Bill: But I own several vaccine companies, so I'm obviously qualified and technically I've been practicing medicine without a licence for decades and no one's ever complained?
Me: That's because they're all dead Bill, so they can't complain!! Anyway...
No... You're not a doctor Bill!
Bill: Yes I a...
[suddenly they're all thrust into absolute blackness]
Hey why'd the lights turn off and leave us in pitch blackness?
[faint, pretty livid whispering]
Bill: Wha... What do you mean its a Soprano style ending, where it cuts to black midsentence?
[faint, yet furious whispering]
Bill: Ooooooh! Ha! Yeah, it is kinda hard conveying that in the form of text and is made doubly so, when someone who just can't get the concept, keeps yapping on and on...
Oh shit! That's me isn't it? OK... I'll sut up n...
(To be continued in part 2, if you can still be bothered and the writer can remember that he is supposed to be writing a part 2?
Anyway...)
Me: That's because they're all dead Bill, so they can't complain!! Anyway...
No... You're not a doctor Bill!
Bill: Yes I a...
[suddenly they're all thrust into absolute blackness]
Hey why'd the lights turn off and leave us in pitch blackness?
[faint, pretty livid whispering]
Bill: Wha... What do you mean its a Soprano style ending, where it cuts to black midsentence?
[faint, yet furious whispering]
Bill: Ooooooh! Ha! Yeah, it is kinda hard conveying that in the form of text and is made doubly so, when someone who just can't get the concept, keeps yapping on and on...
Oh shit! That's me isn't it? OK... I'll sut up n...
(To be continued in part 2, if you can still be bothered and the writer can remember that he is supposed to be writing a part 2?
Anyway...)
❤1
Problems in our midst, that must be overcome, if we are ever to succeed?
These 2 posts, are in response to this one, that was on the M Seeker of Truth Chat page.
(The person who posted it, will remain anonymous until they claim their work)
I'm forwarding my response, as I feel what I've said here will resonate with most of you and might cause some pause for thought, in others:
This is the original post:
Generally, it seems the establishment's psyop/misinfo/misdirection campaign operates at a *massive* scale, and is often designed to divide, between truthers, and between truthers and normies.....
I'm still not completely sure whether the "virology debunk" is correct or a potential psyop itself. It may well be correct, and probably is, but again, I'd probably need to sit down and weigh all the arguments/counter arguments for several weeks before feeling confident of my opinion, and even then, how will I be sure unless I have my own lab equipment? I suppose it would help if I personally knew a virologist well, and knew I could trust them, and they confirmed it was a load of BS.
But assuming the virology debunk is correct, which it may well be, it may still be unwise to try to "sell" that to normies, or even to other truthers, since it may lead to division that may not be helpful currently...
What we *do* know for sure is that the establishment are self serving, are operating a ton of psyops and controlled opposition, for their own agendas, and that money and corruption are running mainstream science and medicine. For now, I think that's enough common ground to focus on and widely expose....
I appreciate that people who *have* sat down and studied the virology topic sufficiently may have greater confidence in their position, but are they sure they've put enough in depth weighing up into it, attempting to give the counter arguments an equal "chance" as well? If they have then fair enough, however, how many people in the truth movement have time to go through that weighing up process?
One thing that concerns me is that all the high profile "anti virology" crowd have red flags and are potentially controlled opposition themselves, making me more suspicious of the "virology debunk" being a possible psyop. However, I may be wrong about that... I still think, however, that the point above about not making it a focal point may be wise, to avoid unnecessary division, from a "tactical"/"strategic" view...
My viewpoint would be that later, after the dust settles, better science can be undertaken on a wider scale, to arrive at more "definitive" answers to these things....
These 2 posts, are in response to this one, that was on the M Seeker of Truth Chat page.
(The person who posted it, will remain anonymous until they claim their work)
I'm forwarding my response, as I feel what I've said here will resonate with most of you and might cause some pause for thought, in others:
This is the original post:
Generally, it seems the establishment's psyop/misinfo/misdirection campaign operates at a *massive* scale, and is often designed to divide, between truthers, and between truthers and normies.....
