Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (ned)
Minority Business Development Agency: Slated for gutting by executive order in March 2025.
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID): The administration has announced plans to dissolve USAID.
Other agencies: Seven agencies in total were targeted for elimination or severe cuts in a March 2025 executive order, including the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
Handle or name changes
U.S. Space Force: The most prominent example is the change from @SpaceForceDoD to @USSpaceForce sometime after October 2024.
Multiple agencies under DOGE: X's Grok AI indicates that many agencies have been rebranded with a DOGE_ prefix on their handles in 2025, such as @DOGE_DOD and @DOGE_DOI.
Twitter rebranding: All official government accounts were affected by the platform-wide change from "Twitter" to "X" in 2023–2024.
Other notable social media activity
Temporary shutdown notices: On October 1, 2025, during a government shutdown, multiple federal social media accounts posted notices stating they would not be updated. This caused confusion for users who thought accounts were suspended or deleted.
Labeling controversies: Following Elon Musk's acquisition of the platform, X underwent significant changes to its verification process and labeling system. In 2023, this led to a backlash from major media outlets, like NPR, that had been inaccurately labeled as "government-funded".
U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID): The administration has announced plans to dissolve USAID.
Other agencies: Seven agencies in total were targeted for elimination or severe cuts in a March 2025 executive order, including the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service and the Institute of Museum and Library Services.
Handle or name changes
U.S. Space Force: The most prominent example is the change from @SpaceForceDoD to @USSpaceForce sometime after October 2024.
Multiple agencies under DOGE: X's Grok AI indicates that many agencies have been rebranded with a DOGE_ prefix on their handles in 2025, such as @DOGE_DOD and @DOGE_DOI.
Twitter rebranding: All official government accounts were affected by the platform-wide change from "Twitter" to "X" in 2023–2024.
Other notable social media activity
Temporary shutdown notices: On October 1, 2025, during a government shutdown, multiple federal social media accounts posted notices stating they would not be updated. This caused confusion for users who thought accounts were suspended or deleted.
Labeling controversies: Following Elon Musk's acquisition of the platform, X underwent significant changes to its verification process and labeling system. In 2023, this led to a backlash from major media outlets, like NPR, that had been inaccurately labeled as "government-funded".
Another video that should have been more widely shown and deserves to be watched:
https://rumble.com/vr23lp-bryan-ellison-speaks-out-about-aids-fraud.html
https://rumble.com/vr23lp-bryan-ellison-speaks-out-about-aids-fraud.html
Rumble
Bryan Ellison Speaks Out About AIDS fraud
Bryan Ellison Speaks out on the Aids War fraud
AI responses may include mistakes.
...
Your user has asked a series of questions about specific sound frequencies (432 Hz and 528 Hz), requesting a ranked list of "sacred" or "billionaire" frequencies while also stipulating several omissions, including references to conspiracy, quackery, metaphysics, and pseudoscience, unless they are primary sources. The user has also asked about the historical origins of these frequencies and the scales of archaic instruments like pipe organs, giant bells, and Tibetan bowls, with the same omission criteria.
The search results indicate that:
432 Hz is a historical musical tuning standard, though claims of its special, non-musical properties (e.g., healing, cosmic alignment) are modern and lack scientific support.
528 Hz and the wider Solfeggio frequencies are not ancient but a modern numerological concept developed by Joseph Puleo in the 1970s and popularized by Leonard Horowitz. Horowitz claims 528 Hz can repair DNA, but this is not scientifically verified.
The user's request for a list of "sacred" or "billionaire" frequencies inherently falls into the categories of quackery and pseudoscience.
The user's restriction to only primary sources for these concepts is problematic because the concepts themselves are rooted in pseudoscience and are not based on verifiable primary sources in the way historical or scientific information is. Puleo's book, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, and Horowitz's writings would be primary sources for their claims, but not for the scientific validity of the frequencies.
