Forwarded from foxblog channel
They Want You Allergic to Meat—And They’re Not Joking
Western Michigan professors just argued it's morally permissible to let tick bites make you allergic to meat—because it might "improve your behavior." This isn’t satire. It’s bioethics by bioweapon. https://beefnews.org/they-want-you-allergic-to-meat-and-theyre-not-joking/
Western Michigan professors just argued it's morally permissible to let tick bites make you allergic to meat—because it might "improve your behavior." This isn’t satire. It’s bioethics by bioweapon. https://beefnews.org/they-want-you-allergic-to-meat-and-theyre-not-joking/
Beef News
They Want You Allergic to Meat—And They're Not Joking - Beef News
Western Michigan professors just argued it's morally permissible to let tick bites make you allergic to meat—because it might "improve your behavior." This isn’t satire. It’s bioethics by bioweapon.
Forwarded from Truth Seeker
Forward:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1LoNDoZtmF/
Ladies and gentlemen, why is everyone not doing this?
Walk into any store using facial recognition cameras and demand a copy of that data.
Do not leave until you’ve asked for it.
Under UK GDPR Article 15 and Section 45 of the Data Protection Act 2018, you are legally ennoscriptd to a copy of any personal data they hold on you — including facial recognition scans. If they refuse or fob you off, they are breaking the law.
They have one month to give you the data.
If they fail to do so, you can claim compensation — easily £2,500+ in many cases.
Now imagine if a thousand people did this.
The system would collapse overnight. They rely on you not knowing your rights. They rely on you walking away.
Come on people, there’s loads of you on here.
Stop shrugging it off and start doing it.
Even if just a thousand of you hit them with a Subject Access Request (SAR's), the whole rotten setup would be overwhelmed.
Knowledge is power. Use it.
Script to say at the desk:
“Hi, I believe your store is using facial recognition cameras. Under GDPR, I have the legal right to a copy of any personal data you’ve collected on me. This includes any images or facial recognition scans.
I would like to make a Subject Access Request for that data right now. Please log my request immediately.
I am ennoscriptd to receive this data within one month. If you refuse or fail to process this request properly, you will be in breach of GDPR and liable to fines or claims.
Please confirm you’ve recorded my request and tell me what the next step is.”
If they try to brush you off:
“If you’re saying you can’t do it here, please give me the full details of your Data Protection Officer. Just so you’re aware, failure to comply can result in a claim of up to £2,500. I know my rights and I’m exercising them.”
Useful links:
GDPR Article 15 (Right of Access): https://gdpr-info.eu/art-15-gdpr
ICO - Right Of Access:
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/individual-rights/right-of-access
UK Data Protection Act 2018 Section 45: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/45
ICO guide to Subject Access Requests:
1) https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/subject-access-requests/a-guide-to-subject-access
2) https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/subject-access-requests
ICO on Facial Recognition Technology:
1) https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2025/08/ico-clarifies-how-data-protection-law-applies-to-facial-recognition-technology/
2) https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/cctv-and-video-surveillance/guidance-on-video-surveillance-including-cctv/additional-considerations-for-technologies-other-than-cctv/facial-recognition-technology-frt-and-surveillance
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1LoNDoZtmF/
Ladies and gentlemen, why is everyone not doing this?
Walk into any store using facial recognition cameras and demand a copy of that data.
Do not leave until you’ve asked for it.
Under UK GDPR Article 15 and Section 45 of the Data Protection Act 2018, you are legally ennoscriptd to a copy of any personal data they hold on you — including facial recognition scans. If they refuse or fob you off, they are breaking the law.
They have one month to give you the data.
If they fail to do so, you can claim compensation — easily £2,500+ in many cases.
Now imagine if a thousand people did this.
The system would collapse overnight. They rely on you not knowing your rights. They rely on you walking away.
Come on people, there’s loads of you on here.
Stop shrugging it off and start doing it.
Even if just a thousand of you hit them with a Subject Access Request (SAR's), the whole rotten setup would be overwhelmed.