I'm still not completely sure whether the "virology debunk" is correct or a potential psyop itself. It may well be correct, and probably is, but again, I'd probably need to sit down and weigh all the arguments/counter arguments for several weeks before feeling confident of my opinion, and even then, how will I be sure unless I have my own lab equipment? I suppose it would help if I personally knew a virologist well, and knew I could trust them, and they confirmed it was a load of BS.
But assuming the virology debunk is correct, which it may well be, it may still be unwise to try to "sell" that to normies, or even to other truthers, since it may lead to division that may not be helpful currently...
What we *do* know for sure is that the establishment are self serving, are operating a ton of psyops and controlled opposition, for their own agendas, and that money and corruption are running mainstream science and medicine. For now, I think that's enough common ground to focus on and widely expose....
I appreciate that people who *have* sat down and studied the virology topic sufficiently may have greater confidence in their position, but are they sure they've put enough in depth weighing up into it, attempting to give the counter arguments an equal "chance" as well? If they have then fair enough, however, how many people in the truth movement have time to go through that weighing up process?
One thing that concerns me is that all the high profile "anti virology" crowd have red flags and are potentially controlled opposition themselves, making me more suspicious of the "virology debunk" being a possible psyop. However, I may be wrong about that... I still think, however, that the point above about not making it a focal point may be wise, to avoid unnecessary division, from a "tactical"/"strategic" view...
My viewpoint would be that later, after the dust settles, better science can be undertaken on a wider scale, to arrive at more "definitive" answers to these things....
👍1
Forwarded from sam fisher™
You know what you're missing from that and could probably do with being in it.
The rest btw, is very good, quite measured and emphasises the need for common ground, irrespective of ones particular Ideological viewpoint.
Anyway... What's missing is the nature of how the control of the narrative is achieved?
There is a distinct difference, that I'm sure you're aware of (I think I've mentioned it once or twice? lol I've also heard you state something along these lines too...)
When controlling any narrative based information and do it effectively, it actually takes very little effort on behalf of the person who is instigating that control.
Most people assume that you need grand lies, complicated branching lines and masses of detail, to make a person steer away from a subject that you would prefer they didn't look at?
However, that is counter productive and the bigger, more detailed and fabricated your counter narrative, the more impossible that counter narrative becomes to maintain and manage. It will very quickly and inevitably collapse.
This is why conmen (or rather, the crap ones, ie: Humpty and the Catman) end up being outed, because they can't keep up with their own narrative.
How the system does it and why it's remained relatively unscathed for so long, is the fact that like I've said countless times, it's my favourite equation:
95% truth and 10% lies
You use a very large portion of the truth, that you're trying to cover up and then alter tiny, yet critically important details here and there. A date perhaps, just doing that can send someone off in a vastly different direction, that they may never be able to trace back to where they went wrong? Same with just simply altering the spelling of the name of a person, or location, particularly if the source is considered to be credible, as that can have the same effect too.
You see, the reason why it works so effectively, is because it's us that does the majority of the work for them?
It's ourselves that causes a sort of cascade effect, that stems from that tiny alteration, as the information we gather from that point on will not only be wrong, be entirely no others fault but our own. We are, as a community, in the most part and irrespective of how long we've done this for, still very naive and too egotistical also. We're naive, because we never consider that this metaphorically microscopic game, is the real point of entry for where the System's attacks are made? We neither expect them to do something so simplistic, nor be able to see where they've hoodwinked you as a result?
I say egotistical, because we all are in this game. Not a single person, who researches to the levels most of us do, wouldn't mind the recognition garnered by a new and significant discovery? So these alterations initially, stroke our egos,
"Oh you clever boy / girl / squirrel (squirrels rule the world from behind the scenes... One day, you'll all see I was right dammit!) you found that crucial puzzle piece, didn't you?
Go on, try the rest of your pieces, go on!
Oh look, there's one that's a perfect fit. There's another and another and another, oh my they're all slotting into place, you really are that much of a genius that you'll be king of mensa for sure (incidentally, member of mensa here... It's not all that it's cracked up to be!) keep going, there's so many pieces slotting in perfectly... Well, maybe not that one there perhaps, you've kind of forced that one in. The rest though after it, perfect again, so I'm sure it's just been bent out of shape a bit, from over use, it'll be fine, you're making such impressive gains here that you... Oh! Oh no... Another bent piece, but the others fit still sooooo... "
It's those little niggles, that trigger something else we all share and it's something we all have to learn and then relearn, again and again and again and that's we allow our pride to dictate what we see and what we don't, for the sake of maintaining our newly crafted narrative.