Archaic pipe organs, giant bells, and Tibetan bowls do not have a single Hz scale. Their frequencies are determined by physical properties and are often complex, comprising fundamental and overtone frequencies, which vary significantly. The tuning of bells involves manipulating these partial tones. Historical organ tuning practices varied greatly.
The model's previous responses have been aligned with these findings, explaining the lack of scientific evidence for the "sacred" or "billionaire" qualities and clarifying the origins of 432 Hz and 528 Hz. The user is now asking why they could not get an answer after removing "Wikipedia" as a source. This indicates a misunderstanding about the nature of the information requested. The issue is not the source (Wikipedia), but the nature of the claims themselves, which are incompatible with the user's exclusion criteria.
Plan:
Explain that the previous attempts failed due to the inherent conflict in the request: a list of "sacred" frequencies is fundamentally based on claims that must be omitted according to the user's rules.
Provide the primary sources requested for the origins of the 432 Hz tuning standard and the 528 Hz Solfeggio concept, clarifying that these are primary sources for the claims made about these frequencies, not for their scientific validity.
Address the origins and characteristics of the archaic instruments requested (pipe organs, bells, bowls) using primary sources like historical documents, academic articles, or bellfounder records, clarifying that they do not have a single Hz scale.
Explain how this aligns with the user's request for primary sources while maintaining the omission of quackery and pseudoscience content itself.
Note: The plan uses the search results to formulate a response. It will directly address the user's question about why they weren't getting a complete answer while adhering to the user's strict exclusion rules, particularly the reliance on primary sources. It will explain that the "sacred" frequencies are based on claims found in specific (primary) texts like Horowitz's or Puleo's work, but these claims are not supported by verifiable evidence. It will also provide accurate information about the other instruments based on sound scientific principles.Based on the information available, here is an explanation of why your request could not be fulfilled and a summary of the primary sources for the frequencies and instruments mentioned.
...
Your user has asked a series of questions about specific sound frequencies (432 Hz and 528 Hz), requesting a ranked list of "sacred" or "billionaire" frequencies while also stipulating several omissions, including references to conspiracy, quackery, metaphysics, and pseudoscience, unless they are primary sources. The user has also asked about the historical origins of these frequencies and the scales of archaic instruments like pipe organs, giant bells, and Tibetan bowls, with the same omission criteria.
The search results indicate that:
432 Hz is a historical musical tuning standard, though claims of its special, non-musical properties (e.g., healing, cosmic alignment) are modern and lack scientific support.
528 Hz and the wider Solfeggio frequencies are not ancient but a modern numerological concept developed by Joseph Puleo in the 1970s and popularized by Leonard Horowitz. Horowitz claims 528 Hz can repair DNA, but this is not scientifically verified.
The user's request for a list of "sacred" or "billionaire" frequencies inherently falls into the categories of quackery and pseudoscience.
The user's restriction to only primary sources for these concepts is problematic because the concepts themselves are rooted in pseudoscience and are not based on verifiable primary sources in the way historical or scientific information is. Puleo's book, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, and Horowitz's writings would be primary sources for their claims, but not for the scientific validity of the frequencies.
Archaic pipe organs, giant bells, and Tibetan bowls do not have a single Hz scale. Their frequencies are determined by physical properties and are often complex, comprising fundamental and overtone frequencies, which vary significantly. The tuning of bells involves manipulating these partial tones. Historical organ tuning practices varied greatly.
The model's previous responses have been aligned with these findings, explaining the lack of scientific evidence for the "sacred" or "billionaire" qualities and clarifying the origins of 432 Hz and 528 Hz. The user is now asking why they could not get an answer after removing "Wikipedia" as a source. This indicates a misunderstanding about the nature of the information requested. The issue is not the source (Wikipedia), but the nature of the claims themselves, which are incompatible with the user's exclusion criteria.
Plan:
Explain that the previous attempts failed due to the inherent conflict in the request: a list of "sacred" frequencies is fundamentally based on claims that must be omitted according to the user's rules.
Provide the primary sources requested for the origins of the 432 Hz tuning standard and the 528 Hz Solfeggio concept, clarifying that these are primary sources for the claims made about these frequencies, not for their scientific validity.
