Forwarded from Tonya De- FEISTY!!!!
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from DOWNLOADER VIDEO YOUTUBE INSTAGRAM TIKTOK
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from 🇺🇦YoutubeDL - YouTube Download Bot
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (Hungry Dog Press)
Gaia TV embedding Flat Earth propaganda inside Hollow Earth clickbait.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOwLwEgeIHo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOwLwEgeIHo
Forwarded from ned
ned
Gaia TV embedding Flat Earth propaganda inside Hollow Earth clickbait. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOwLwEgeIHo
This guy is so full of shit. The firmament has been gone since the sky fell. What used to be the cosmic egg, a water cylinder from the sun to its binary, is now Earth's oceans and Saturn's rings. See Alfred de Grazia, Quantavolution Volume 5 Solaria Binaria.
The association you are likely searching for involves a tragic helicopter crash that claimed the life of a prominent
submarine pilot and cinematographer who worked extensively on documentaries narrated by Sir David Attenborough.
The Incident: Mike deGruy (2012)
The most notable "submarine pilot" associated with Attenborough documentaries who died in a helicopter crash was Mike deGruy.
Role: DeGruy was a world-renowned underwater cinematographer and a highly experienced pilot of deep-sea submersibles.
The Crash: On February 4, 2012, deGruy was killed in a helicopter crash at Jaspers Brush, Australia. He was scouting filming locations for a project with director James Cameron.
Attenborough Connection: DeGruy was an integral part of the team for the original Blue Planet
(2001). Following his death, Sir David Attenborough described him as an "extraordinary, intrepid, and daring cameraman".
Legacy Documentary: His life is chronicled in the 2020 documentary Diving Deep: The Life and Times of Mike deGruy
, which features archive footage and interviews with David Attenborough and James Cameron.
👍1
ned
This guy is so full of shit. The firmament has been gone since the sky fell. What used to be the cosmic egg, a water cylinder from the sun to its binary, is now Earth's oceans and Saturn's rings. See Alfred de Grazia, Quantavolution Volume 5 Solaria Binaria.…
AI responses may confabulate and track hyperlink activity.
The "underwater lake" you are referring to is a
brine pool, and the footage of it is one of the most famous sequences in deep-ocean documentary history, filmed by the late Mike deGruy.
The "Underwater Lake" (Brine Pool)
While filming for the "The Deep" episode of the original Blue Planet (2001) in the Gulf of Mexico, Mike deGruy encountered a phenomenon that looked like a lake at the bottom of the ocean.
Denser Water: These "lakes" consist of brine, water with a salinity level 3 to 8 times higher than the surrounding seawater. This makes the water so much denser that it does not mix, creating a visible "surface" or shoreline with ripples and waves.
The Mussels: The shores of these brine pools are often ringed with dense beds of methane-eating mussels. These mussels host symbiotic bacteria that convert methane gas seeping from the ocean floor into energy, allowing a thriving ecosystem to exist in the pitch-black deep.
The Submersible Incident: DeGruy famously described trying to pilot his submersible into the lake, only to have the vessel "bounce" off the surface of the dense brine, which he said was "the most amazing thing" he had seen in his career.
Connection to Mike deGruy
The Pilot: DeGruy was a highly skilled submersible pilot and cinematographer who specialized in these extreme environments.
Documentary: His life and this specific discovery are central to the 2019/2020 documentary Diving Deep: The Life and Times of Mike deGruy.
The Crash: As noted previously, deGruy died in a helicopter crash in 2012 while scouting locations in Australia for a project with James Cameron.
Where to Watch the Footage
Blue Planet (2001): Episode 2, "The Deep," features the original footage narrated by Sir David Attenborough.
Blue Planet II (2017): Features updated 4K footage of similar brine pools, including a famous scene where a cutthroat eel suffers toxic shock after accidentally entering the brine.
The "underwater lake" you are referring to is a
brine pool, and the footage of it is one of the most famous sequences in deep-ocean documentary history, filmed by the late Mike deGruy.
The "Underwater Lake" (Brine Pool)
While filming for the "The Deep" episode of the original Blue Planet (2001) in the Gulf of Mexico, Mike deGruy encountered a phenomenon that looked like a lake at the bottom of the ocean.
Denser Water: These "lakes" consist of brine, water with a salinity level 3 to 8 times higher than the surrounding seawater. This makes the water so much denser that it does not mix, creating a visible "surface" or shoreline with ripples and waves.
The Mussels: The shores of these brine pools are often ringed with dense beds of methane-eating mussels. These mussels host symbiotic bacteria that convert methane gas seeping from the ocean floor into energy, allowing a thriving ecosystem to exist in the pitch-black deep.
