Seven-year-old Cassidy Baracka vomited for over eight hours after receiving her first Covid mRNA injection.

She was then given a second dose, which proved fatal.

Despite this, her death certificate says she died from Covid-19.

For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia

Merch: https://wideawake.clothing

X | IG | Rumble

Witnesses of the Rendlesham Forest Incident - Witnesses of the Rendlesham Forrest Incident YouTube

This very famous, British UFO encounter from the 1980s near the Bentwaters and Woodbridge USAF / RAF airbases, doesn't sound anything like an encounter with aliens at all, after listening from these never heard before eyewitness accounts.
'Interdimensional' is the only conclusion you can reach.
Spiritual.
Supernatural.
Demonic...
Call it what you want, you just can't call it 'Aliens' after this.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QMnOuf11J7k&si=uAUuJBvsxzX037Hz

Gas Resources – gasresources.net
https://www.gasresources.net/


Gas Resources
Gas Resources

gasresources.net
Home

The public-access pages on this site are presently being built to provide easy reference to various publications involving modern petroleum science. Modern petroleum science, – or what is called often the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins, – is an extensive body of knowledge which has been recorded in thousands of articles published in the mainstream, Russian-language scientific journals, and in many books and monographs. However, effectively nothing of modern petroleum science has been published in the U.S.A., and this body of knowledge remains largely unknown in the English-speaking world. For reason of this circumstance, a brief introduction to modern Russian petroleum science has been written separately, and is offered together with a brief indication of some of its immediate economic consequences.
The unfamiliarity with the Russian-language scientific literature has been further worsened by the bizarre circumstance that modern Russian petroleum science has been subject to the most extensive attempt at plagiarism in the history of modern science. This particular aspect of the history of this body of knowledge is taken up in the section dealing with the political and sociological essays.

The articles on this site have been put here to accommodate the many requests for reprints and further information, received during the past few years following the publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. of an article formally enunciating the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins and demonstrating the high-pressure genesis of petroleum. Therefore, although the articles on these pages have been contributed by more than a dozen authors, the majority have been written or coauthored by Dr. J. F. Kenney, of both the Russian Academy of Sciences and Gas Resources Corporation. It deserves to be recognized that all of the contributors to these articles that deal with petroleum science and petroleum operations are all highly competent oil and gas men and women. All have extensive experience in discovering and producing petroleum.
In the pages containing articles connected with petroleum economics, there are several papers by Professor Michael C. Lynch of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology which address directly the myth of “oil exhaustion.” There is also a link to an article by Professor Peter Odell of the London School of Economics concerning the common misperceptions connected with petroleum economics.

One should understand that these papers cannot give justice to the immense literature of modern Russian petroleum science. During the half century between 1951-2001, there have been thousands of articles published in the mainstream Russian scientific journals on the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins, and many books and monographs. For example, V. A. Krayushkin has published more than two hundred fifty articles on modern petroleum geology, and several books.

In light of the extensive literature of modern Russian petroleum science, questions inevitably arise among persons reading of it for the first time: Why has there been nothing published on this body of knowledge in the English-language (or American) journals which purportedly deal with matters involving petroleum ? Why have there never been Russian or Ukrainian petroleum scientists invited to address a meeting of, e.g., the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (A.A.P.G.) ? Why has there not been appointed to the faculty of a single department of Earth sciences, at any university in the U.S.A., a petroleum scientist competent to teach modern petroleum science ? In short, why have persons in the U.S.A. never heard of this body of knowledge ?

Gas Resources dotnet website GONE
(still available on the WayBack Machine archive.org back to 2002)

The articles on this site have been put here to accommodate the many requests for reprints and further information, received during the past few years following the publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. of an article formally enunciating the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins and demonstrating the high-pressure genesis of petroleum. Therefore, although the articles on these pages have been contributed by more than a dozen authors, the majority have been written or coauthored by Dr. J. F. Kenney, of both the Russian Academy of Sciences and Gas Resources Corporation. It deserves to be recognized that all of the contributors to these articles that deal with petroleum science and petroleum operations are all highly competent oil and gas men and women. All have extensive experience in discovering and producing petroleum.
In the pages containing articles connected with petroleum economics, there are several papers by Professor Michael C. Lynch of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology which address directly the myth of “oil exhaustion.” There is also a link to an article by Professor Peter Odell of the London School of Economics concerning the common misperceptions connected with petroleum economics.

