Forwarded from Thumper
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Insider (Private)
Silver isn’t rallying because of retail.
It’s rallying because institutions are trapped.
India’s Silver ETFs, the biggest retail sentiment gauge, are still trading at a discount at the lower end of their mean deviation band.
No premiums.
No inflows.
No crowd frenzy.
Retail hasn’t even shown up.
Yet price is going vertical.
That’s not hype.
That’s structural stress, COMEX shorts being forced to unwind while the public is still on the sidelines.
This isn’t a top.
This is the phase before the real mania begins.
When ETFs flip from discount → premium,
that’s when the retail wave hits.
@Insider_leak_of_theday
Share with your friends
It’s rallying because institutions are trapped.
India’s Silver ETFs, the biggest retail sentiment gauge, are still trading at a discount at the lower end of their mean deviation band.
No premiums.
No inflows.
No crowd frenzy.
Retail hasn’t even shown up.
Yet price is going vertical.
That’s not hype.
That’s structural stress, COMEX shorts being forced to unwind while the public is still on the sidelines.
This isn’t a top.
This is the phase before the real mania begins.
When ETFs flip from discount → premium,
that’s when the retail wave hits.
@Insider_leak_of_theday
Share with your friends
On Thursday, officials in the little kingdom pledged to roll out a country-wide facial recognition system to help police track down criminals. The country’s ministers have launched a 10-week consultation to analyse the regulatory and privacy framework of their AI-powered surveillance panopticon — but one way or another, the all-seeing eye is on its way. https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/police-uk-surveillance-ai How did it get to this point where Britain actually turned into some sort of Orwellian dystopian state?
Futurism
Police Admit AI Surveillance Panopticon Still Has Issues With "Some Demographic Groups"
Government analysts found that the UK's rapidly expanding AI surveillance system is horribly biased toward Black and Asian people.
👀1
Forwarded from Can we please just cut to the FAKE ALIEN invasion part
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
https://www.westernjournal.com/dystopia-uk-woman-recalls-arrested-multiple-officers-hate-crime-naked-sending-harmless-text-message/ How did it get to this? What happened to free speech?
The Western Journal
Dystopia: UK Woman Recalls Being Arrested by Multiple Officers for Hate Crime While She Was Naked, After Sending Harmless Text…
A mother of four was arrested while naked in her bathtub in the UK; her crime was sending an offensive text message.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How did it get to this? What happened to the nations IQ level?
🤯1
Forwarded from The Butthurts
US could ask foreign tourists for five-year social media history before entry https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1dz0g2ykpeo
BBC News
US could ask tourists for five-year social media history before entry
The plan would affect people from countries, including the UK, who can fill out a form in lieu of a visa.
👀1
Forwarded from foxblog channel
Forwarded from Hungry Dog Press
AI responses may confabulate and track hyperlink activity.
The earliest known attestation of the idiom "conspiracy theory" in the English language appeared in the mid-19th century.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary and other sources, the earliest known uses of the term occurred around the American Civil War.
1863: The earliest documented use is in a letter to the editor of The New York Times on January 11, 1863. The author, Charles Astor Bristed, used "conspiracy theory" to dismiss claims about British aristocrats conspiring against the U.S. The phrase already carried a dismissive tone, suggesting an improbable explanation.
1860s-1880s: The term saw increased use after President James A. Garfield's assassination in 1881, when it was applied to unsubstantiated claims about the event.
It's a common misconception that the CIA created the term in the 1960s to discredit critics of the Warren Commission. The phrase was in use much earlier.
The earliest known attestation of the idiom "conspiracy theory" in the English language appeared in the mid-19th century.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary and other sources, the earliest known uses of the term occurred around the American Civil War.
1863: The earliest documented use is in a letter to the editor of The New York Times on January 11, 1863. The author, Charles Astor Bristed, used "conspiracy theory" to dismiss claims about British aristocrats conspiring against the U.S. The phrase already carried a dismissive tone, suggesting an improbable explanation.
