British Peer, Mark Malloch Brown was the Chairman of the Board of Smartmatic between 2014-2021.
Brown was promoted to be President of George Soros’ Open Society Foundation, where he served until June of last year.
Smartmatic Headquarters and Office Locations Smartmatic is headquartered in London, 4th floor, 88 Baker St, Marylebone, United Kingdom, and has 16 office locations
Forwarded from Katie Hopkins
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trumpy Trump Trump just pardoned two turkeys Gobble and Waddle.
Coincidentally these are his nicknames for Kamala and Biden
@KatieHopkins_1
Coincidentally these are his nicknames for Kamala and Biden
@KatieHopkins_1
Can 'they' do that? can they drop jury service in the kingdom, isnt that something that the people there fought over and won the right to be tried by a independent jury? .. Is this more of little gruppenfuhrer Starmer's WEF neo nazi insanity or is it BS?
Fcuking hell, its not BS https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2025/11/20/right-to-trial/
Canary
Ministry of Justice set to take away the right to a trial by jury
Right to a trial could be scrapped as campaigners warn "reducing jury rights will inevitably increase the number of miscarriages of justice"
Forwarded from Mind Control, MK Ultra, Monarch, Ritual, TI
The Hidden Dangers of High-Functioning Predators w/ Dr. Karen Mitchell https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO8hzhLKsKE&t=1s
YouTube
The Hidden Dangers of High-Functioning Predators w/ Dr. Karen Mitchell
In this powerful and revealing episode, filmmaker Mark Vicente sits down with Dr. Karen Mitchell, founder of the Kalmor Institute and the author of one of the most groundbreaking PhD theses ever written on dark personalities.
@DrKarenMitchell1
https://kalmor.com.au/…
@DrKarenMitchell1
https://kalmor.com.au/…
Forwarded from Movie Night
Blue Moon 2025 Drama/Comedy
Tells the story of Lorenz Hart's struggles with alcoholism and mental health as he tries to save face during the opening of "Oklahoma!".
Tells the story of Lorenz Hart's struggles with alcoholism and mental health as he tries to save face during the opening of "Oklahoma!".
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Go you Tucker 👏🏻👏🏻
Forwarded from Orgone Channel Telegram (ned)
AI responses may confabulate.
Eddies, or local variations, in magnetic flux density are typically detected using specialized
magnetic sensors in a process called Eddy Current Testing (ECT) or Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) testing. The degree of accuracy depends heavily on the sensor technology used and the application, with some advanced systems achieving sensitivities in the femtotesla (fT) range or spatial resolutions of less than a millimeter.
Detection Methods
The primary method for detecting localized magnetic variations is using sensors that measure changes in a magnetic field:
Eddy Current Testing (ECT): This is a key non-destructive evaluation technique. An alternating current in an excitation coil induces eddy currents in a conductive test material. Defects or variations in the material (like cracks or changes in conductivity/permeability) disrupt the flow of these induced currents, which in turn alters the secondary magnetic field they produce. A sensor, often a pick-up coil or a magnetic sensor, measures the resulting changes in the amplitude and phase of the magnetic field (or the impedance of the coil) to identify the defect.
Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL): This method is mainly used for ferromagnetic materials (e.g., pipelines). The material is magnetized close to saturation. If a defect is present, the magnetic field "leaks" out of the material's surface because the defect has much lower magnetic permeability. Magnetic sensors, typically Hall effect sensors or magnetoresistive (MR) sensors, are used to detect this leakage field.
High-Resolution Sensors: Modern systems employ advanced magnetic sensors for higher sensitivity and spatial resolution:
Hall Effect Sensors: These produce a voltage proportional to the applied magnetic field. They are compact, reliable, and a common choice for MFL measurements.
Magnetoresistive (MR) Sensors: These sensors (including AMR, GMR, and TMR) change their electrical resistance in the presence of a magnetic field. GMR and TMR sensors offer very high sensitivity and can be arranged in dense arrays for high-resolution mapping of surface defects.
SQUID (Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices): These are extremely sensitive magnetometers used for measuring very small magnetic field changes, often in laboratory or specialized environments due to the need for cryogenic cooling.
