Forwarded from Insider leak of the day
1. Stocks are falling like a recession is coming
2. Oil prices are rising like there's no recession in sight
3. Interest rates are rising like we have 10% inflation
4. Gold is falling like inflation is gone
5. Housing prices are rising like rates are falling
6. Commercial real estate is falling like its 2008
Nothing adds up here.
@Insider_leak_of_the_day
Share with your friends
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoqQLImUZsI&t=131s BOOOOOOOM! If true he has every right to be scared
YouTube
Dr. Steven Greer: "You have no idea what they are doing..." PREPARE NOW!
Dr. Steven Greer: "You have no idea what they are doing..." PREPARE NOW!
Dr. Steven Greer shares his views on challenging authority, questioning conventional wisdom, and exposing the truth behind organized religion, political parties, institutions, and social…
Dr. Steven Greer shares his views on challenging authority, questioning conventional wisdom, and exposing the truth behind organized religion, political parties, institutions, and social…
Forwarded from World Council for Health
Dr Mark Trozzi has just published an organized library of more than 1,000 peer reviewed articles which show that Covid-19 "vaccines" are harmful.
Please do bookmark and share this page for ongoing reference.
➡️ https://drtrozzi.org/2023/09/28/1000-peer-reviewed-articles-on-vaccine-injuries/
Please do bookmark and share this page for ongoing reference.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍1
Below: Excellent comment from https://fakeologist.com/what-is-controlled-opposition/
Especially the second paragraph (bold).
I've made slight edits to improve clarity (see above link to read original if you want)
----------------------------------------
Controlled opposition traditionally takes years to identify. The objective of a controlled opposition is to emerge as a "lifeline" to those seeking answers. Once a loyal following is built, then the misdirection or lunacy creeps in. Many then realise and jump ship to the new “truth speaker”, having wasted several years of their finite time. I estimate only 4 or 5 controlled opps are needed per generation. I've seen it half a dozen times in my life from people I wasted years with, adamant that they were forces for good.
Here's what you DON'T know – you are up against a system that is very old, very established, and has at its disposal generations of the finest minds who've honed the skill of human manipulation to scientific perfection. There are dozens of think-tanks working continually to this end. The correct starting point is understanding that you don't know anything.
Especially the second paragraph (bold).
I've made slight edits to improve clarity (see above link to read original if you want)
----------------------------------------
Controlled opposition traditionally takes years to identify. The objective of a controlled opposition is to emerge as a "lifeline" to those seeking answers. Once a loyal following is built, then the misdirection or lunacy creeps in. Many then realise and jump ship to the new “truth speaker”, having wasted several years of their finite time. I estimate only 4 or 5 controlled opps are needed per generation. I've seen it half a dozen times in my life from people I wasted years with, adamant that they were forces for good.
Here's what you DON'T know – you are up against a system that is very old, very established, and has at its disposal generations of the finest minds who've honed the skill of human manipulation to scientific perfection. There are dozens of think-tanks working continually to this end. The correct starting point is understanding that you don't know anything.
❤🔥2🔥1
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon
I found this in the deep pile of my email inbox.
Those who’ve claimed that “VAERS & Yelow Card cannot be used for attribution of reported concerns after c19 injection” might not know any more than the mantra “correlation is not causation”.
While that’s perfectly true, they all se to have missed two, vital, corollaries.
1. Where there is causation, there will be correlation.
2. The purpose of the monitoring systems is not to allow a reviewer to directly read off adverse effect risks. It’s purpose is to provide a mechanism for safety alerts which MUST prompt investigation, among other things, to see if attribution is reasonable.
There are well established methods for doing those investigations including, for example, looking at the time relationship to injections and reported adverse events. Events which occur rapidly after injection are simpler evidence of causation. If the time between dosing and the Yellow Card report varies from a day to a year, it would be much weaker evidence.
Another is to look at background incidence & compare that with the prevalence after the potentially causative intervention.
There are causation criteria & thresholds to determining causation, eg those of Bradford Hill, with an FDA threshold of 5 of 9 criterion being met signalling causation.
None of this is new, which is why some of us we willing, very eariy, to glance at the Yellow Card and especially VAERS datasets and put our hands up.
Last time I checked, all 9 of the Bradford Hill criteria were met after c19 injections.
This paper in what I would previously have considered a leading medical journal, is normie proof. Some of the authors are linked to regulators and others through grants to Pfizer.
It’s definitely causative.
It always was causative.
It was intentional. Which is why there’s no official announcement or government changing of stance.
Hold firm, parents. Just say no.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fda-sponsored-study-concedes-pfizers-covid-shot-increases-risk-of-myocarditis-in-children/
👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon
Those who’ve claimed that “VAERS & Yelow Card cannot be used for attribution of reported concerns after c19 injection” might not know any more than the mantra “correlation is not causation”.
While that’s perfectly true, they all se to have missed two, vital, corollaries.
1. Where there is causation, there will be correlation.
2. The purpose of the monitoring systems is not to allow a reviewer to directly read off adverse effect risks. It’s purpose is to provide a mechanism for safety alerts which MUST prompt investigation, among other things, to see if attribution is reasonable.
There are well established methods for doing those investigations including, for example, looking at the time relationship to injections and reported adverse events. Events which occur rapidly after injection are simpler evidence of causation. If the time between dosing and the Yellow Card report varies from a day to a year, it would be much weaker evidence.
Another is to look at background incidence & compare that with the prevalence after the potentially causative intervention.
There are causation criteria & thresholds to determining causation, eg those of Bradford Hill, with an FDA threshold of 5 of 9 criterion being met signalling causation.
None of this is new, which is why some of us we willing, very eariy, to glance at the Yellow Card and especially VAERS datasets and put our hands up.
Last time I checked, all 9 of the Bradford Hill criteria were met after c19 injections.
This paper in what I would previously have considered a leading medical journal, is normie proof. Some of the authors are linked to regulators and others through grants to Pfizer.
It’s definitely causative.
It always was causative.
It was intentional. Which is why there’s no official announcement or government changing of stance.
Hold firm, parents. Just say no.
Best wishes
Mike
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fda-sponsored-study-concedes-pfizers-covid-shot-increases-risk-of-myocarditis-in-children/
👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon
❤2🔥1