1860s-1880s: The term saw increased use after President James A. Garfield's assassination in 1881, when it was applied to unsubstantiated claims about the event.
It's a common misconception that the CIA created the term in the 1960s to discredit critics of the Warren Commission. The phrase was in use much earlier.
Forwarded from Fraud Inc.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How (and Why) to Switch to Linux - #SolutionsWatch
(Embedded AI Client-Side Scanning)
Source ➣ (No KYC Sign Up)
#ZOG
#Tech
#Jewry
#OSINT
#SkyNet
#Principles
#ManMade
getmonero.org
Join ➣ @Fraud_Inc
Join ➣ @Fraud_Inc_Chat
Boost ➣ https://news.1rj.ru/str/boost/Fraud_Inc
(Embedded AI Client-Side Scanning)
Source ➣ (No KYC Sign Up)
#ZOG
#Tech
#Jewry
#OSINT
#SkyNet
#Principles
#ManMade
getmonero.org
Join ➣ @Fraud_Inc
Join ➣ @Fraud_Inc_Chat
Boost ➣ https://news.1rj.ru/str/boost/Fraud_Inc
Forwarded from Algorithm of truth
they are testing their weapons on, will do or say anything to keep these secrets of basic
physics. It isn't surprising that a major defense contractor in microwave antenna design
rediscovered a mind reading and influencing RADAR technique given that they are experts
with antenna resonance designs.
Now for the more unintuitive part. It has become common folklore in culture that brain
waves cannot be read by satellites. The people who claim this and the other technology
secrets have been exiled to the land of paranoids and the “mentally ill”. While satellites are
used for the infrared imaging and visual imaging portions of the integrated global
surveillance system, they are not the most probable source and antenna for reading of
human biosignatures. The disinformation agents have been so successful with this
campaign that the mere mention of the technology to government agencies will have you
locked up in a psych ward for three days to add insult to injury for those experimented on.
Let's look at the mathematics and physics behind this possibility though. Perhaps the
uneducated and programmed within the policing function or justice system can understand
some basic mathematics and physics and come to another conclusion.
Just using back of the envelop calculations we can show the feasibility of these
technologies being done by a constellation of satellites or a large phased array of terrestrial
antenna.
Fact #1: SQuID transformers have a sensitivity of 10-15 Teslas or 10-32 Joules. They can
measure the smallest detectable change in a second or equivalently the work required to
raise a single electron 1 millimeter in the Earth's gravitational field.
Fact #2: There are over 100 satellites available for remote sensing the terrestrial landscape
in the sky at any time.
Fact #3: We will use 1000 miles as the average Earth orbiting micro constellation of spy
142satellites‟ average altitude. Satellites orbit between 600 miles to 28,000 miles above the
Earth.
Fact #4: The brain gives off a few femto-Teslas of magnetic flux. The heart gives off
50,000 fT. A depolarizing neuron at its surface creates 70 millivolts and an average ionic
current of Amps. The brains electrical activity at the surface of the scalp is in tens of
microVolts.
Fact #5: A small dipole antenna (piece of metal) cut to operate at 402Mhz like the ones
removed from many “alien ” abductees radiates 2.5milliWatts from the head and
1.25milliWatts if implanted in the chest if that person is radiated with 1 Watt of power.
Biotelemetry and neural telemetry are well studied fields but science fiction to the general
public. Cell phones deliver 5
Watts to the head. And peak pulse power of “alien” signals I have been told deliver 30
Watts to the human body but average power levels are still within SAR safe thresholds.
First let's approach it from an implant perspective. Also assume we know the exact
location of the target of interest. Since there are so many target tracking methods used in
the military systems, this is a reasonable assumption. 2.5x10-3 Watts will weaken by the
square of the distance if radiated equally in all directions. So the needed sensitivity by a
satellite would be
(2.5 x 10-3/(1000 miles x 1.6129 x 103meters/mile)2) x 100 satellites
= 9.61x10-14 Watts or 9.61x10-14 Joules per second.