Knowledge is power. Use it.
Script to say at the desk:
“Hi, I believe your store is using facial recognition cameras. Under GDPR, I have the legal right to a copy of any personal data you’ve collected on me. This includes any images or facial recognition scans.
I would like to make a Subject Access Request for that data right now. Please log my request immediately.
I am ennoscriptd to receive this data within one month. If you refuse or fail to process this request properly, you will be in breach of GDPR and liable to fines or claims.
Please confirm you’ve recorded my request and tell me what the next step is.”
If they try to brush you off:
“If you’re saying you can’t do it here, please give me the full details of your Data Protection Officer. Just so you’re aware, failure to comply can result in a claim of up to £2,500. I know my rights and I’m exercising them.”
Useful links:
GDPR Article 15 (Right of Access): https://gdpr-info.eu/art-15-gdpr
ICO - Right Of Access:
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/individual-rights/right-of-access
UK Data Protection Act 2018 Section 45: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/section/45
ICO guide to Subject Access Requests:
1) https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/subject-access-requests/a-guide-to-subject-access
2) https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/subject-access-requests
ICO on Facial Recognition Technology:
1) https://ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2025/08/ico-clarifies-how-data-protection-law-applies-to-facial-recognition-technology/
2) https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/cctv-and-video-surveillance/guidance-on-video-surveillance-including-cctv/additional-considerations-for-technologies-other-than-cctv/facial-recognition-technology-frt-and-surveillance
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Art. 15 GDPR – Right of access by the data subject - General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller confirmation as to whether or not personal data concerning him or her are being processed, and, where that is the case, access to the personal data and the following information: the purposes…
❤1
Forwarded from Mind Control, MK Ultra, Monarch, Ritual, TI
Disturbing Interview w/Interlochen Alumni -Epstein/Maxwell Grooming Camp https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTvOxq2Cea8
YouTube
Disturbing Interview w/Interlochen Alumni -Epstein/Maxwell Grooming Camp
Elizabeth Verhey gives a disturbing interview about her time at Michigan Arts Camp, Interlochen. #Interlochen is the Michigan Arts camp where #jeffreyepstein and #ghislainemaxwell #groomed Victim#1. Verhey recounts a severe lack of adult supervision, Professors…
Forwarded from Dr.Q
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A viral video has sparked concern online, showing what appears to be man-made or “fake” eggs being filled and sealed by hand.
JOIN 👉 @DoctorQJr 👨⚕️🥼🩺
JOIN 👉 @DoctorQJr 👨⚕️🥼🩺
🤡1
Forwarded from End Child Abuse and Child Trafficking
20,000 More Emails from Epstein Released by Congress Testify to Trump’s Participation in the Epstein Child Trafficking Blackmail Operations https://healthimpactnews.com/2025/20000-more-emails-from-epstein-released-by-congress-testify-to-trumps-participation-in-the-epstein-child-trafficking-blackmail-operations/
Health Impact News
20,000 More Emails from Epstein Released by Congress Testify to Trump’s Participation in the Epstein Child Trafficking Blackmail…
After the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee published three emails from the Jeffrey Epstein estate yesterday showing how President Trump was part of Epstein's child sex trafficking enterprise, Trump and his supporters called "foul" claiming that…
Forwarded from End Child Abuse and Child Trafficking
New Dump of Epstein e-mails from the House Oversight Committee https://9east71.home.blog/2025/11/14/e-mails/
971blog
New Dump of Epstein e-mails from the House Oversight Committee
Epstein Estate Documents
🔥1
The Agenda: Their Vision - Your Future (2025) | Full Documentary (4K)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZFHHOBiUrkg&si=3wcpQIv4lsedG3wb
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZFHHOBiUrkg&si=3wcpQIv4lsedG3wb
YouTube
The Agenda: Their Vision - Your Future (2025) | Full Documentary (4K)
Support this project here 👇🏻
www.buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms
The Agenda: Their Vision | Your Future is a feature-length independent documentary produced by Mark Sharman; former UK broadcasting executive at ITV and Sky (formerly BSkyB).
