Here are the Pfizer documents with side effects they wanted sealed for 75 years.

➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🇨🇦PCN | t.me/PrivateCanadianNews
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

President Trump Interview with Dave Ramsey will be out Wednesday October 2

Join the Trump Office Telegram channel

🚨🚨🚨Watch this video

Longshoreman strike starts at 12:01 am Tuesday when 45,000 dockworkers go on strike.

Will affect supplies and he recommends stocking up if you have the means.

@realMarjorieGreene

New tactics for our old friends!

Well, the past 24 hrs have been a fun little experience haven't they?
For those coming to the game late, we've had a new type of propaganda unit persona enter the fray the,

'Recent immigrant to the west'.

They joined the chat page a couple of nights ago, had Arabic lettering in his profile name. Admittedly, I'm only assuming they were a male, because they began their name with the prefix Mr. But they could quite easily have been a woman.
Anyway.
After one interaction with them myself and viewing their interactions with others, they were very easy to spot. Meaning this was an experiment to see how viable a strategy it was, to be used as a cover to infiltrate our pages on Telegram (seeing as their usual cover of, 'Rampant Far Right Neonazi', has become too easy to break and is also, unintentionally hilarious, on their part, too)

So with that in mind, what gave them away and what should you all be looking out for?
Because, even though I saw through them and i can proudly say, that a few of you guys weren't fooled either, there was still a sizable number of you who were and very likely because your default setting, isn't suspicion with a hint of paranoia, which isn't a bad thing just to be clear.

Ok, so what gave them away?

First of all, they spoke with enough broken English to be somewhat convincing at a tertiary glance, but seemed to know how to correctly spell quite complex words, for someone with their level of broken English and in the right context, with a fluent level of grammar too, which was also used in the correct way.
No one who speaks in broken English, uses correct spelling, context, syntax and grammar. When in an informal setting, such as in text messages and when in chat rooms, the way you communicate through your writing matches exactly to the way that you speak.
So you will write with the same rhythm, using the same lexicon that is unique to you, that you would if we were chatting face to face and we do this automatically, without even realising.
With that in mind, if your level of conversational English is such that, it comes across as broken, why would you use correct grammar?
Or syntax?
Or context?
Let alone know how to spell those English words, used in a broken way correctly and those words themselves, though used in a broken kind of way, not a single person speaking in broken English would even know exist in order to use them?
Most of you guys don't even know the correct way to use / correctly spell a great deal of the words he was using, or even use correct grammar and most of you lot are native English speakers.
So how they hell would they know that?

(That's not a dig at you guys btw, it's the fault of our education system, not yours. On the plus side though, it did make this guy easy to suss out, soooooo... yeah)

Levels of education aside, the other thing that, didn't necessarily give them away, but did spark up my red neon signs (which have burst yet again... I'm thinking of going back to using red flags, as they're far less dangerous?) was their use of very precise and quite complex statistical information. Now, granted, their sources were heavily skewed towards a pro immigration standpoint, that is released into the public domain by leftist NGO's etc and was, at least a decade out of date and debunked pretty much the minute it was first released, but that wasn't the suspicious part.
The suspicious part was, yet again, tied to his language comprehension levels and also being able to fake their understanding and being able to analyse, those statistics to use them in a debate setting in a convincing way?
Again, someone who uses broken English, wouldn't be able to understand what they were saying, to use that information as a counter argument, let alone the best time to use it?