So that's within 15 orders of magnitude plausible. Or one could state that in the PentaHertz
wavelength (1x10-15 seconds) enough energy could be detected. That extends all the way
into the ultraviolet spectrum. That's an easy feat with just one SQuID transformer satellite.
In fact just a constellation of large antennas would do the trick. But triangulation precision
would be a must. With 100 satellites, you could precisely pinpoint and track that person
and read the brainwaves or heartbeat with “alien” biotelemetric antenna implants. But I
remind you, that ground based mile long phased arrays bounced off the ionosphere is the
most likely source since superconductivity was not discovered until after the first
government neurological torture testing began in the early 1960's.
physics. It isn't surprising that a major defense contractor in microwave antenna design
rediscovered a mind reading and influencing RADAR technique given that they are experts
with antenna resonance designs.
Now for the more unintuitive part. It has become common folklore in culture that brain
waves cannot be read by satellites. The people who claim this and the other technology
secrets have been exiled to the land of paranoids and the “mentally ill”. While satellites are
used for the infrared imaging and visual imaging portions of the integrated global
surveillance system, they are not the most probable source and antenna for reading of
human biosignatures. The disinformation agents have been so successful with this
campaign that the mere mention of the technology to government agencies will have you
locked up in a psych ward for three days to add insult to injury for those experimented on.
Let's look at the mathematics and physics behind this possibility though. Perhaps the
uneducated and programmed within the policing function or justice system can understand
some basic mathematics and physics and come to another conclusion.
Just using back of the envelop calculations we can show the feasibility of these
technologies being done by a constellation of satellites or a large phased array of terrestrial
antenna.
Fact #1: SQuID transformers have a sensitivity of 10-15 Teslas or 10-32 Joules. They can
measure the smallest detectable change in a second or equivalently the work required to
raise a single electron 1 millimeter in the Earth's gravitational field.
Fact #2: There are over 100 satellites available for remote sensing the terrestrial landscape
in the sky at any time.
Fact #3: We will use 1000 miles as the average Earth orbiting micro constellation of spy
142satellites‟ average altitude. Satellites orbit between 600 miles to 28,000 miles above the
Earth.
Fact #4: The brain gives off a few femto-Teslas of magnetic flux. The heart gives off
50,000 fT. A depolarizing neuron at its surface creates 70 millivolts and an average ionic
current of Amps. The brains electrical activity at the surface of the scalp is in tens of
microVolts.
Fact #5: A small dipole antenna (piece of metal) cut to operate at 402Mhz like the ones
removed from many “alien ” abductees radiates 2.5milliWatts from the head and
1.25milliWatts if implanted in the chest if that person is radiated with 1 Watt of power.
Biotelemetry and neural telemetry are well studied fields but science fiction to the general
public. Cell phones deliver 5
Watts to the head. And peak pulse power of “alien” signals I have been told deliver 30
Watts to the human body but average power levels are still within SAR safe thresholds.
First let's approach it from an implant perspective. Also assume we know the exact
location of the target of interest. Since there are so many target tracking methods used in
the military systems, this is a reasonable assumption. 2.5x10-3 Watts will weaken by the
square of the distance if radiated equally in all directions. So the needed sensitivity by a
satellite would be
(2.5 x 10-3/(1000 miles x 1.6129 x 103meters/mile)2) x 100 satellites
= 9.61x10-14 Watts or 9.61x10-14 Joules per second.
So that's within 15 orders of magnitude plausible. Or one could state that in the PentaHertz
wavelength (1x10-15 seconds) enough energy could be detected. That extends all the way
into the ultraviolet spectrum. That's an easy feat with just one SQuID transformer satellite.
In fact just a constellation of large antennas would do the trick. But triangulation precision
would be a must. With 100 satellites, you could precisely pinpoint and track that person
and read the brainwaves or heartbeat with “alien” biotelemetric antenna implants. But I
remind you, that ground based mile long phased arrays bounced off the ionosphere is the
most likely source since superconductivity was not discovered until after the first
government neurological torture testing began in the early 1960's.