Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon
https://open.substack.com/pub/jamesroguski/p/two-months-to-flatten-the-who
James Roguski deserves an award, some kind of recognition for his dogged determination to bring to our attention what the WHO is up to.
Really, the WHO is merely a tool, used by shadowy organizations and individuals, to impose centralised control over notionally health related matters.
But it’s nuts. The WHO is primarily a bureaucracy. It’s not principally a technical agency.
Even if it was (& I’ve explained this before), consider the idea of “the next pandemic” (setting aside that this is fiction).
It’s a novel situation. No one knows what the best thing to do is.
Given that, why the dickens would you yield to a single Agency or individual on health matters local to you?
You shouldn’t. They cannot be better informed than you local health advisory function.
Theoretically, at least, they’re answerable to you and your community.
The WHO is not. If what they mandate is a disaster, you’ve no recourse. And they can’t know whether what they mandate is for the best or not, because it’s a novel situation.
Humans have a brilliant way of coping with novel problems. They each do what they think is best and they communicate often with each other, and quickly hit upon what seems to work best.
It’s not even necessary to know why it’s working vs not, initially, provided your information is as accurate as it can be and people are of good intent. It works well & it’s fast.
Even better, we all benefit from accelerated learning, because we see what happens under several different conditions.
It’s win, win, win.
So this placing decisions in the hands of an untrustworthy organization that made a lash up of everything it’s touched?
That’s a no from me.
If they did it, personally I’d ignore anything with WHO on it & take the consequences.
Please have a look at James’ summary.
I don’t know what is best to do about this. I’ll write to my MP, but she’s proven herself corrupt and useless in her appallingly slithery answers and failures to answer straightforward questions about the “vaccines” & pregnancy.
My fall back is to advise we tell as many people as possible about our concerns and to paint a picture of the possible outcomes. In my opinion, this is a central enabler in the global coup we’re living in. The more people who get it, the better our chances of something occurring.
So please try.
Best wishes and thanks,
Mike
👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon
James Roguski deserves an award, some kind of recognition for his dogged determination to bring to our attention what the WHO is up to.
Really, the WHO is merely a tool, used by shadowy organizations and individuals, to impose centralised control over notionally health related matters.
But it’s nuts. The WHO is primarily a bureaucracy. It’s not principally a technical agency.
Even if it was (& I’ve explained this before), consider the idea of “the next pandemic” (setting aside that this is fiction).
It’s a novel situation. No one knows what the best thing to do is.
Given that, why the dickens would you yield to a single Agency or individual on health matters local to you?
You shouldn’t. They cannot be better informed than you local health advisory function.
Theoretically, at least, they’re answerable to you and your community.
The WHO is not. If what they mandate is a disaster, you’ve no recourse. And they can’t know whether what they mandate is for the best or not, because it’s a novel situation.
Humans have a brilliant way of coping with novel problems. They each do what they think is best and they communicate often with each other, and quickly hit upon what seems to work best.
It’s not even necessary to know why it’s working vs not, initially, provided your information is as accurate as it can be and people are of good intent. It works well & it’s fast.
Even better, we all benefit from accelerated learning, because we see what happens under several different conditions.
It’s win, win, win.
So this placing decisions in the hands of an untrustworthy organization that made a lash up of everything it’s touched?
That’s a no from me.
If they did it, personally I’d ignore anything with WHO on it & take the consequences.
Please have a look at James’ summary.
I don’t know what is best to do about this. I’ll write to my MP, but she’s proven herself corrupt and useless in her appallingly slithery answers and failures to answer straightforward questions about the “vaccines” & pregnancy.
My fall back is to advise we tell as many people as possible about our concerns and to paint a picture of the possible outcomes. In my opinion, this is a central enabler in the global coup we’re living in. The more people who get it, the better our chances of something occurring.
So please try.
Best wishes and thanks,
Mike
👉 https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrMikeYeadon
James Roguski
TWO MONTHS TO FLATTEN THE WHO
If you are willing to join in this battle to expose the truth about the World Health Organization, NOW IS THE TIME TO TAKE MASSIVE ACTION.
Forwarded from Statista — Daily Infographics, Studies & Reports
The World's Biggest Arms Exporters
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the United States remains the world's largest arms exporter responsible for 41.7 percent of international arms sales between 2019 and 2023, up from 38.6 percent between 2017 and 2021. During the most recent time span, the country supplied arms to more than 100 countries.
France moved up to second position, overtaking Russia, whose share in exports has been decreasing recently. Between 2019 and 20213, France was responsible for 10.9 percent of global arms exports (slightly up from 10.7). Russia came just behind at 10.5 percent calculated as the average from prewar years 2019-2021 and those after its invasion of Ukraine from 2022 to 2023. In the five years before the invasion, Russia's share in global arms export had stood at a much higher 18.6 percent.
Russia's and France's biggest customer is India, which is the biggest importer of weapons in the world overall. France shipped arms to 64 states in the given time period and exports of its Rafales combat aircraft rose to almost one third of these exports. Russia's exported arms to 41 countries. Both countries as well as the U.S. ship the majority of their weapons to Asia and the Middle East, with big customers also including China, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
U.S. supply of weapons to Ukraine has played a big role recently, with Germany and Poland coming out as the top 2 and top 3 suppliers between 2019 and 2023. One of Russia's main customer is Egypt, while France also supplied more than 9 percent of South Korea's imports in the given time frame.
With Russia scaling back exports, the relative importance of other players in the global market - including China, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom - grew slightly. Spain overtook Israel and South Korea once more in rank 8 of the list of the world's largest arms exporters after the latter country briefly seen exports spike.
