cc/BT45-VRCT
Third, most important: WHAT WAS THE REASON FOR THIS LIFE SENTENCE?! means bullshit or something seriously?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CrimeExamples/11
which type of homicide?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/238
Vuosina 1970 - 2011 Suomessa ei ole määrätty elinkautista vankeutta muista kuin murhista.
In the years 1970 - 2011, life imprisonment has not been imposed in Finland for crimes other than murder.
The recidivism rate for prison inmates during the five- year follow-up period was 54.7% in 2012. Life prisoners seem to commit crimes related to life and health. More than 60% repeat their crime less than a year after being released.
In Finland, life imprisonment has never meant a sentence that continues throughout life, i.e. until the convicted person dies. Under the Penal Code of 1889, life imprisonment lasted 12 years, and the subsequent parole lasted the rest of life.
Since 1980, a total of 73 life prisoners have been released, and 16 of them have returned to prison by the end of 2009. The renewal rate is 21.9%.
First THIS DOESN'T MEAN NOTHING!
16 people can returned by killing 3000 people or by killing 0 people ...
A new homicide was committed by four people
Second: those who are still doing crimes without getting in prison?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/RecidivismFacts/166
Even related to homicides
Det er 29 drap i Norge politiet ikke har klart å oppklare. Så lenge en drapsmann går løs får ikke de pårørende ro.
There are 29 murders in Norway that the police have not been able to solve. As long as a murderer is on the loose, the next of kin will not rest https://perma.cc/BT45-VRCT
Third, most important: WHAT WAS THE REASON FOR THIS LIFE SENTENCE?! means bullshit or something seriously?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/CrimeExamples/11
which type of homicide?
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/238
Vuosina 1970 - 2011 Suomessa ei ole määrätty elinkautista vankeutta muista kuin murhista.
In the years 1970 - 2011, life imprisonment has not been imposed in Finland for crimes other than murder.
The recidivism rate for prison inmates during the five- year follow-up period was 54.7% in 2012. Life prisoners seem to commit crimes related to life and health. More than 60% repeat their crime less than a year after being released.
In Finland, life imprisonment has never meant a sentence that continues throughout life, i.e. until the convicted person dies. Under the Penal Code of 1889, life imprisonment lasted 12 years, and the subsequent parole lasted the rest of life.
Behind recidivism Part 2
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/870
In prisoners released in the late 1980s, the average length was 11 years. Over the next decade, lifers were released on average after 10.4 years.
Since then, the length of life imprisonment has increased so that the prison term usually lasted just over 13 years in the 2000s.
The average length of life imprisonment for those convicted of murder before the age of 21 has been 12 years 11 months.
The number of life prisoners has increased ninefold from 1970 to the beginning of 2014 (Suomi)
The number of life prisoners has also increased in Sweden. In the 1980s began his sentence 7 of life sentences, in the 1990s 67 and from 2000 to 2005 a total of 72 life sentences.
Between 1995 and 2003, a total of 21 life prisoners have been pardoned. Recidivism is therefore about 27%.
Of the 56 life prisoners released, 32 people, or 57%, had committed one murder
in addition to either multiple murders, killings or their attempts, robberies or their attempts or to various degrees of abuse. 8 out of 56 released from life sentences: more murders
Conclusion? Stats are saying anything about the reason, which crime, if the sentence has been made with brain, did they redo crime, without that the government know that? - plus such stats are saying nothing about rape or suicides ...
Rape, a much worst crime than "just killing people ..."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/238
Part 1 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DefenceTelegram/870
In prisoners released in the late 1980s, the average length was 11 years. Over the next decade, lifers were released on average after 10.4 years.
Since then, the length of life imprisonment has increased so that the prison term usually lasted just over 13 years in the 2000s.
The average length of life imprisonment for those convicted of murder before the age of 21 has been 12 years 11 months.
The number of life prisoners has increased ninefold from 1970 to the beginning of 2014 (Suomi)
The number of life prisoners has also increased in Sweden. In the 1980s began his sentence 7 of life sentences, in the 1990s 67 and from 2000 to 2005 a total of 72 life sentences.
Between 1995 and 2003, a total of 21 life prisoners have been pardoned. Recidivism is therefore about 27%.
Of the 56 life prisoners released, 32 people, or 57%, had committed one murder
in addition to either multiple murders, killings or their attempts, robberies or their attempts or to various degrees of abuse. 8 out of 56 released from life sentences: more murders
Conclusion? Stats are saying anything about the reason, which crime, if the sentence has been made with brain, did they redo crime, without that the government know that? - plus such stats are saying nothing about rape or suicides ...
Rape, a much worst crime than "just killing people ..."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/IsraeliFacts/238