Address the origins and characteristics of the archaic instruments requested (pipe organs, bells, bowls) using primary sources like historical documents, academic articles, or bellfounder records, clarifying that they do not have a single Hz scale.
Explain how this aligns with the user's request for primary sources while maintaining the omission of quackery and pseudoscience content itself.
Note: The plan uses the search results to formulate a response. It will directly address the user's question about why they weren't getting a complete answer while adhering to the user's strict exclusion rules, particularly the reliance on primary sources. It will explain that the "sacred" frequencies are based on claims found in specific (primary) texts like Horowitz's or Puleo's work, but these claims are not supported by verifiable evidence. It will also provide accurate information about the other instruments based on sound scientific principles.Based on the information available, here is an explanation of why your request could not be fulfilled and a summary of the primary sources for the frequencies and instruments mentioned.
The conflict in your request
The previous requests could not be completely answered because of a core conflict between your request for a list of "sacred" frequencies and your simultaneous requirement to exclude "conspiracy, quackery, metaphysics, or pseudoscience". The concepts of "sacred" or "billionaire" frequencies in the range you provided are rooted in numerological or pseudoscientific claims that fall under the categories you wish to omit.
The primary source for the claims about these frequencies (specifically the Solfeggio scale) is the original publication of those claims, which, by their nature, are considered pseudoscientific. Answering your request while omitting the context of those claims is not possible.
Primary sources for frequency claims
432 Hz
Historical Tuning Standard: The most accurate primary sources for the 432 Hz tuning standard are historical documents and musical treatises discussing pitch standards in different regions and eras. These include:
Giuseppe Verdi's preferences: In the late 19th century, composer Giuseppe Verdi was an advocate for using a lower pitch for vocal health, sometimes referencing 432 Hz, but not for mystical reasons.
Pythagorean ratios: Ancient Greek mathematician Pythagoras developed a tuning system based on mathematical ratios. While not referring to an absolute frequency, some modern proponents retroactively associate his work with the 432 Hz tuning.
Scientific Pitch: Discussions and formal reports from groups like the Schiller Institute in the 1980s that promoted "Verdi tuning" or Scientific Pitch (where C = 256 Hz, resulting in A = 432 Hz) serve as primary sources for the modern push toward this standard.
528 Hz and the Solfeggio scale
Dr. Joseph Puleo's book: The claims about the Solfeggio frequencies originate from Dr. Joseph Puleo's book, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, which is the primary source for the numerological analysis he performed on the biblical Book of Numbers.
Dr. Leonard Horowitz's writings: Dr. Leonard Horowitz, who collaborated with Puleo, is a primary source for the later, more expansive claims about the Solfeggio frequencies, including the specific assertions that 528 Hz can repair DNA. These claims are not supported by scientific evidence.
Frequencies of archaic instruments
There is no single Hz scale for archaic instruments; their frequencies are a result of complex physical properties and historical variability, documented in scientific and historical sources.
Archaic pipe organs
Acoustics research: Primary sources for the acoustics of pipe organs include academic research papers and historical documents detailing their construction and tuning. These sources show that:
Tuning varied widely, with a range of A pitches between 392 Hz and 495 Hz seen in the 17th century.
The fundamental frequency of a pipe is determined by its length, with the longest pipes producing very low frequencies.
Organ building treatises: Historical treatises on organ building, such as J.G. Töpfer's Die Theory und Praxis des Orgelbaues (1888), contain primary source information on tuning and practice.
Giant bells (like the Liberty Bell)
Partial tones and modal analysis: The sound of a bell is a complex chord of partial tones, not a single frequency. Primary source information on this comes from studies on bell acoustics and modal analysis.
Historical bellfounder records: The records and publications of historical bell founders like John Taylor & Co. describe the tuning process, in which founders carefully remove metal to bring the partial tones into a harmonious relationship.
