Forwarded from Red Ice TV (app banned)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
E Palestine, Ohio was part of a pilot program called MyID (a Digital ID with embedded health status) to track and trace all citizens’ medical data. Just another coincidence.
Forwarded from Memory Of Honor
"Instigated by such suggestions, they unanimously rose in arms, led by Boadicea, a woman of royal descent - FOR THEY MAKE NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE SEXES IN SUCCESSION TO THE THRONE - and attacking the soldiers dispersed through the garrisons, stormed the fortified posts, and invaded the colony itself, the seat of slavery."
— Tacitus
— Tacitus
👍1
Forwarded from 🌙Reviver Of Blood Memory
❤1
Forwarded from 🌙Reviver Of Blood Memory
Forwarded from 🌙Reviver Of Blood Memory
Forwarded from 🌙Reviver Of Blood Memory
They inject us with mercury
in vacc!nes when we are children, and they also fill our mouths with it. Homosexual population explosion is happening on purpose, by design👇🏻
http://www.renegadetribune.com/mercury-makes-male-birds-homosexual-what-about-humans/
in vacc!nes when we are children, and they also fill our mouths with it. Homosexual population explosion is happening on purpose, by design👇🏻
http://www.renegadetribune.com/mercury-makes-male-birds-homosexual-what-about-humans/
👍3
Forwarded from The Forbidden Bookclub
What_do_two_men_kissing_and_a_bucket_of_maggots_have_in_common_2017.pdf
1.7 MB
What do two men kissing and a bucket of maggots have in common? Heterosexual men’s indistinguishable salivary α-amylase responses to photos of two men kissing and disgusting images
The current study sought to examine how Utah men’s physiological reactions to viewing same-sex public displays of affection (PDA), measured through salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), differ as a function of sexual prejudice, as assessed using the Attitudes Towards Lesbians and Gay Men Scale (ATLG) and the Modern Homonegativity Scale.
The results of the current study suggest that all individuals, not just highly sexually prejudiced individuals, may experience a physiological response indicative of stress when witnessing a male same-sex couple kissing. (O'Handley et al., 2017)
#psychology #lgbt #biology #study
The current study sought to examine how Utah men’s physiological reactions to viewing same-sex public displays of affection (PDA), measured through salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), differ as a function of sexual prejudice, as assessed using the Attitudes Towards Lesbians and Gay Men Scale (ATLG) and the Modern Homonegativity Scale.
The results of the current study suggest that all individuals, not just highly sexually prejudiced individuals, may experience a physiological response indicative of stress when witnessing a male same-sex couple kissing. (O'Handley et al., 2017)
#psychology #lgbt #biology #study
Forwarded from The Barbarian Clergyman
"Pride" as a Weapon
Despite their core ideological differences, Liberals, Progressives, and Conservatives all typically admit the following statement:
"Whatever consenting people do in the privacy of their own homes behind closed doors is none of anybody else's business."
This sounds reasonable, yes? Sure.
But I bet most of these people do not understand why this absolutely is other people's concern. Moreover, they likely have never familarized themselves with why that statement was intended to come out of their mouths.
Hard Conservatives tend to get it right about the fact that LGBT rights was "never about rights at all". But it gets even darker, and a form of social accelerationism quickly appears clear. [Here are a few examples.]
In 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention adopted its Gay Rights Platform. In the STATE LEVEL section, Clause 7 calls for, per verbatim, "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent." (Almost always, the implication aims to lower the age, toward a more midpubescent to prepubescent range.)
In 1987, Guide Magazine featured the article, The Overhauling of Straight America. Its writers, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen (who are Jewish), elaborate a prolonged guided outline on normalizing homosexuality to the point of irrealism. In Point 2, noscriptd, Portray Gays As Victims, Not As Aggressive Challengers, it begins by stating, "In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector." (This is an active tactic employed by LGBT ideology today, especially targeted to young children and babies.)
In the same year, an author named Michael Swift wrote a "satirical" article noscriptd, The Gay Revolutionary, which entered The Congressional Record of the United States Congress. Its disclaimer tries to shield its content from future scrutiny by everyone else, declaring, "This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor." However, what comes next drops the jaw pointblank: "We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us." (This reveals a nightmarish scenario where tyranny of the minority actualizes, and an insane, unnatural, anti-heterosexual regime is put into practice, where women are lesbianized against their will and the punishment for normal relationships is deportation. Realizing that our societies almost 30 years later now discourages us from procreation and flaunts Pride Parades every year, we must ask: is it truly satirical?)