The Submersible Incident: DeGruy famously described trying to pilot his submersible into the lake, only to have the vessel "bounce" off the surface of the dense brine, which he said was "the most amazing thing" he had seen in his career.
Connection to Mike deGruy
The Pilot: DeGruy was a highly skilled submersible pilot and cinematographer who specialized in these extreme environments.
Documentary: His life and this specific discovery are central to the 2019/2020 documentary Diving Deep: The Life and Times of Mike deGruy.
The Crash: As noted previously, deGruy died in a helicopter crash in 2012 while scouting locations in Australia for a project with James Cameron.
Where to Watch the Footage
Blue Planet (2001): Episode 2, "The Deep," features the original footage narrated by Sir David Attenborough.
Blue Planet II (2017): Features updated 4K footage of similar brine pools, including a famous scene where a cutthroat eel suffers toxic shock after accidentally entering the brine.
AI responses may confabulate.
Tibetan singing bowls that ring together without being struck rely on a phenomenon called
sympathetic resonance. While almost any bowl can exhibit this under the right conditions, certain types and setups are more effective:
1. Large, High-Quality Bowls (Jambati Style)
Jambati bowls are premium, hand-hammered bowls that are particularly easy to experience resonance with due to their size and high-quality metal alloy.
Larger bowls generally produce resonance more quickly and maintain it longer than smaller ones.
2. Bowls Tuned to Identical or Near-Identical Frequencies
Close Tones: For one bowl to "wake up" another without physical contact, they must be very close in tone. When you ring one bowl, another bowl with the same natural frequency will begin to vibrate and sing "in sympathy".
Harmonic Sets: Professional sets are often curated so that the bowls create harmonious intervals (like the "perfect fifth") or match exactly to facilitate this simultaneous ringing effect.
3. Machine-Made / Zen (Rin) Bowls
Consistency: Unlike hand-hammered bowls, machine-finished or lathed Zen bowls (modeled after Japanese Rin bowls) have very even surfaces and precise, single-frequency tones.
Purity: This makes them highly predictable for creating resonant sets where one bowl’s vibration can easily trigger others.
4. Crystal Singing Bowls
High Conductivity: Made of 99.9% pure quartz, these bowls are prized for their high energetic conductivity and powerful, pure tones.
Sustained Vibration: Because they focus on a single strong fundamental note, they are often easier to set off through sympathetic resonance than complex metal bowls.
How to Achieve This Effect
Proximity: Place the bowls close together on a stable surface, such as a silicone mat or ring cushion, which stabilizes them without dampening the vibration.
The "Rimming" Method: Instead of striking, use a suede-padded mallet to rub the outer rim of one bowl in a steady, circular motion. This builds a continuous vibration that is more likely to trigger sympathetic resonance in neighboring bowls than a single strike.
Silence the Source: To test if the other bowls are truly ringing, strike or rub one bowl, then quickly touch it to stop its sound. You will often hear the other bowls continue to hum faintly.
Tibetan singing bowls that ring together without being struck rely on a phenomenon called
sympathetic resonance. While almost any bowl can exhibit this under the right conditions, certain types and setups are more effective:
1. Large, High-Quality Bowls (Jambati Style)
Jambati bowls are premium, hand-hammered bowls that are particularly easy to experience resonance with due to their size and high-quality metal alloy.
Larger bowls generally produce resonance more quickly and maintain it longer than smaller ones.
2. Bowls Tuned to Identical or Near-Identical Frequencies
Close Tones: For one bowl to "wake up" another without physical contact, they must be very close in tone. When you ring one bowl, another bowl with the same natural frequency will begin to vibrate and sing "in sympathy".
Harmonic Sets: Professional sets are often curated so that the bowls create harmonious intervals (like the "perfect fifth") or match exactly to facilitate this simultaneous ringing effect.
3. Machine-Made / Zen (Rin) Bowls
Consistency: Unlike hand-hammered bowls, machine-finished or lathed Zen bowls (modeled after Japanese Rin bowls) have very even surfaces and precise, single-frequency tones.
Purity: This makes them highly predictable for creating resonant sets where one bowl’s vibration can easily trigger others.
4. Crystal Singing Bowls
High Conductivity: Made of 99.9% pure quartz, these bowls are prized for their high energetic conductivity and powerful, pure tones.
Sustained Vibration: Because they focus on a single strong fundamental note, they are often easier to set off through sympathetic resonance than complex metal bowls.