One should understand that these papers cannot give justice to the immense literature of modern Russian petroleum science. During the half century between 1951-2001, there have been thousands of articles published in the mainstream Russian scientific journals on the modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins, and many books and monographs. For example, V. A. Krayushkin has published more than two hundred fifty articles on modern petroleum geology, and several books.

Roseanne ❤️

Spoiler
I did not suspect but neither am I surprised that this Irish movie turned out to be about a Catholic conspiracy only the plot twist comes first, that the victims are Quaker and not Protestant.

It's ironic how we conflate "dimensions" & "densities" as a common message from Contactees reverberating a need to achieve higher dimensions of consciousness, but when we say higher density, it lends the idea of someone so dense that there's no room for any new thoughts to enter their mind.

#Æthers

https://bsky.app/profile/o0ned.bsky.social/post/3mbkuhraulk2k



Worse, tell them Arthur Eddington faked the 1919 solar eclipse data & man-made UFOs are actually designed with ether physics: Einstein preachers look at you like you're an interdimensional demon fresh out of a hypertimespace wormhole, as if the term "internal parasite" never entered their vocabulary

https://bsky.app/profile/o0ned.bsky.social/post/3ma3rg5iz2k2d

It's finally happening in Iran... - Asmongold YouTube

I wonder why this isn't in the news and I have to find out about it from Asmongold of all people, that the Iranian regime is falling, with massive and in some cases, violent protests across 26 of the 31 Iranian provinces and now into it's 8th consecutive day.
Their brutal regime really does look to be coming to an end...
Maybe this is why Maduro is being covered so much, rather than this?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Cqtv8HZoU6g&si=fjr7TGyHhP84KmUG

AI responses may confabulate and track hyperlink activity.

Gleb Nosovskiy
(also spelled Gleb Nosovsky) is a Russian mathematician and publicist best known as a primary co-author of the New Chronology theory alongside Anatoly Fomenko. Born on January 26, 1958, in Moscow, he is a graduate of Moscow State University and has a background in probability theory and computer geometry.
Key Facts

Role in New Chronology: Since 1995, Nosovskiy has co-authored numerous books with Fomenko, claiming that conventional world history was largely falsified or misdated between the 16th and 19th centuries.
Controversial Claims: His work suggests radical historical revisions, such as dating the life of Jesus to 1152–1185 AD and reimagining a "Rus-Tartary" empire.
Academic Reception: While he holds a degree in physics and mathematics, his historical theories are widely rejected by the mainstream scientific and historical communities as pseudohistory or pseudoscience.
Current Standing: As of 2026, he remains associated with the Moscow State University Department of Mathematics and Mechanics and continues to promote the New Chronology through various multimedia platforms.

Variations in Spelling

Gleb Nosovskiy: Commonly used in the noscripts of his English-translated book series, History: Fiction or Science?.
Gleb Nosovsky: Frequently used in academic citations, library catalogs, and Wikipedia.
Глеб Носовский: The original Russian spelling of his name.

Gleb Nosovskiy’s career is primarily defined by his transition from mainstream mathematics at Moscow State University to the radical historical revisionism known as "
New Chronology."
Timeline of Key Milestones

1958: Born on January 26 in Moscow.
1980s: Attended lectures by Professor Mikhail Postnikov at Moscow State University, which introduced him to the chronological revisionist ideas of Nikolai Morozov.
1995: Formally began his permanent co-authorship with Anatoly Fomenko, marking the start of the "New Chronology" book series.
2003: Published work applying astronomical methods to date the life of Jesus to 1152–1185 AD.
2019: The "Multimedia Museum of a New View on History" opened in Yaroslavl, dedicated to the work of Fomenko and Nosovskiy.
2023–2024: Published latest major English reconstructions, including Volume 8 of the core series.
2026: Continues as a faculty member at Moscow State University in the Department of Mathematics and Mechanics while promoting revised global history.

Integrated Bibliography (Major English Works)
The following is an integrated list of key publications from the History: Fiction or Science? series, which serves as the comprehensive foundation of his work. These books are often released in multiple editions; dates reflect significant English-language versions available on platforms like Amazon or AbeBooks.