Degree of Accuracy
The accuracy and sensitivity for detecting these variations vary significantly by the technology and specific instrumentation used:
Resolution and Sensitivity:
General-purpose, handheld gaussmeters/magnetometers using Hall effect sensors can have a resolution of a few microteslas (µT) or better.
High-sensitivity magnetometers, such as optically pumped magnetometers or SQUIDs, can detect fields in the picotesla (pT) or even femtotesla (fT) range.
In a specific eddy current non-destructive testing system, the standard deviation for amplitude was found to be about 0.8 mV and for the phase angle about 48 arcseconds, which successfully identified a 1 mm wide by 1 mm deep defect.
Spatial Resolution: Using sensor arrays (e.g., GMR arrays) allows for high spatial resolution, with the ability to detect defects as small as 0.44 mm in diameter with a separation of less than 2 mm.
Overall Accuracy: The absolute accuracy of commercial magnetometers can range from a few percent of the reading to parts per million (ppm) depending on the quality and type of the instrument. System errors and environmental factors (like temperature drift or external magnetic fields) often need to be compensated for to achieve optimal accuracy.
Eddies, or local variations, in magnetic flux density are typically detected using specialized
magnetic sensors in a process called Eddy Current Testing (ECT) or Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) testing. The degree of accuracy depends heavily on the sensor technology used and the application, with some advanced systems achieving sensitivities in the femtotesla (fT) range or spatial resolutions of less than a millimeter.
Detection Methods
The primary method for detecting localized magnetic variations is using sensors that measure changes in a magnetic field:
Eddy Current Testing (ECT): This is a key non-destructive evaluation technique. An alternating current in an excitation coil induces eddy currents in a conductive test material. Defects or variations in the material (like cracks or changes in conductivity/permeability) disrupt the flow of these induced currents, which in turn alters the secondary magnetic field they produce. A sensor, often a pick-up coil or a magnetic sensor, measures the resulting changes in the amplitude and phase of the magnetic field (or the impedance of the coil) to identify the defect.
Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL): This method is mainly used for ferromagnetic materials (e.g., pipelines). The material is magnetized close to saturation. If a defect is present, the magnetic field "leaks" out of the material's surface because the defect has much lower magnetic permeability. Magnetic sensors, typically Hall effect sensors or magnetoresistive (MR) sensors, are used to detect this leakage field.
High-Resolution Sensors: Modern systems employ advanced magnetic sensors for higher sensitivity and spatial resolution:
Hall Effect Sensors: These produce a voltage proportional to the applied magnetic field. They are compact, reliable, and a common choice for MFL measurements.
Magnetoresistive (MR) Sensors: These sensors (including AMR, GMR, and TMR) change their electrical resistance in the presence of a magnetic field. GMR and TMR sensors offer very high sensitivity and can be arranged in dense arrays for high-resolution mapping of surface defects.
SQUID (Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices): These are extremely sensitive magnetometers used for measuring very small magnetic field changes, often in laboratory or specialized environments due to the need for cryogenic cooling.
Degree of Accuracy
The accuracy and sensitivity for detecting these variations vary significantly by the technology and specific instrumentation used:
Resolution and Sensitivity:
General-purpose, handheld gaussmeters/magnetometers using Hall effect sensors can have a resolution of a few microteslas (µT) or better.
High-sensitivity magnetometers, such as optically pumped magnetometers or SQUIDs, can detect fields in the picotesla (pT) or even femtotesla (fT) range.
In a specific eddy current non-destructive testing system, the standard deviation for amplitude was found to be about 0.8 mV and for the phase angle about 48 arcseconds, which successfully identified a 1 mm wide by 1 mm deep defect.
Spatial Resolution: Using sensor arrays (e.g., GMR arrays) allows for high spatial resolution, with the ability to detect defects as small as 0.44 mm in diameter with a separation of less than 2 mm.
Overall Accuracy: The absolute accuracy of commercial magnetometers can range from a few percent of the reading to parts per million (ppm) depending on the quality and type of the instrument. System errors and environmental factors (like temperature drift or external magnetic fields) often need to be compensated for to achieve optimal accuracy.