Forwarded from BRING THE NOISE
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Episode 9 - Ex Paramedic
Saturday - 13th July - 7pm
Matt talks of his experiences and some of the reckless care he witnessed during the "pandemic"
A pandemic he says he DID NOT witness - Matt noted it was AFTER the vaccine roll out, he saw the uptick in people become ill.
https://youtube.com/@bringthenoise.?si=eVhBWWGGbGXFXPPF
https://x.com/BringTheNoise_X/status/1811780715316383790?t=7EPqR4bNiLaDFWtumS9BHQ&s=19
https://open.spotify.com/show/18gwYB9AFGEpzCJuJHPrff?si=PypKeC-nTgC8N8kQ-7A8DQ
Saturday - 13th July - 7pm
Matt talks of his experiences and some of the reckless care he witnessed during the "pandemic"
A pandemic he says he DID NOT witness - Matt noted it was AFTER the vaccine roll out, he saw the uptick in people become ill.
https://youtube.com/@bringthenoise.?si=eVhBWWGGbGXFXPPF
https://x.com/BringTheNoise_X/status/1811780715316383790?t=7EPqR4bNiLaDFWtumS9BHQ&s=19
https://open.spotify.com/show/18gwYB9AFGEpzCJuJHPrff?si=PypKeC-nTgC8N8kQ-7A8DQ
Forwarded from UK Column Extracts
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Go And Look at ‘Sir’ Tony Blair’s Institute for Global Change - UK Column News - 12th July 2024
- GOV.UK (2021): Data foundations and AI adoption in the UK private and third sectors: Executive Summary
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change: AI Promises a World-Leading Future of Britain
- The Telegraph: The real role Sir Tony Blair is playing in Starmer's Labour
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (YouTube): Britain Needs a Practical Plan for Net Zero
- The World Economic Forum (2014): Why we need global solutions to globalisation's problems
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change: William Hague and Tony Blair: "Science Is the Single Issue All Our Dreams Depend On"
- Toms Hardware: Current AIs only have the IQ level of a cat, asserts Google DeepMind CEO
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (YouTube): will.i.am on the Power of AI in the Music Industry
Full news and all the source links: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-12th-july-2024
- GOV.UK (2021): Data foundations and AI adoption in the UK private and third sectors: Executive Summary
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change: AI Promises a World-Leading Future of Britain
- The Telegraph: The real role Sir Tony Blair is playing in Starmer's Labour
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (YouTube): Britain Needs a Practical Plan for Net Zero
- The World Economic Forum (2014): Why we need global solutions to globalisation's problems
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change: William Hague and Tony Blair: "Science Is the Single Issue All Our Dreams Depend On"
- Toms Hardware: Current AIs only have the IQ level of a cat, asserts Google DeepMind CEO
- Tony Blair Institute for Global Change (YouTube): will.i.am on the Power of AI in the Music Industry
Full news and all the source links: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-12th-july-2024
👍1
Forwarded from foxblog channel
Babylon Rising, Pt 1 https://studygrowknowblog.com/2024/07/12/babylon-rising-pt-1/ #babylon
Study - Grow - Know
Babylon Rising, Pt 1
Satan holds the world in his control now. Because of this, the world continues to move toward a time of unprecedented horror. What used to be hidden decades ago is now out in the open (LGBTQ, paedo…
Forwarded from Dr. Judy Mikovits
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you already thought Big Pharma was evil, wait till you hear this story.
It turns out that a non-addictive opioid drug formula exists, but Purdue Pharma blocked anyone from making it.
It gets worse. From 2016 to 2018, Dr. Martin tried to break this story to CNBC, but they refused to publish it, deeming it “not newsworthy.”
“Never once has this story been ever publicized, despite two years of me recommending to the CNBC editorial board that we cover it.”
Dr. David Martin says this move by Purdue Pharma, ignored by the media, led to “hundreds of thousands of deaths across this country.”
Join on Telegram channel 👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrJudyMikovitsHealthSecrets
It turns out that a non-addictive opioid drug formula exists, but Purdue Pharma blocked anyone from making it.
It gets worse. From 2016 to 2018, Dr. Martin tried to break this story to CNBC, but they refused to publish it, deeming it “not newsworthy.”
“Never once has this story been ever publicized, despite two years of me recommending to the CNBC editorial board that we cover it.”
Dr. David Martin says this move by Purdue Pharma, ignored by the media, led to “hundreds of thousands of deaths across this country.”