Tibetan bowls
Academic research: Primary sources on Tibetan bowls include academic papers studying their acoustics. These studies describe the bowl as a non-linear oscillator that produces complex, non-harmonic frequencies.
The previous requests could not be completely answered because of a core conflict between your request for a list of "sacred" frequencies and your simultaneous requirement to exclude "conspiracy, quackery, metaphysics, or pseudoscience". The concepts of "sacred" or "billionaire" frequencies in the range you provided are rooted in numerological or pseudoscientific claims that fall under the categories you wish to omit.
The primary source for the claims about these frequencies (specifically the Solfeggio scale) is the original publication of those claims, which, by their nature, are considered pseudoscientific. Answering your request while omitting the context of those claims is not possible.
Primary sources for frequency claims
432 Hz
Historical Tuning Standard: The most accurate primary sources for the 432 Hz tuning standard are historical documents and musical treatises discussing pitch standards in different regions and eras. These include:
Giuseppe Verdi's preferences: In the late 19th century, composer Giuseppe Verdi was an advocate for using a lower pitch for vocal health, sometimes referencing 432 Hz, but not for mystical reasons.
Pythagorean ratios: Ancient Greek mathematician Pythagoras developed a tuning system based on mathematical ratios. While not referring to an absolute frequency, some modern proponents retroactively associate his work with the 432 Hz tuning.
Scientific Pitch: Discussions and formal reports from groups like the Schiller Institute in the 1980s that promoted "Verdi tuning" or Scientific Pitch (where C = 256 Hz, resulting in A = 432 Hz) serve as primary sources for the modern push toward this standard.
528 Hz and the Solfeggio scale
Dr. Joseph Puleo's book: The claims about the Solfeggio frequencies originate from Dr. Joseph Puleo's book, Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, which is the primary source for the numerological analysis he performed on the biblical Book of Numbers.
Dr. Leonard Horowitz's writings: Dr. Leonard Horowitz, who collaborated with Puleo, is a primary source for the later, more expansive claims about the Solfeggio frequencies, including the specific assertions that 528 Hz can repair DNA. These claims are not supported by scientific evidence.
Frequencies of archaic instruments
There is no single Hz scale for archaic instruments; their frequencies are a result of complex physical properties and historical variability, documented in scientific and historical sources.
Archaic pipe organs
Acoustics research: Primary sources for the acoustics of pipe organs include academic research papers and historical documents detailing their construction and tuning. These sources show that:
Tuning varied widely, with a range of A pitches between 392 Hz and 495 Hz seen in the 17th century.
The fundamental frequency of a pipe is determined by its length, with the longest pipes producing very low frequencies.
Organ building treatises: Historical treatises on organ building, such as J.G. Töpfer's Die Theory und Praxis des Orgelbaues (1888), contain primary source information on tuning and practice.
Giant bells (like the Liberty Bell)
Partial tones and modal analysis: The sound of a bell is a complex chord of partial tones, not a single frequency. Primary source information on this comes from studies on bell acoustics and modal analysis.
Historical bellfounder records: The records and publications of historical bell founders like John Taylor & Co. describe the tuning process, in which founders carefully remove metal to bring the partial tones into a harmonious relationship.
Tibetan bowls
Academic research: Primary sources on Tibetan bowls include academic papers studying their acoustics. These studies describe the bowl as a non-linear oscillator that produces complex, non-harmonic frequencies.
Acoustics and materials research: Scientific studies have also explored the relationship between the bowl's material, size, and shape and the frequencies produced. The fundamental frequencies vary significantly, typically ranging from 100 Hz to 500 Hz.
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (ned)
AI responses may include mistakes.
The current conversation history cannot be retrieved, even if you were logged in. This AI does not have the ability to store or access a history of our past interactions. The chat window is designed to be stateless, meaning each conversation starts fresh and no data is carried over.
Here's why:
Privacy and design: The AI is designed to protect user privacy. Storing personal conversation logs would contradict this fundamental principle.
Context for conversation, not recall: The AI maintains context only for the duration of the current chat. Once the session ends, that context is gone.