Chronology 1: Dating Methods as Offered by Mathematical Statistics (2016/2026 Reprint) – Details the statistical flaws in traditional dating.
Chronology 2: The Dynastic Parallelisms (2018) – Uses mathematical modeling to argue that different historical dynasties are actually "duplicates" of the same rulers.
Chronology 3: Astronomical Methods as Applied to Chronology (2007/2018) – Re-dates the Almagest of Ptolemy and Egyptian zodiacs to the 11th–16th centuries.
Chronology 4: Russia, Britain, Byzantium, Rome (2008) – Claims "Ancient" Rome and Byzantium were medieval entities.
Chronology 5: Russia = Horde (2020) – Identifies the Mongol Empire with a medieval Russian-Tartar state.
Chronology 6: The Horde-Ataman Empire & The Bible (2020) – Reinterprets Biblical history and the conquest of America.
Chronology 7: A Reconstruction of Global History (2024) – Provides a synthesized timeline of the proposed "Great Empire".
Volume 8: Reconstruction of Chronology (September 2023) – Features a "fully improved, cross-checked bibliography" and summarizes 40 years of research.

Greece 🇬🇷 closes its airspace over mysterious noise frequency

It follows recent similar events of flights being disrupted in random European countries.

Chair of the Association of Greek Air Traffic Controllers said it appears to be a collapse of the central radio frequency systems serving the Athens and Macedonia area control centers.

https://www.jpost.com/international/article-882250

how do "Dark Web" searches differ from conventional indexed searches.

AI Overview
+7
Dark Web searches differ from conventional ones because
they access intentionally hidden, unindexed content requiring special browsers (like Tor) and unique .onion URLs, focusing on anonymity via layered encryption (onion routing) rather than public indexing, making them decentralized, less reliable, and often requiring direct links or dark web-specific search engines (like Torch) to find content that is intentionally difficult for standard crawlers to find.
Conventional Search (Surface Web)

Indexing: Uses massive crawlers (spiders) to map and index billions of public web pages, making them searchable via keywords.
Access: Standard browsers (Chrome, Firefox) and typical URLs (e.g., .com, .org).
Anonymity: Low; IP addresses and browsing are traceable.
Structure: Centralized search engines (Google, Bing) organize results.

Dark Web Search

Indexing: Actively avoids standard indexing; relies on specialized dark web search engines or direct links.
Access: Requires anonymizing software like the Tor browser and specific ".onion" addresses (e.g., eajwlvm3z2lcca76.onion).
Anonymity: High; uses "onion routing" to obscure IP addresses through multiple relays.
Structure: Decentralized, with content frequently appearing/disappearing; relies on community input, forums, and manually shared links.

Key Differences Summarized

Visibility: Surface web is indexed; Dark Web is hidden.
Tools: Surface uses normal browsers; Dark Web uses Tor.
Addresses: Surface uses standard URLs; Dark Web uses complex .onion links.
Reliability: Surface is generally stable; Dark Web content changes rapidly.
Purpose: Surface for general info; Dark Web for anonymity (legal and illegal).


Dive Deeper in AI Mode

"Dark Web" searches in 2026 differ fundamentally from conventional surface web searches (like Google or Bing) in their accessibility, indexing methods, and underlying technology.

Key differences include:
1. Accessibility and Specialized Software

Restricted Access: Conventional searches are performed via standard browsers (Chrome, Safari, Firefox) on the "surface web".
Specialized Browsers: Dark web content is hosted on encrypted overlay networks, or "darknets," primarily the Tor network. Accessing these sites requires specialized software like the Tor Browser, which handles the multi-layered "onion routing" needed to reach .onion domains.

2. Indexing and Search Scope

Active Resistance: Unlike the surface web, which is designed for discovery, the dark web is built for anonymity and often actively resists crawling and indexing.
Unlinked Infrastructure: Conventional search engines use automated "crawlers" that follow links from one site to another to map the web. Dark web sites are often not interlinked, making traditional crawling largely ineffective.
Manual Submissions: Dark web search engines (e.g., Ahmia or Torch) frequently rely on manual user submissions or specialized Tor-based crawlers that are slower and less comprehensive.

3. Ranking and Result Quality

Basic Algorithms: Surface web engines use complex algorithms based on authority, relevance, and user behavior to rank results. Dark web engines typically use much simpler ranking systems, often prioritizing site recency or manual curation.
Volatility: Dark web sites are notoriously transient; they often go offline or change addresses frequently to avoid detection, leading to many "broken" or outdated links in search results.

4. Content and Filtering

Unfiltered Results: While Google blacklists or deprioritizes harmful content, many dark web search engines like Torch or Haystak are uncensored, displaying raw results that may include illicit marketplaces, scams, or malware.
Safety-First Alternatives: Some specialized engines, such as Ahmia, voluntarily filter out illegal materials (like child exploitation content) to provide a "cleaner" experience.

Joshua Richards
https://youtube.com/@accessosint
Access OSINT