Join on Telegram channel 👇
https://news.1rj.ru/str/DrJudyMikovitsHealthSecrets
One Man and his Dog (and Cat): Starmer and his busy Hands - Sam Fisher YouTube
https://youtube.com/watch?v=V0yVAIcMBT4&si=LB0daCigwet84lzr
https://youtube.com/watch?v=V0yVAIcMBT4&si=LB0daCigwet84lzr
YouTube
One Man and his Dog (and Cat): Starmer and his busy Hands
#labourparty #sirkeirstarmer #nato #natosummit #ukraine #ministryofdefence #biden #tonyblair #mason
Link to my newest book,The Legion Saga: Prologue direct from the publisher
https://www.austinmacauley.com/book/legion-saga-prologue
My other book,…
Link to my newest book,The Legion Saga: Prologue direct from the publisher
https://www.austinmacauley.com/book/legion-saga-prologue
My other book,…
⚡2
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «One Man and his Dog (and Cat): Starmer and his busy Hands - Sam Fisher YouTube https://youtube.com/watch?v=V0yVAIcMBT4&si=LB0daCigwet84lzr»
One Man and his Dog (and Cat): Starmer and his busy Hands - Sam Fisher Data Toks
https://www.tiktok.com/@samuelnfisher/video/7391108472378641696?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7370088792113563168
https://www.tiktok.com/@samuelnfisher/video/7391108472378641696?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7370088792113563168
TikTok
TikTok · Sam Fisher Data Toks
Check out Sam Fisher Data Toks’s video.
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «One Man and his Dog (and Cat): Starmer and his busy Hands - Sam Fisher Data Toks https://www.tiktok.com/@samuelnfisher/video/7391108472378641696?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc&web_id=7370088792113563168»
Is this another ‘hand signal/sign’ @samfisher @rabbitleader ?
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
Is this another ‘hand signal/sign’ @samfisher @rabbitleader ?
Yes and No.
That one is actually a bit harder to determine, as most people adopt that hand position, as part of their regular body language.
It actually signifies an openness to discussion and a demeanor of deep contemplation, which is why, when someone does that, before beginning a discussion with them, it's a good sign that they're open to negotiation and are actually willing to hear your side / terms.
Or, it's used when someone is in deep thought, or quiet contemplation.
However, it is also seen and used, by particular masonic orders as a variation of the Square and Compass hand signal, itself also a commonly used hand position in people's regular body language depending on whether the sharpest point, made by the 2 fingers in the triangle, are pointing upwards. This makes adopting that position uncomfortable and deliberate.
My view.
Tate is an initiate.
That's without doubt. My suspicion is though, that first of all, that's not him doing a deliberate hand sign and second, that he, like Russel Brand are Royal Arch/ York / Oak Rite Masons, which are the more light side of the balance within Freemasonry?
That's just my best guess, so don't quote me on that, its just the vibe I get.
That one is actually a bit harder to determine, as most people adopt that hand position, as part of their regular body language.
It actually signifies an openness to discussion and a demeanor of deep contemplation, which is why, when someone does that, before beginning a discussion with them, it's a good sign that they're open to negotiation and are actually willing to hear your side / terms.
Or, it's used when someone is in deep thought, or quiet contemplation.
However, it is also seen and used, by particular masonic orders as a variation of the Square and Compass hand signal, itself also a commonly used hand position in people's regular body language depending on whether the sharpest point, made by the 2 fingers in the triangle, are pointing upwards. This makes adopting that position uncomfortable and deliberate.
My view.
Tate is an initiate.
That's without doubt. My suspicion is though, that first of all, that's not him doing a deliberate hand sign and second, that he, like Russel Brand are Royal Arch/ York / Oak Rite Masons, which are the more light side of the balance within Freemasonry?
That's just my best guess, so don't quote me on that, its just the vibe I get.
❤1
Sun Simulation and Giant Tree Stumps (Part 1): Hey Stumpy!
Ok, it's bubble bursting time, so some of you may not like what's about to be said here, but I think this needs to be said as logic seems to have, not so much left the building, but rather jumped out of a 20th storey window and plummeted to it's death, when it comes to these 2 topics?
All over TikTok, Telegram, X and even YouTube, the topic of is the Sun still real after the 8th April eclipse and also, another topic that seems to come out of the woodwork, before being absolutely trounced back under the rock it came from and to fester a few years before returning, that being Giant Tree Stumps.
Let's start with the Stumps first, shall we, as these are the easiest to get your grip back on, because it doesn't take too much logical thinking, to conclude this idea is completely infeasible.
Let's take the Devil's Tower, in the US, as a good example of an oft cited perfect example of an ancient giant tree stump.
The first thing to address is it's size. The Devil's Tower is 867 feet high and it's base encompasses 2.1 Square miles at it's base. It's flat top at it's summit is 1.5 acres.
