Don't ask Gulagle AI or it will invent a COINTELPRO story about Wilhelm Reich was a criminal quack who died in jail. Ask Grok and it might give you the Nazi side of the story. In another twenty to fifty years, AI will autogenerate a Flat Earth version where Wilhelm Reich was an alias of a bankster gatekeeper like Marcia "COINTELPRO" Ramalho reports in her "Æther" video counterfeit documentary.
[6/23, 2:38 AM] Ned: This is what WR had to know in 1922 when he finished med school.
[6/23, 2:39 AM] Ned: in this case, orgonosis must mean "action by the orgone" and not "action on the orgone."


I've puzzled as "orgonotic" doesn't appear defined in any glossary despite widespread use in terms like "orgonotic pulsation," "orgonotic potency," "orgonotic contact," "orgonotic charge" and "orgonotic potential."

It's sorrowfully taken me this many years (as a cartoonist with focus in teaching math literacy but no specifically verbal language specialty) to figure.

Orgonotic
of action by the orgone

Orgonosis
action by the orgone

Where do I send this⸮
I can publish it to the channel @orgonecontinuum but what reasonable criticism may I expect?
How wrong am I?
I've never read the word "orgonosis" before.

Google {aorist definition etymology}

The aorist is a verb tense in classical Greek, and sometimes other languages, that indicates a simple, completed action in the past, without specifying whether it was continuous or repeated. It essentially describes an action as an event without further elaboration on its nature. The term "aorist" comes from the Greek word "aoristos," meaning "undefined" or "unlimited".
Etymology:

The word "aorist" originates from the Ancient Greek word ἀόριστος (aóristos), which is a combination of ἀ- (a-) meaning "not" or "without" and ὁρίζω (horízō) meaning "to determine" or "to set limits," plus the suffix -τος (-tos), which forms adjectives.

Therefore, "aoristos" literally translates to "undefined," "unlimited," or "not limited".
This linguistic root accurately reflects the tense's function of indicating a past action without specifying its duration or completion

Would you believe that watching Jurassic World made me think of it? And reading Asterix comix about indomitable Gauls of course!

Gulagle {why is it indominus rex and not indomitus rex in Jurassic world continuity error}

It seems there's a common misconception about the origin of the name "Indominus rex" in
Jurassic World, and it's not a continuity error as such, but rather a deliberate choice with possible explanations behind it.
Why "Indominus rex" and not "Indomitus rex"?
While the Latin word "indomitus" means "untamable" or "fierce", and would seemingly be a fitting denoscription for the hybrid dinosaur, the film creators opted for "Indominus rex". This choice has led to some discussion among fans and Latin scholars.
Possible reasons for the naming decision include:

Inaccurate Latin: The filmmakers may have used "Indominus" as a slightly inaccurate Latin construct, highlighting the scientists' or executives' potential lack of true understanding of taxonomic nomenclature, similar to a moment in the original Jurassic Park.
Symbolic Meaning: "Indominus" could symbolize the creature's attempt to claim dominance over the island, despite being an artificial creation, a "false pretender" to the noscript of "king" currently held by the T. rex (Rexy).
Anagram: "Indominus" could be an anagram for "I am uxor Dennis", which translates to "I'm the wife of Dennis" (referring to Dennis Nedry, a character from the first film).

The choice of "Indominus rex" instead of "Indomitus rex" in Jurassic World is not a continuity error. It's a deliberate creative choice that adds depth to the narrative and characterization, hinting at potential flaws within the park's scientific endeavors or serving as a symbolic representation of the hybrid's nature.

Government to ban Palestine Action, home secretary confirms - BBC News

F. A. F. O!!

🤣🤣🤣

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4g83l33wdeo

"The connection also of males with males defiles, because it is an emission of seed as it were into a dead body, and because it is contrary to nature."

Porphyry, On the Abstinence from Animal Food 20

Reproduction between men and women is a divine thing and a sort of quasi-immortality:
"All of us are pregnant, Socrates, in body and in soul, and, as soon as we come to a certain age, we naturally desire to give birth. Now no one can possibly give birth in anything ugly; only in something beautiful. That's because when a man and woman come together in order to give birth, this is a godly affair. Pregnancy, reproduction — this is an immortal thing for a mortal animal to do, and it cannot occur in anything that is out of harmony, but ugliness is out of harmony with all that is godly. Beauty, however, is in harmony with the divine. Therefore the goddess who presides at childbirth — she's called Moira or Eilithuia — is really Beauty."

Plato, Symposium 206cd

The two on the above could be a reflection on the lens, I am not curtain as yet.
But what I do know this was reported in a news paper in the 1800's as three suns reported.