The rest btw, is very good, quite measured and emphasises the need for common ground, irrespective of ones particular Ideological viewpoint.
Anyway... What's missing is the nature of how the control of the narrative is achieved?
There is a distinct difference, that I'm sure you're aware of (I think I've mentioned it once or twice? lol I've also heard you state something along these lines too...)
When controlling any narrative based information and do it effectively, it actually takes very little effort on behalf of the person who is instigating that control.
Most people assume that you need grand lies, complicated branching lines and masses of detail, to make a person steer away from a subject that you would prefer they didn't look at?
However, that is counter productive and the bigger, more detailed and fabricated your counter narrative, the more impossible that counter narrative becomes to maintain and manage. It will very quickly and inevitably collapse.
This is why conmen (or rather, the crap ones, ie: Humpty and the Catman) end up being outed, because they can't keep up with their own narrative.
How the system does it and why it's remained relatively unscathed for so long, is the fact that like I've said countless times, it's my favourite equation:
95% truth and 10% lies
You use a very large portion of the truth, that you're trying to cover up and then alter tiny, yet critically important details here and there. A date perhaps, just doing that can send someone off in a vastly different direction, that they may never be able to trace back to where they went wrong? Same with just simply altering the spelling of the name of a person, or location, particularly if the source is considered to be credible, as that can have the same effect too.
You see, the reason why it works so effectively, is because it's us that does the majority of the work for them?
It's ourselves that causes a sort of cascade effect, that stems from that tiny alteration, as the information we gather from that point on will not only be wrong, be entirely no others fault but our own. We are, as a community, in the most part and irrespective of how long we've done this for, still very naive and too egotistical also. We're naive, because we never consider that this metaphorically microscopic game, is the real point of entry for where the System's attacks are made? We neither expect them to do something so simplistic, nor be able to see where they've hoodwinked you as a result?
I say egotistical, because we all are in this game. Not a single person, who researches to the levels most of us do, wouldn't mind the recognition garnered by a new and significant discovery? So these alterations initially, stroke our egos,
"Oh you clever boy / girl / squirrel (squirrels rule the world from behind the scenes... One day, you'll all see I was right dammit!) you found that crucial puzzle piece, didn't you?
Go on, try the rest of your pieces, go on!
Oh look, there's one that's a perfect fit. There's another and another and another, oh my they're all slotting into place, you really are that much of a genius that you'll be king of mensa for sure (incidentally, member of mensa here... It's not all that it's cracked up to be!) keep going, there's so many pieces slotting in perfectly... Well, maybe not that one there perhaps, you've kind of forced that one in. The rest though after it, perfect again, so I'm sure it's just been bent out of shape a bit, from over use, it'll be fine, you're making such impressive gains here that you... Oh! Oh no... Another bent piece, but the others fit still sooooo... "
It's those little niggles, that trigger something else we all share and it's something we all have to learn and then relearn, again and again and again and that's we allow our pride to dictate what we see and what we don't, for the sake of maintaining our newly crafted narrative.
Forwarded from sam fisher™
After all, the rest checks out, so what if those bits don't quite fit, no one will notice, because of the rest. It's at this point, you will always double down and ignore those bent corners.
It's this pridefulness, that prevents us from acknowledging our mistake, for the sake of being right and the accolades that brings. Which permeates out into those who've followed us, or use our research further down the line, believing us to be a credible and reliable source to use.
Which is when your research becomes dogma, in the eyes of many, that that can no longer be challenged (after all, so many believe and have used it now, often as the basis for their own research, their own beliefs and it's at this point, that the System's job is done.
It's why people will still cling to outmoded and outdated ideas, that are at some point easily debunked. More often than not, by that very same changed date, name etc.
I realise that's a bit long, guess I needed to vent?