It began with "tolerance of a harmless minority", then mutated into mandated same-sex marriage, and after that escalated to questioning the biological reality of a minor's ability to consent to sex, kept going further with an entire acronym slapped on with rainbow colors and clownish makeup, and then has grown coalescent with an open endearment for homosexuals to dress up as their opposite of their own sex and be rewarded for the delusion of calling themselves "Ze".
The results speak for themselves.
Despite their core ideological differences, Liberals, Progressives, and Conservatives all typically admit the following statement:
"Whatever consenting people do in the privacy of their own homes behind closed doors is none of anybody else's business."
This sounds reasonable, yes? Sure.
But I bet most of these people do not understand why this absolutely is other people's concern. Moreover, they likely have never familarized themselves with why that statement was intended to come out of their mouths.
Hard Conservatives tend to get it right about the fact that LGBT rights was "never about rights at all". But it gets even darker, and a form of social accelerationism quickly appears clear. [Here are a few examples.]
In 1972, the National Coalition of Gay Organizations Convention adopted its Gay Rights Platform. In the STATE LEVEL section, Clause 7 calls for, per verbatim, "Repeal of all laws governing the age of sexual consent." (Almost always, the implication aims to lower the age, toward a more midpubescent to prepubescent range.)
In 1987, Guide Magazine featured the article, The Overhauling of Straight America. Its writers, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen (who are Jewish), elaborate a prolonged guided outline on normalizing homosexuality to the point of irrealism. In Point 2, noscriptd, Portray Gays As Victims, Not As Aggressive Challengers, it begins by stating, "In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector." (This is an active tactic employed by LGBT ideology today, especially targeted to young children and babies.)
In the same year, an author named Michael Swift wrote a "satirical" article noscriptd, The Gay Revolutionary, which entered The Congressional Record of the United States Congress. Its disclaimer tries to shield its content from future scrutiny by everyone else, declaring, "This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor." However, what comes next drops the jaw pointblank: "We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us." (This reveals a nightmarish scenario where tyranny of the minority actualizes, and an insane, unnatural, anti-heterosexual regime is put into practice, where women are lesbianized against their will and the punishment for normal relationships is deportation. Realizing that our societies almost 30 years later now discourages us from procreation and flaunts Pride Parades every year, we must ask: is it truly satirical?)
It began with "tolerance of a harmless minority", then mutated into mandated same-sex marriage, and after that escalated to questioning the biological reality of a minor's ability to consent to sex, kept going further with an entire acronym slapped on with rainbow colors and clownish makeup, and then has grown coalescent with an open endearment for homosexuals to dress up as their opposite of their own sex and be rewarded for the delusion of calling themselves "Ze".
The results speak for themselves.
👍1
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443v1.full.pdf Shedding is real. As Igor says..... Let me try to explain it. First, these scientists from the University of Colorado looked at face masks, worn by vaccinated health care workers. They found that those workers shed antibodies generated by vaccination, and some antibodies got trapped in the masks and could be detected. This means that vaccinated people are literally “shedding” vaccine-caused antibodies.
Interested in that, scientists looked further: they compared unvaccinated children living with unvaccinated parents, to similarly unvaccinated children, but living with vaccinated parents.
It turned out that vaxxed parents actively shed vaccine-produced particles onto their children so that the kids acquired “humoral immunity” following shedding from their parents! Not only was this finding evident in the data, it actually was STRONGLY statistically significant with p-value of 0.01! This means that this was not a chance finding.
It remains to be explained WHY children have intranasal IgG. The authors seem to think that it is because of antibody shedding via droplets. In other words, they seem to propose that what is transferred is IgG itself in saliva droplets. They may be right. That said, there is a possibility that children DEVELOP intranasal IgG because other vaccine byproducts or exosomes are being shed.
It could even be due to lipid mRNA nanoparticles themselves shed and being transferred via saliva, like a virus. In fact, considering two replies to this article that I quoted at the bottom, mRNA lipid nanoparticle shedding is most likely. Why? Because the responders report experiencing STRONG IMMUNE REACTIONS.