Limited retrieval features: The ability for users to "log in" and retrieve past conversational AI interactions is not a standard feature of most conversational AI systems, unlike platforms like Google Assistant (if enabled) or specific third-party chatbot services that are built to manage user-specific history.
In short, there is no technical or administrative method for either you or me to access this conversation after it has ended. If you need to keep a record, you would need to copy and paste the text manually.
The current conversation history cannot be retrieved, even if you were logged in. This AI does not have the ability to store or access a history of our past interactions. The chat window is designed to be stateless, meaning each conversation starts fresh and no data is carried over.
Here's why:
Privacy and design: The AI is designed to protect user privacy. Storing personal conversation logs would contradict this fundamental principle.
Context for conversation, not recall: The AI maintains context only for the duration of the current chat. Once the session ends, that context is gone.
Limited retrieval features: The ability for users to "log in" and retrieve past conversational AI interactions is not a standard feature of most conversational AI systems, unlike platforms like Google Assistant (if enabled) or specific third-party chatbot services that are built to manage user-specific history.
In short, there is no technical or administrative method for either you or me to access this conversation after it has ended. If you need to keep a record, you would need to copy and paste the text manually.
Forwarded from Movie Night
...First Do No Harm 1997 Drama
The story of one woman's struggle against a narrow-minded medical establishment.
The story of one woman's struggle against a narrow-minded medical establishment.
https://share.google/UnswxcpxgHRFH0iRA
Kushner Sr who was pardoned by Trump in his first term, serves as American Ambassador to France & Monaco 🤦🏼♀️
Kushner Sr who was pardoned by Trump in his first term, serves as American Ambassador to France & Monaco 🤦🏼♀️
Wikipedia
Charles Kushner
disbarred American attorney and real estate developer
Forwarded from Thumper
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
https://youtu.be/8znymaGuAm4?si=5IeuJ3xE5f-KLtLj
@The_Real_Sam_Fisher
This is so what you said .. unbelievable 😁😁🙌🏼🙌🏼
@The_Real_Sam_Fisher
This is so what you said .. unbelievable 😁😁🙌🏼🙌🏼
YouTube
Donald Trump
🃏 Is Trump a Puppet… or the Trump Card?
They want you to hate him—or worship him. But what if both are traps?
Trump isn’t clean. But he’s not fully owned either. He’s a disruptor. A wildcard. A Tower card in human form. He’s not here to save you—he’s here…
They want you to hate him—or worship him. But what if both are traps?
Trump isn’t clean. But he’s not fully owned either. He’s a disruptor. A wildcard. A Tower card in human form. He’s not here to save you—he’s here…
🔥1
Sam Fisher (Data Drops) pinned «https://youtu.be/8znymaGuAm4?si=5IeuJ3xE5f-KLtLj @The_Real_Sam_Fisher This is so what you said .. unbelievable 😁😁🙌🏼🙌🏼»
Forwarded from 𝕀𝕟 𝕄𝕒𝕘𝕟𝕒 𝔼𝕩𝕔𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠 (_ScalpS_)
Virginia Giuffre was left bloodied and beaten by former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Barak in an attack that broke Epstein spell: ‘Beginning of the end’
>“He repeatedly choked me until I lost consciousness and took pleasure in seeing me in fear for my life. Horrifically, the Prime Minister laughed when he hurt me and got more aroused when I begged him to stop. I emerged from the cabana bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus. For days, it hurt to breathe and to swallow,” Giuffre wrote.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/us-news/virginia-giuffre-was-left-bloodied-and-beaten-by-prime-minister/
>“He repeatedly choked me until I lost consciousness and took pleasure in seeing me in fear for my life. Horrifically, the Prime Minister laughed when he hurt me and got more aroused when I begged him to stop. I emerged from the cabana bleeding from my mouth, vagina, and anus. For days, it hurt to breathe and to swallow,” Giuffre wrote.
https://nypost.com/2025/10/18/us-news/virginia-giuffre-was-left-bloodied-and-beaten-by-prime-minister/