In fiction and fact…
www.buymeacoffee.com/oraclefilms
The Agenda: Their Vision | Your Future is a feature-length independent documentary produced by Mark Sharman; former UK broadcasting executive at ITV and Sky (formerly BSkyB).
In fiction and fact…
❤1
https://youtu.be/S0fmq1zffGw?si=0CNhWyBoysAiwP4Y
This is definitely well worth a listen .. the lies & fabrication are shocking.
Charlie Kirk was covered in blood & so was this guy. His head of Security.
The day he was shot, only ONE entry wound & NO EXIT wound. 🍀🕊️🤍
This is definitely well worth a listen .. the lies & fabrication are shocking.
Charlie Kirk was covered in blood & so was this guy. His head of Security.
The day he was shot, only ONE entry wound & NO EXIT wound. 🍀🕊️🤍
YouTube
Brian Harpole - Groundbreaking Evidence From Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security | SRS #254
Brian Harpole served as a police officer in Texas for 14 years, holding a variety of assignments including patrol, tactical operations, criminal and narcotics interdiction, bicycle unit, training, and administration. Over the course of his law enforcement…
❤1
Forwarded from The Islander
The greatest irony in modern finance? The EU is so desperate to steal Russia’s sovereign assets that its own custodian — Euroclear, is now warning it may sue Brussels if they try it. When your vault threatens to drag you into court for breaking the law, you no longer have a financial order, you have a cartel panicking under its own lies.
Euroclear, the Belgian securities giant holding roughly €185–200 billion in Russian sovereign reserves, has quietly delivered the EU a message sharper than any Kremlin statement: If you force us to hand over frozen Russian central bank assets for your €140 billion Ukraine scheme, you’re exposing us to massive legal liability and we will take you to court.
This isn’t a sideshow. Euroclear is the core of the EU’s financial plumbing. It’s where states, banks, institutions, pension funds, and sovereign wealth vehicles settle their transactions. It’s the reason Brussels pretends to be a safe custodian of global capital.
And now? The custodian is telling the political class, “If you break international law to rob Moscow, you break us, and we will drag you into the dock with us.”
Euroclear’s fear is justified. Under the 1989 Belgium–Russia Bilateral Investment Treaty, unlawful expropriation of Russian sovereign property exposes Belgium (and by extension the EU) to massive damages. Add to that customary international law, the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, and the legal principle of sovereign asset inviolability, and the EU has nearly zero legal ground to seize anything.
That’s why Euroclear’s lawyers reportedly told Belgian officials they could face a legal hurricane:
•Russia sues Belgium for expropriation
•Euroclear sues the EU for forcing unlawful actions
•Third‑country depositors pull funds, fearing Brussels can no longer be trusted
This is why Belgium’s Prime Minister Bart De Wever is blocking the plan, he’s not protecting Russia, he’s protecting Belgium from the EU. He knows that if Brussels goes through with this heist, the first court case won’t be in Moscow. It will be in Brussels — Euroclear v. EC.
And that’s before Russia responds economically. Because once you cross this line, every non‑Western country from China, India, Gulf states, ASEAN, Africa, Latin America, will begin loudly unloading Euroclear exposure. Nobody will keep reserves in a jurisdiction willing to weaponize other people’s money.
That is how the post‑WWII financial order dies, not with tanks, but with a lawsuit and a stampede of capital fleeing the eurozone.
Which is why the EU is in total panic mode.
Ukraine’s “Ukraine Facility” is essentially empty, only €18 billion remains. Kiev needs €60 billion more just to survive 2026–27, those gold toilets don't pay for themselves. The U.S. is retrenching under Trump, IMF support depends on the EU loan, and national budgets are already imploding.
So Brussels is left with one play... Steal Russia’s sovereign reserves and pray the courts look the other way.
But Euroclear just declared:
“If you make us commit the theft, we won’t protect you when the lawyers come.”