Source: Statista
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, the United States remains the world's largest arms exporter responsible for 41.7 percent of international arms sales between 2019 and 2023, up from 38.6 percent between 2017 and 2021. During the most recent time span, the country supplied arms to more than 100 countries.
France moved up to second position, overtaking Russia, whose share in exports has been decreasing recently. Between 2019 and 20213, France was responsible for 10.9 percent of global arms exports (slightly up from 10.7). Russia came just behind at 10.5 percent calculated as the average from prewar years 2019-2021 and those after its invasion of Ukraine from 2022 to 2023. In the five years before the invasion, Russia's share in global arms export had stood at a much higher 18.6 percent.
Russia's and France's biggest customer is India, which is the biggest importer of weapons in the world overall. France shipped arms to 64 states in the given time period and exports of its Rafales combat aircraft rose to almost one third of these exports. Russia's exported arms to 41 countries. Both countries as well as the U.S. ship the majority of their weapons to Asia and the Middle East, with big customers also including China, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
U.S. supply of weapons to Ukraine has played a big role recently, with Germany and Poland coming out as the top 2 and top 3 suppliers between 2019 and 2023. One of Russia's main customer is Egypt, while France also supplied more than 9 percent of South Korea's imports in the given time frame.
With Russia scaling back exports, the relative importance of other players in the global market - including China, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom - grew slightly. Spain overtook Israel and South Korea once more in rank 8 of the list of the world's largest arms exporters after the latter country briefly seen exports spike.
Source: Statista
https://news.antiwar.com/2024/03/17/uk-advises-ukraine-to-stay-on-defensive-in-east-and-focus-on-targeting-crimea/ A question for you Brits here, is your Government and country at war with Russia, do you think it would be wrong if they retaliate, are you ready for when they do?
News From Antiwar.com
UK Advises Ukraine to Stay on Defensive in East and Focus on Targeting Crimea - News From Antiwar.com
British military officials advised that Ukraine should focus on defense in its ground fight against Russia in the east while focusing on targeted strikes against Crimea and Russia's Black Sea Fleet, The Sunday Times reported. The advice was given when British…
Forwarded from Midnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸 (Karli Bonne)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🎦 TRAILER 🎥
*****
THE MIRACULOUS LIFE OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD (peace be upon him)
*****
THE MIRACULOUS LIFE OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD (peace be upon him)
🤮2
RAND_RRA2100-1.pdf
626.3 KB
RANDy RAND Let's see what's planned: RAND Corp Docs Mixed Bag (Drop 1 of 2)
Not taken a look at, what our friends at our favourite, multinational, military think tank; at RAND Corp, are up to, for a while have we?
Well here's a mixed bag of docs, going over what they've been doing?
1) Assessing and Suing
an Algorithm: Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisionmaking
2) Data collection and
sharing for pathogen
surveillance: Making sense of a fragmented global system
3) Artificial Intelligence–Based
Student Activity Monitoring
for Suicide Risk
Considerations for K–12 Schools, Caregivers,
Government, and Technology Developers
4) Report on the Arctic
Capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces
5) Report on the Arctic
Capabilities of the
U.S. Armed Forces: Appendixes
6) Intermediate Force Capabilities
7) Understanding the
Limits of Artificial
Intelligence for Warfighters
Not taken a look at, what our friends at our favourite, multinational, military think tank; at RAND Corp, are up to, for a while have we?
Well here's a mixed bag of docs, going over what they've been doing?
1) Assessing and Suing
an Algorithm: Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisionmaking
2) Data collection and
sharing for pathogen
surveillance: Making sense of a fragmented global system
3) Artificial Intelligence–Based
Student Activity Monitoring
for Suicide Risk
Considerations for K–12 Schools, Caregivers,
Government, and Technology Developers
4) Report on the Arctic
Capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces
5) Report on the Arctic
Capabilities of the
U.S. Armed Forces: Appendixes
6) Intermediate Force Capabilities
7) Understanding the
Limits of Artificial
Intelligence for Warfighters
❤1
RAND_RRA1544-1.pdf
833.8 KB
RANDy RAND Let's see what's planned: RAND Corp Docs Mixed Bag (Drop 2 of 2)
1) Assessing the Impact of Diverse Intermediate Force Capabilities and Integrating Them into Wargames for the U.S. Department of Defense and NATO
2) The Future of Indo-Pacific Information Warfare: Challenges and Prospects from the Rise of AI
3) A Framework for Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Digital Engineering: A Systems Approach
4) Using Modeling and
Simulation to Advance
Effects-Based Security
Forces Planning Developing Prototype Approaches to Estimate Risk Reduction Across Security Missions
5) Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions: Recommendations for Developing an Improvement and Evaluation Process
6) Harnessing the Power of Private Sector Innovation
to Defeat a Chinese Invasion of Taiwan:
Relighting Vulcan's Forge
7) Machine Learning-Enabled
Recommendations for
the Air Force Officer
Assignment System
1) Assessing the Impact of Diverse Intermediate Force Capabilities and Integrating Them into Wargames for the U.S. Department of Defense and NATO
2) The Future of Indo-Pacific Information Warfare: Challenges and Prospects from the Rise of AI
3) A Framework for Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Digital Engineering: A Systems Approach
4) Using Modeling and
Simulation to Advance
Effects-Based Security
Forces Planning Developing Prototype Approaches to Estimate Risk Reduction Across Security Missions
5) Identifying Gaps and Areas for Improvement in the FEMA Qualification System for Incident Workforce Positions: Recommendations for Developing an Improvement and Evaluation Process
6) Harnessing the Power of Private Sector Innovation
to Defeat a Chinese Invasion of Taiwan:
Relighting Vulcan's Forge
7) Machine Learning-Enabled
Recommendations for
the Air Force Officer
Assignment System