So already, you can probably tell, it's pretty damn big and far bigger than it's photo makes it appear.
Let's just say, for arguments sake, that this was an ancient tree stump?
That trees total height would be roughly twice the size of Everest. Trees usually grow in height, a factor of 10 (so × 10, 10 times) the circumference of it's trunk.
So, you have a tree, twice the size of Everest and the first problem is, at least 1/3 of it, will be poking out of the atmosphere.
So no oxygen.
The tree, therefore, would die before it got that big.
But let's just say it stopped growing when it scraped the edge of space and it died.
When it did, it would fall over.
Now imagine, a tree, 2/3 the size of Everest. How heavy that would weigh?
That weight impacting the ground. What damage would it do to the surrounding landscape, as it impacted with the ground. You'd expect to see some sort of trench being left in the ground at least. A mountain range at most, stretching out from where it was, wouldn't you?
The same would be expected, if it was chopped down and speaking of which, who exactly would be the one doing the chopping?
The pictures below are of the Devil's Tower and the surrounding landscape around it. See if you notice anything?
Also, bear in mind that the Devil's Tower, in comparison to other proposed ancient Giant Tree Stumps, is barely a sapling...
Ok, it's bubble bursting time, so some of you may not like what's about to be said here, but I think this needs to be said as logic seems to have, not so much left the building, but rather jumped out of a 20th storey window and plummeted to it's death, when it comes to these 2 topics?
All over TikTok, Telegram, X and even YouTube, the topic of is the Sun still real after the 8th April eclipse and also, another topic that seems to come out of the woodwork, before being absolutely trounced back under the rock it came from and to fester a few years before returning, that being Giant Tree Stumps.
Let's start with the Stumps first, shall we, as these are the easiest to get your grip back on, because it doesn't take too much logical thinking, to conclude this idea is completely infeasible.
Let's take the Devil's Tower, in the US, as a good example of an oft cited perfect example of an ancient giant tree stump.
The first thing to address is it's size. The Devil's Tower is 867 feet high and it's base encompasses 2.1 Square miles at it's base. It's flat top at it's summit is 1.5 acres.
So already, you can probably tell, it's pretty damn big and far bigger than it's photo makes it appear.
Let's just say, for arguments sake, that this was an ancient tree stump?
That trees total height would be roughly twice the size of Everest. Trees usually grow in height, a factor of 10 (so × 10, 10 times) the circumference of it's trunk.
So, you have a tree, twice the size of Everest and the first problem is, at least 1/3 of it, will be poking out of the atmosphere.
So no oxygen.
The tree, therefore, would die before it got that big.
But let's just say it stopped growing when it scraped the edge of space and it died.
When it did, it would fall over.
Now imagine, a tree, 2/3 the size of Everest. How heavy that would weigh?
That weight impacting the ground. What damage would it do to the surrounding landscape, as it impacted with the ground. You'd expect to see some sort of trench being left in the ground at least. A mountain range at most, stretching out from where it was, wouldn't you?
The same would be expected, if it was chopped down and speaking of which, who exactly would be the one doing the chopping?
The pictures below are of the Devil's Tower and the surrounding landscape around it. See if you notice anything?
Also, bear in mind that the Devil's Tower, in comparison to other proposed ancient Giant Tree Stumps, is barely a sapling...
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «Sun Simulation and Giant Tree Stumps (Part 1): Hey Stumpy! Ok, it's bubble bursting time, so some of you may not like what's about to be said here, but I think this needs to be said as logic seems to have, not so much left the building, but rather jumped…»
Sun Simulation and Giant Tree Stumps (Part 2): It's none too bright in here!
Ok, onto Part 2 of my bursting of bubbles, Sun Simulation.
First of all, let's get the Elephant in the room out of the way first. Yes there are patents for various Sun Simulators, yes there are a few in use.
However...
None are orbital Sun Simulators. They're all ground based. They're also waaaaaaaaaay smaller than many of you might think and primarily used in agriculture, for use with hydroponically grown food and weather simulation experiments.
That's it.
No other uses, no other variations / sizes of it in use.
"But that's not what's in the sky. For a start, the simulated sun is white... Not Yellow! The Sun is always yellow!!", I hear some of you yelling from the back.
Yes, the Sun is Yellow... Except when it isn't. Do you know how long the Sun has been white for?
Roughly 11 years now.
After that, it'll be Yellow again, for 11 years.
After that, it'll be white again, for 11 years and so on.
Do you know why?
Because the sun has a maximum cycle of 11 years, with more solar activity, sunspots and magnetic storms.
Then it has 11 years, of it's minimum cycle, where it has less solar activity, sun spots, magnetic storms. But... Calling it a minimum, is kind of misleading as, though they happen less frequently, they're faaaaaar more intense.