I'm tired of this infighting and having to battle with people, that really should know better and yet can't, or more accurately won't see, nor accept what's laid out in front of them, that SHOULD be that point of epiphany and yet always seems to end up with me becoming the devil in their eyes somehow?
I'm tired of being the devil all the time, those horns hurt your head after a while and have you ever tried wearing goat hair trousers, for any length of time?
It's not fun!
Right...
Back to your post...
I completely agree...
We need to heal that divide, or at the very least, set those divisions to one side and focus on the one thing that broadly generates a sense of unity, between all sides.
That being the vaccine.
It's this pridefulness, that prevents us from acknowledging our mistake, for the sake of being right and the accolades that brings. Which permeates out into those who've followed us, or use our research further down the line, believing us to be a credible and reliable source to use.
Which is when your research becomes dogma, in the eyes of many, that that can no longer be challenged (after all, so many believe and have used it now, often as the basis for their own research, their own beliefs and it's at this point, that the System's job is done.
It's why people will still cling to outmoded and outdated ideas, that are at some point easily debunked. More often than not, by that very same changed date, name etc.
I realise that's a bit long, guess I needed to vent?
I'm tired of this infighting and having to battle with people, that really should know better and yet can't, or more accurately won't see, nor accept what's laid out in front of them, that SHOULD be that point of epiphany and yet always seems to end up with me becoming the devil in their eyes somehow?
I'm tired of being the devil all the time, those horns hurt your head after a while and have you ever tried wearing goat hair trousers, for any length of time?
It's not fun!
Right...
Back to your post...
I completely agree...
We need to heal that divide, or at the very least, set those divisions to one side and focus on the one thing that broadly generates a sense of unity, between all sides.
That being the vaccine.
👏1
ミ 𝘙𝘦𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘮𝘰𝘮 彡
😂
It doesn't take a rocket scientist does it?
A kid with a catapult could take care of it
A kid with a catapult could take care of it
New Researchers have entered The Arena.
Please join me in welcoming 2 new researchers to the drops page:
The first, I actually signed up a few days ago and completely forgot about letting you guys know? 🤦♂️
Johnny Dank
I think his musical talents will not only liven the place up a bit more, he likes to throw facts into his rhymes so we get the best of both worlds
D
Is the 2nd new researcher, who is also a fellow writer, so we may get some more, interesting and long form posts going on the page (something I've been neglecting lately... So she may kick me into doing my own again too) she's been researching nonionising radiation for quite some time and also the destruction of cultures too.
I'm looking forward to looking through their posts.
Welcome to the team guys
😁👍
Please join me in welcoming 2 new researchers to the drops page:
The first, I actually signed up a few days ago and completely forgot about letting you guys know? 🤦♂️
Johnny Dank
I think his musical talents will not only liven the place up a bit more, he likes to throw facts into his rhymes so we get the best of both worlds
D
Is the 2nd new researcher, who is also a fellow writer, so we may get some more, interesting and long form posts going on the page (something I've been neglecting lately... So she may kick me into doing my own again too) she's been researching nonionising radiation for quite some time and also the destruction of cultures too.
I'm looking forward to looking through their posts.
Welcome to the team guys
😁👍
👍2
Ministry-of-Truth-Big-Brother-Watch-290123.pdf
7.3 MB
Ministry of Truth - Big Brother watch paper
Everything you need to know about the 77th brigade, but were too afraid to ask?
Everything you need to know about the 77th brigade, but were too afraid to ask?
👍1
Did you know?
The only political campaign Ghislaine Maxwell has ever donated to was for Andrew Cuomo in 2002?
Did you know she also attended his wedding to Kerry Kennedy?
The only political campaign Ghislaine Maxwell has ever donated to was for Andrew Cuomo in 2002?
Did you know she also attended his wedding to Kerry Kennedy?
🔥1
Nephilim: Fallen Angels, Giants or Men? - Parshah Focus - Parshah
https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/1987422/jewish/Nephilim-Fallen-Angels-Giants-or-Men.htm
https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/1987422/jewish/Nephilim-Fallen-Angels-Giants-or-Men.htm
Chabad.org
Nephilim: Fallen Angels, Giants or Men?
Just before the story of Noah’s ark, the Torah presents a cryptic narrative that has mystified and intrigued scholars for generations:
👍1