Something worth noting, however: The court has formally stated that decisions made under the previous interpretation of the Chevron understanding will stand, on the basis of stare decisis.
This, however, is also the court where multiple members said in their hearings that they wouldn't touch Roe
Forwarded from The Northstar✨ System 칠성들 AKA Ky
I'd like to make sure we argue on the facts here. This decision still allows these laws to have gaps just like any other.
This just puts these laws on equal footing with most other laws by shifting the interpretation of the gaps in those laws from agencies like the EPA, to courts and judges and Case Law.
Honestly surprised this took this long (neg). I figured the Supreme Court would always have a bias towards courts interpreting legal gaps, and away from experts & agencies doing so.
Yeah it sucks hard but at least it's not just saying "if there's a gap in the law then you can do whatever you want in there and nobody will stop you"
This just puts these laws on equal footing with most other laws by shifting the interpretation of the gaps in those laws from agencies like the EPA, to courts and judges and Case Law.
Honestly surprised this took this long (neg). I figured the Supreme Court would always have a bias towards courts interpreting legal gaps, and away from experts & agencies doing so.
Yeah it sucks hard but at least it's not just saying "if there's a gap in the law then you can do whatever you want in there and nobody will stop you"
👏1