Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Easy brainteaser: A man is born in 1940, lives a long happy life and dies in 2020. Yet on his tombstone it reads he was 20 years of age. This wasn't done by mistake, it was his real age. So how is this possible?»
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon
In my last post, I mentioned that “public health emergency” laws have been subverted over decades to be where we now are.
Within a few emails, I noticed this from Katherine Watt, paralegal, who as far as I know, is the world’s leading authority on the subject (the exception of course is senior government lawyers who presumably drew up some of the more recent changes).
Some people hear the outline and baulk. They refuse to believe it, and of course, if they really don’t believe it, they mostly won’t review the evidence.
It’s quite convoluted but it ends with the Alice In Wonderland situation where a senior government official, a lawyer, has the responsibility for deciding whether or not to authorise, for massed human use, a treatment incorporating novel technology which is intrinsically injurious, while declining to look at what many believe is clinical trials data (but isn’t, check the article).
Stepwise alterations to private property laws have been changed in analogous ways, and each step looks pretty inconsequential here, too.
There is an old saying that “Ignorance is bliss”. Whatever else you think about a circumstance where you’re under attack, I doubt you can stand this up.
I think the perpetrators are counting on few people even being vaguely aware of these two sets of law changes.
After all, Katherine Watt’s opening remarks are sobering. However, I have to point out that, like doctors, lawyers everywhere are members of a regulated profession.
The particular point of this article is to contrast the lash-up that is the floppiness of the emergency use authorization of dangerous products with the precision you’ll be required to meet if ever you were to attempt to make a claim for injury by such a product.
Best wishes
Mike
👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon
Within a few emails, I noticed this from Katherine Watt, paralegal, who as far as I know, is the world’s leading authority on the subject (the exception of course is senior government lawyers who presumably drew up some of the more recent changes).
Some people hear the outline and baulk. They refuse to believe it, and of course, if they really don’t believe it, they mostly won’t review the evidence.
It’s quite convoluted but it ends with the Alice In Wonderland situation where a senior government official, a lawyer, has the responsibility for deciding whether or not to authorise, for massed human use, a treatment incorporating novel technology which is intrinsically injurious, while declining to look at what many believe is clinical trials data (but isn’t, check the article).
Stepwise alterations to private property laws have been changed in analogous ways, and each step looks pretty inconsequential here, too.
There is an old saying that “Ignorance is bliss”. Whatever else you think about a circumstance where you’re under attack, I doubt you can stand this up.
I think the perpetrators are counting on few people even being vaguely aware of these two sets of law changes.
After all, Katherine Watt’s opening remarks are sobering. However, I have to point out that, like doctors, lawyers everywhere are members of a regulated profession.
The particular point of this article is to contrast the lash-up that is the floppiness of the emergency use authorization of dangerous products with the precision you’ll be required to meet if ever you were to attempt to make a claim for injury by such a product.
Best wishes
Mike
👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon
Forwarded from Youtube | Instagram | TikTok Downloader | Скачать видео/фото
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Twitter (𝕏) Media Downloader
This trilogy of songs employs the same formula, discreetly enough that it may just be a trend, may be unintentional.
Hey Fatty Boom Boom
https://youtu.be/UMSWoIKUt98
Slim Boy
https://youtu.be/JO6fLddgIfo
Gal You Fat
https://youtu.be/5yrOJfCS87U
🔗 Ned (@o0ned)
📲 @twittervid_bot
Hey Fatty Boom Boom
https://youtu.be/UMSWoIKUt98
Slim Boy
https://youtu.be/JO6fLddgIfo
Gal You Fat
https://youtu.be/5yrOJfCS87U
🔗 Ned (@o0ned)
📲 @twittervid_bot
YouTube
Carl Malcolm - Hey fatty bum bum
young, gifted, black :-D
Forwarded from Youtube | Instagram | TikTok Downloader | Скачать видео/фото
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚡1
Forwarded from Youtube | Instagram | TikTok Downloader | Скачать видео/фото
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Youtube | Instagram | TikTok Downloader | Скачать видео/фото
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
This trilogy of songs employs the same formula, discreetly enough that it may just be a trend, may be unintentional. Hey Fatty Boom Boom https://youtu.be/UMSWoIKUt98 Slim Boy https://youtu.be/JO6fLddgIfo Gal You Fat https://youtu.be/5yrOJfCS87U 🔗 Ned (@o0ned)…
Common trilogy formula
Pt1 comedy
Pt2 tragedy
Pt3 comedy
Pt1 comedy
Pt2 tragedy
Pt3 comedy
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
Common trilogy formula Pt1 comedy Pt2 tragedy Pt3 comedy
Used in The Godfather, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Indiana Jones and widely elsewhere
Aristotle's Poetics
Long Story Short
Romance
Happy start happy ending
Comedy
Sad start happy ending
Irony
Sad start sad ending
Tragedy
Happy start sad ending
Long Story Short
Romance
Happy start happy ending
Comedy
Sad start happy ending
Irony
Sad start sad ending
Tragedy
Happy start sad ending
Forwarded from Carroll Quigley
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.
Carroll Quigley
https://www.zerohedge.com/crypto/ecb-claims-bitcoin-has-failed-again-says-recent-post-etf-gains-are-flash-pan Panic! FUD (fear Uncertainty and Despair)