C-Rex_Sci-K-WWW2021.pdf
632.7 KB
Shits and Giggles 4: Dysentery like results (Drop 1)
Well,this is an interesting one. The person who's number I used in the previous shits and Giggles post, requested I tried the same technique, but with a number that they gave me this time?
I got 2 different, reverse Gematria results (getting letters from numbers, instead of numbers from letters) and to say the search results were very eye opening, is an under statement.
Not only are there several CIA documents, on Russian leaflet campaigns and handbooks, but several NASA related papers too.
So in this drop, the letter sequence I got, from the numbers they gave me were:
BE - C - AIFB
Well,this is an interesting one. The person who's number I used in the previous shits and Giggles post, requested I tried the same technique, but with a number that they gave me this time?
I got 2 different, reverse Gematria results (getting letters from numbers, instead of numbers from letters) and to say the search results were very eye opening, is an under statement.
Not only are there several CIA documents, on Russian leaflet campaigns and handbooks, but several NASA related papers too.
So in this drop, the letter sequence I got, from the numbers they gave me were:
BE - C - AIFB
CIA-RDP80T00246A005100370002-3.pdf
449 KB
Shits and Giggles 4: Dysentery like results (Drop 2)
Letter sequence attained fro changing the cypher used:
KE - C - JIOB
This sequences search results, though not quite as productive, we're no less interesting, as there were a few CIA related documents, along with se WEF reports and more.
Letter sequence attained fro changing the cypher used:
KE - C - JIOB
This sequences search results, though not quite as productive, we're no less interesting, as there were a few CIA related documents, along with se WEF reports and more.
Forwarded from Moral Obligation
Forwarded from sam fisher™
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
https://news.1rj.ru/str/moralobligation/1695
Sorry about this geeza, not watched it with the sound on yet, but...
Muted sound.
First 10 seconds, which is a zoomed in shot of the soldiers, you can't actually see them hitting anyone.
Guy on the left:
You can see their leg moving, like he's kicking, not so much a soft target, but almost as if his foot is hitting a solid object.
A soft impact, would still travel an inch or 2, with a tiny bit of resistance. His leg virtually stops dead.
The Guy on the right:
His foot is on the table and he's rocking the table, not with his foot on the guy on the floor. If he was rocking the guy on the floor, his knee would be lower. Also, is that a pair of slippers on his feet?
When did they become army issue?
As soon as guy 3 comes in, the phone is moved I'm guessing from an angle on the table, by the girl. Obvious cut, during black screen. The frame skips and quite harshly (their editor is digshit, if he fucks up a black screen cut... Those of you who're content creators will know what I mean?)
From that point on, nothing really happens and quite honestly, I've had a rougher manhandling by armed police here in the UK, than the treatment that guy gets after that cut.
Speaking of the guy getting a savage beating, he looks remarkably unscathed for a guy savagely beaten?
I'm assuming, though I can't tell 100%, from the position of the 2 guys, as the video starts, that he's being kicked in the head?
No cuts to his face, no real swelling etc
However, the quality of the footage isn't great, so that might mask that a bit...
The girl filming, whys she making it so obvious and keeping it perfectly in frame for the most part too, she's got quite a career in filmography of she keeps at it.
The soldier on the left, clearly looks as though he acknowledges the camera his eyes, so he's well aware of his being filmed, as are the other 2 soldiers.
Without any sound, it looks very much like the guy isn't even on the floor and the 2 men are attacking the table, to make it appear that they're attacking the guy.
When the screen cuts to black and jumps frames, that's when he came in from the back room and laid on the floor, before they resumed filming.
I'm assuming there's lots of shouting, screaming etc (remember, I've not seen it with sound yet?)
Yet, throughout the video, you don't see the faces of one person speaking, you see the back of the girls head, you see soldiers repeatedly adjusting their masks as they "talk", all of which could've been added afterwards in editing.
Right, that's my initial impression. Not watched it with the sound on yet.
But it looks fake to me so far, sorry to say.
Muted sound.
First 10 seconds, which is a zoomed in shot of the soldiers, you can't actually see them hitting anyone.
Guy on the left:
You can see their leg moving, like he's kicking, not so much a soft target, but almost as if his foot is hitting a solid object.
A soft impact, would still travel an inch or 2, with a tiny bit of resistance. His leg virtually stops dead.
The Guy on the right:
His foot is on the table and he's rocking the table, not with his foot on the guy on the floor. If he was rocking the guy on the floor, his knee would be lower. Also, is that a pair of slippers on his feet?
When did they become army issue?
As soon as guy 3 comes in, the phone is moved I'm guessing from an angle on the table, by the girl. Obvious cut, during black screen. The frame skips and quite harshly (their editor is digshit, if he fucks up a black screen cut... Those of you who're content creators will know what I mean?)
From that point on, nothing really happens and quite honestly, I've had a rougher manhandling by armed police here in the UK, than the treatment that guy gets after that cut.
Speaking of the guy getting a savage beating, he looks remarkably unscathed for a guy savagely beaten?
I'm assuming, though I can't tell 100%, from the position of the 2 guys, as the video starts, that he's being kicked in the head?
No cuts to his face, no real swelling etc
However, the quality of the footage isn't great, so that might mask that a bit...
The girl filming, whys she making it so obvious and keeping it perfectly in frame for the most part too, she's got quite a career in filmography of she keeps at it.
The soldier on the left, clearly looks as though he acknowledges the camera his eyes, so he's well aware of his being filmed, as are the other 2 soldiers.
Without any sound, it looks very much like the guy isn't even on the floor and the 2 men are attacking the table, to make it appear that they're attacking the guy.
When the screen cuts to black and jumps frames, that's when he came in from the back room and laid on the floor, before they resumed filming.
I'm assuming there's lots of shouting, screaming etc (remember, I've not seen it with sound yet?)
Yet, throughout the video, you don't see the faces of one person speaking, you see the back of the girls head, you see soldiers repeatedly adjusting their masks as they "talk", all of which could've been added afterwards in editing.
Right, that's my initial impression. Not watched it with the sound on yet.
But it looks fake to me so far, sorry to say.