Such byproducts would be CAUSING intranasal IgG in children as an immune reaction in children, rather than those IgGs being essentially mechanically spat from parents onto their children.
The article, while very interesting, is only the first step in researching vaccine shedding and I hope that further light will be shed (pun intended) on this phenomenon!
Interested in that, scientists looked further: they compared unvaccinated children living with unvaccinated parents, to similarly unvaccinated children, but living with vaccinated parents.
It turned out that vaxxed parents actively shed vaccine-produced particles onto their children so that the kids acquired “humoral immunity” following shedding from their parents! Not only was this finding evident in the data, it actually was STRONGLY statistically significant with p-value of 0.01! This means that this was not a chance finding.
It remains to be explained WHY children have intranasal IgG. The authors seem to think that it is because of antibody shedding via droplets. In other words, they seem to propose that what is transferred is IgG itself in saliva droplets. They may be right. That said, there is a possibility that children DEVELOP intranasal IgG because other vaccine byproducts or exosomes are being shed.
It could even be due to lipid mRNA nanoparticles themselves shed and being transferred via saliva, like a virus. In fact, considering two replies to this article that I quoted at the bottom, mRNA lipid nanoparticle shedding is most likely. Why? Because the responders report experiencing STRONG IMMUNE REACTIONS.
Such byproducts would be CAUSING intranasal IgG in children as an immune reaction in children, rather than those IgGs being essentially mechanically spat from parents onto their children.
The article, while very interesting, is only the first step in researching vaccine shedding and I hope that further light will be shed (pun intended) on this phenomenon!
👍1
Strange Google Experience
I've just been on Google, looking for amusing pictures and typed into search,
"Pictures of a Bulldog chewing a wasp!"
And all I got were pictures of Hillary Clinton.
Even weirder still, is what I got for my next search?
When I typed,
"Pictures of a Pug licking piss off a thistle"
All I got were pictures of Madonna?
I've just been on Google, looking for amusing pictures and typed into search,
"Pictures of a Bulldog chewing a wasp!"
And all I got were pictures of Hillary Clinton.
Even weirder still, is what I got for my next search?
When I typed,
"Pictures of a Pug licking piss off a thistle"
All I got were pictures of Madonna?
🤣2
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Strange Google Experience I've just been on Google, looking for amusing pictures and typed into search, "Pictures of a Bulldog chewing a wasp!" And all I got were pictures of Hillary Clinton. Even weirder still, is what I got for my next search? When I…»
THESE signs show we're moving toward WORLD WAR III - Glenn Beck
Pay particular attention to what he says, from 08:14 onwards, especially if you live in the UK?
I haven't seen anyone touching on this, in the UK on any kind of media!
https://youtu.be/k7y3QEE_0xA
Pay particular attention to what he says, from 08:14 onwards, especially if you live in the UK?
I haven't seen anyone touching on this, in the UK on any kind of media!
https://youtu.be/k7y3QEE_0xA
YouTube
Glenn: THESE signs show we're moving toward WORLD WAR III
It seems like we’re going to be helping Ukraine indefinitely, and now President Biden has announced we’re even paying Ukrainian PENSIONS. But it gets worse. In this clip, Glenn demonstrates how signs TODAY show we are following the same pattern that eventually…
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «THESE signs show we're moving toward WORLD WAR III - Glenn Beck Pay particular attention to what he says, from 08:14 onwards, especially if you live in the UK? I haven't seen anyone touching on this, in the UK on any kind of media! https://youtu.be/k7y3QEE_0xA»
Forwarded from Memory Of Honor
"Many of THE GERMANS, too, from across the Rhine, advanced as far as Italy and inflicted many injuries
upon the Romans. They were in turn attacked by Marcus, who sent to them his lieutenants Pompeianus and Pertinax; and Pertinax, who later became emperor, greatly distinguished himself. AMONG THE CORPSES OF THE BARBARIANS THERE WERE FOUND WOMEN'S BODIES IN ARMOUR.”
— Cassius Dio
upon the Romans. They were in turn attacked by Marcus, who sent to them his lieutenants Pompeianus and Pertinax; and Pertinax, who later became emperor, greatly distinguished himself. AMONG THE CORPSES OF THE BARBARIANS THERE WERE FOUND WOMEN'S BODIES IN ARMOUR.”
— Cassius Dio
🔥1