This is the moment the entire Global Majority has been waiting for, that is the West proving, in broad daylight, that it cannot be trusted with sovereign deposits.
A multipolar financial system doesn’t need a manifesto. It only needs to point at Brussels and say: “This is why we no longer keep our money there.”
The EU thought it could rewrite international law by royal decree. Instead, it has cornered itself into a showdown with its own financial backbone. If the EU crosses this line, it won’t just lose a court case, it will lose the trust of the world, the credibility of the euro, and it's fiat Ponzi.
So now Euroclear must sue not to defend Russia, but to save Europe from a precedent that would torch five centuries of financial credibility. And when the lawsuits come, and the dust settles, the West won’t just be broke, it’ll be radioactive to capital.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work
Euroclear, the Belgian securities giant holding roughly €185–200 billion in Russian sovereign reserves, has quietly delivered the EU a message sharper than any Kremlin statement: If you force us to hand over frozen Russian central bank assets for your €140 billion Ukraine scheme, you’re exposing us to massive legal liability and we will take you to court.
This isn’t a sideshow. Euroclear is the core of the EU’s financial plumbing. It’s where states, banks, institutions, pension funds, and sovereign wealth vehicles settle their transactions. It’s the reason Brussels pretends to be a safe custodian of global capital.
And now? The custodian is telling the political class, “If you break international law to rob Moscow, you break us, and we will drag you into the dock with us.”
Euroclear’s fear is justified. Under the 1989 Belgium–Russia Bilateral Investment Treaty, unlawful expropriation of Russian sovereign property exposes Belgium (and by extension the EU) to massive damages. Add to that customary international law, the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, and the legal principle of sovereign asset inviolability, and the EU has nearly zero legal ground to seize anything.
That’s why Euroclear’s lawyers reportedly told Belgian officials they could face a legal hurricane:
•Russia sues Belgium for expropriation
•Euroclear sues the EU for forcing unlawful actions
•Third‑country depositors pull funds, fearing Brussels can no longer be trusted
This is why Belgium’s Prime Minister Bart De Wever is blocking the plan, he’s not protecting Russia, he’s protecting Belgium from the EU. He knows that if Brussels goes through with this heist, the first court case won’t be in Moscow. It will be in Brussels — Euroclear v. EC.
And that’s before Russia responds economically. Because once you cross this line, every non‑Western country from China, India, Gulf states, ASEAN, Africa, Latin America, will begin loudly unloading Euroclear exposure. Nobody will keep reserves in a jurisdiction willing to weaponize other people’s money.
That is how the post‑WWII financial order dies, not with tanks, but with a lawsuit and a stampede of capital fleeing the eurozone.
Which is why the EU is in total panic mode.
Ukraine’s “Ukraine Facility” is essentially empty, only €18 billion remains. Kiev needs €60 billion more just to survive 2026–27, those gold toilets don't pay for themselves. The U.S. is retrenching under Trump, IMF support depends on the EU loan, and national budgets are already imploding.
So Brussels is left with one play... Steal Russia’s sovereign reserves and pray the courts look the other way.
But Euroclear just declared:
“If you make us commit the theft, we won’t protect you when the lawyers come.”
This is the moment the entire Global Majority has been waiting for, that is the West proving, in broad daylight, that it cannot be trusted with sovereign deposits.
A multipolar financial system doesn’t need a manifesto. It only needs to point at Brussels and say: “This is why we no longer keep our money there.”
The EU thought it could rewrite international law by royal decree. Instead, it has cornered itself into a showdown with its own financial backbone. If the EU crosses this line, it won’t just lose a court case, it will lose the trust of the world, the credibility of the euro, and it's fiat Ponzi.
So now Euroclear must sue not to defend Russia, but to save Europe from a precedent that would torch five centuries of financial credibility. And when the lawsuits come, and the dust settles, the West won’t just be broke, it’ll be radioactive to capital.
🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews
Donate - Support Our Work