The white colouration is due to this somewhat dormant state, as it's atomic and chemical structure is different and it's more volatile as a result.
Anyway, like last time, let's say for arguments sake that there really was a Sun Simulator, what would we see?
Well, for a start, for the sun to still be the size of our usual sun as we see it in the sky and just as bright, with our most powerful bulbs (led's likely) it would first of all, have to be twice the size of the sun to simulate the same light intensity and that would have to be twice as far away from the Earth too, so we could still see it and not be destroyed by the gravity from that very same object.
Result:
We all freeze. Because there's not enough heat coming from those lights and we're also twice as far away.
"But they're using mirrors not bulbs, so ner!!", I hear from the back again, "They're reflecting light from the actual sun, onto the Earth, so double ner!"
Is that so... Well, to make enough light, to light the whole sky and make, you know, daytime, you'd have to have a structure the exact same size as the Earth, in order for enough light to be reflected back onto the Earth. Also, you don't want it too close either because, gravitational effects on the planet, planet goes bang after it sucks in big mirror.
So you'd have to move the mirror further away. The further you move it, the less light it reflects at the Earth.
Less light, also means less heat = We freeze again, only this time it's dark.
"But we have it orbiting just past the moon, it's called the JWST", you say.
The JWST is tiny, we wouldn't see any light coming from it.
"But we have one orbiting and it's smaller, so closer..." you say?
Smaller, less illumination in the areas surrounding the direction the mirror is facing, meaning it will be daytime in New York and...
That's it...
Nowhere else would be in "daylight"
That's not to mention that New York would also be burning to the ground because, the closer the mirror is to Earth, the more focused the beam reflected and... Well, I think you get the idea?
Soooooo... Any questions?
Ok, onto Part 2 of my bursting of bubbles, Sun Simulation.
First of all, let's get the Elephant in the room out of the way first. Yes there are patents for various Sun Simulators, yes there are a few in use.
However...
None are orbital Sun Simulators. They're all ground based. They're also waaaaaaaaaay smaller than many of you might think and primarily used in agriculture, for use with hydroponically grown food and weather simulation experiments.
That's it.
No other uses, no other variations / sizes of it in use.
"But that's not what's in the sky. For a start, the simulated sun is white... Not Yellow! The Sun is always yellow!!", I hear some of you yelling from the back.
Yes, the Sun is Yellow... Except when it isn't. Do you know how long the Sun has been white for?
Roughly 11 years now.
After that, it'll be Yellow again, for 11 years.
After that, it'll be white again, for 11 years and so on.
Do you know why?
Because the sun has a maximum cycle of 11 years, with more solar activity, sunspots and magnetic storms.
Then it has 11 years, of it's minimum cycle, where it has less solar activity, sun spots, magnetic storms. But... Calling it a minimum, is kind of misleading as, though they happen less frequently, they're faaaaaar more intense.
The white colouration is due to this somewhat dormant state, as it's atomic and chemical structure is different and it's more volatile as a result.
Anyway, like last time, let's say for arguments sake that there really was a Sun Simulator, what would we see?
Well, for a start, for the sun to still be the size of our usual sun as we see it in the sky and just as bright, with our most powerful bulbs (led's likely) it would first of all, have to be twice the size of the sun to simulate the same light intensity and that would have to be twice as far away from the Earth too, so we could still see it and not be destroyed by the gravity from that very same object.
Result:
We all freeze. Because there's not enough heat coming from those lights and we're also twice as far away.
"But they're using mirrors not bulbs, so ner!!", I hear from the back again, "They're reflecting light from the actual sun, onto the Earth, so double ner!"
Is that so... Well, to make enough light, to light the whole sky and make, you know, daytime, you'd have to have a structure the exact same size as the Earth, in order for enough light to be reflected back onto the Earth. Also, you don't want it too close either because, gravitational effects on the planet, planet goes bang after it sucks in big mirror.
So you'd have to move the mirror further away. The further you move it, the less light it reflects at the Earth.
Less light, also means less heat = We freeze again, only this time it's dark.
"But we have it orbiting just past the moon, it's called the JWST", you say.
The JWST is tiny, we wouldn't see any light coming from it.
"But we have one orbiting and it's smaller, so closer..." you say?
Smaller, less illumination in the areas surrounding the direction the mirror is facing, meaning it will be daytime in New York and...
That's it...
Nowhere else would be in "daylight"
That's not to mention that New York would also be burning to the ground because, the closer the mirror is to Earth, the more focused the beam reflected and... Well, I think you get the idea?
Soooooo... Any questions?