How to Achieve This Effect
Proximity: Place the bowls close together on a stable surface, such as a silicone mat or ring cushion, which stabilizes them without dampening the vibration.
The "Rimming" Method: Instead of striking, use a suede-padded mallet to rub the outer rim of one bowl in a steady, circular motion. This builds a continuous vibration that is more likely to trigger sympathetic resonance in neighboring bowls than a single strike.
Silence the Source: To test if the other bowls are truly ringing, strike or rub one bowl, then quickly touch it to stop its sound. You will often hear the other bowls continue to hum faintly.
❤2
Watch real_sam_fisher with me on Twitch!
Fuser Festival DJ sim
https://www.twitch.tv/real_sam_fisher?sr=a
Fuser Festival DJ sim
https://www.twitch.tv/real_sam_fisher?sr=a
Twitch
real_sam_fisher - Twitch
Demonstrably Demonstrative Demo Extravaganza! Trying out 4 Demos from Xbox Store
😍1
Forwarded from Hungry Dog Press
query:
{In which subjects of non-fiction and genres of fiction does the word appear with the highest statistical frequency, timeline of usage}
In 2026, the word "equanimity" remains a specialized term primarily concentrated in psychological and spiritual non-fiction, while its presence in fiction is most frequent in literary works that emphasize internal character development.
Subject and Genre Frequency
Statistical analysis of textual corpora indicates the following distribution:
Non-Fiction (Highest Frequency):
Psychology & Mental Health: The word appears with high frequency in studies regarding mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), emotional regulation, and stress mitigation.
Spirituality & Religion: It is a core term in literature on Buddhism (as Upekkha), Stoicism, and the Baha'i Faith, where it is defined as a sublime state of mind or "detachment".
Self-Help & Philosophy: Frequently used in "Big Idea" books and instructional guides to describe a desirable trait for navigating modern stress.
Fiction (Highest Frequency):
Literary Fiction: Appears more often here than in genre fiction (like Sci-Fi or Romance) because it often explores complex internal emotional states and character composure.
Historical Fiction: Used to characterize historical figures or narrators known for their stoic or "even-minded" nature in period-appropriate language.
Timeline of Usage
The usage of "equanimity" has evolved from a specific legal/moral term to a general psychological state:
Early 1600s: The term first appears in English, derived from the Latin aequo animo ("with even mind").
1607–1610: Earliest recorded uses (e.g., by religious writer Robert Parker) primarily meant "fairness or justness of judgment".
Late 17th – 19th Century: The meaning shifted toward its current definition of "evenness of temper" and emotional composure.
20th Century – Present: Usage spiked with the westernization of Eastern philosophies (Buddhism/Yoga) and the rise of the mindfulness movement. By 2026, it is standard terminology in digital wellness apps and psychological research as a measurable "non-reactive" trait.
{In which subjects of non-fiction and genres of fiction does the word appear with the highest statistical frequency, timeline of usage}
In 2026, the word "equanimity" remains a specialized term primarily concentrated in psychological and spiritual non-fiction, while its presence in fiction is most frequent in literary works that emphasize internal character development.
Subject and Genre Frequency
Statistical analysis of textual corpora indicates the following distribution:
Non-Fiction (Highest Frequency):
Psychology & Mental Health: The word appears with high frequency in studies regarding mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), emotional regulation, and stress mitigation.
Spirituality & Religion: It is a core term in literature on Buddhism (as Upekkha), Stoicism, and the Baha'i Faith, where it is defined as a sublime state of mind or "detachment".
Self-Help & Philosophy: Frequently used in "Big Idea" books and instructional guides to describe a desirable trait for navigating modern stress.
Fiction (Highest Frequency):
Literary Fiction: Appears more often here than in genre fiction (like Sci-Fi or Romance) because it often explores complex internal emotional states and character composure.
Historical Fiction: Used to characterize historical figures or narrators known for their stoic or "even-minded" nature in period-appropriate language.
Timeline of Usage
The usage of "equanimity" has evolved from a specific legal/moral term to a general psychological state:
Early 1600s: The term first appears in English, derived from the Latin aequo animo ("with even mind").
1607–1610: Earliest recorded uses (e.g., by religious writer Robert Parker) primarily meant "fairness or justness of judgment".
Late 17th – 19th Century: The meaning shifted toward its current definition of "evenness of temper" and emotional composure.
20th Century – Present: Usage spiked with the westernization of Eastern philosophies (Buddhism/Yoga) and the rise of the mindfulness movement. By 2026, it is standard terminology in digital wellness apps and psychological research as a measurable "non-reactive" trait.