Below: Excellent comment from https://fakeologist.com/what-is-controlled-opposition/

Especially the second paragraph (bold).

I've made slight edits to improve clarity (see above link to read original if you want)

----------------------------------------

Controlled opposition traditionally takes years to identify. The objective of a controlled opposition is to emerge as a "lifeline" to those seeking answers. Once a loyal following is built, then the misdirection or lunacy creeps in. Many then realise and jump ship to the new “truth speaker”, having wasted several years of their finite time. I estimate only 4 or 5 controlled opps are needed per generation. I've seen it half a dozen times in my life from people I wasted years with, adamant that they were forces for good.

Here's what you DON'T know – you are up against a system that is very old, very established, and has at its disposal generations of the finest minds who've honed the skill of human manipulation to scientific perfection. There are dozens of think-tanks working continually to this end. The correct starting point is understanding that you don't know anything.

I found this in the deep pile of my email inbox.
Those who’ve claimed that “VAERS & Yelow Card cannot be used for attribution of reported concerns after c19 injection” might not know any more than the mantra “correlation is not causation”.
While that’s perfectly true, they all se to have missed two, vital, corollaries.
1. Where there is causation, there will be correlation.
2. The purpose of the monitoring systems is not to allow a reviewer to directly read off adverse effect risks. It’s purpose is to provide a mechanism for safety alerts which MUST prompt investigation, among other things, to see if attribution is reasonable.
There are well established methods for doing those investigations including, for example, looking at the time relationship to injections and reported adverse events. Events which occur rapidly after injection are simpler evidence of causation. If the time between dosing and the Yellow Card report varies from a day to a year, it would be much weaker evidence.
Another is to look at background incidence & compare that with the prevalence after the potentially causative intervention.
There are causation criteria & thresholds to determining causation, eg those of Bradford Hill, with an FDA threshold of 5 of 9 criterion being met signalling causation.
None of this is new, which is why some of us we willing, very eariy, to glance at the Yellow Card and especially VAERS datasets and put our hands up.
Last time I checked, all 9 of the Bradford Hill criteria were met after c19 injections.

This paper in what I would previously have considered a leading medical journal, is normie proof. Some of the authors are linked to regulators and others through grants to Pfizer.
It’s definitely causative.
It always was causative.
It was intentional. Which is why there’s no official announcement or government changing of stance.
Hold firm, parents. Just say no.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fda-sponsored-study-concedes-pfizers-covid-shot-increases-risk-of-myocarditis-in-children/

👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGJv335NJ/

THE RESISTANCE

"Vacunas Covid: Bluetooth y direcciones MAC" por Luis de Benito (SUBTÍTULOS EN INGLÉS)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPojTKWwE00 Sounds as though the truth about gay Nazi Zelensky is going viral in India. The girls should be very careful.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/senate-vote-stopgap-funding-bill-passed-house-avert-possible-shutdown The show must go on

Matt referenced GOLD again✨️

Gold shall destroy the Fed - Q

🟠 The percentage of Bitcoin supply held by long-term holders just officially reached its highest level ever at 76.09% 🔥

There's less than 1.5m bitcoin left to be mined, don't get priced out of your full coin.

Video by Wicked.