Forwarded from ned
AI BS
While there is no formal academic "bridge" between Peter Turchin's cliodynamics and the Shemita/Jubilee cycle, critics and independent researchers have noted that Turchin’s 50-year peaks are
not fixed dates, but flexible intervals of roughly 40–60 years.
1. The 10-Year "Drift" in Reviews
Observers note that Turchin's "peaks" (1870, 1920, 1970) are often offset from the strictly fixed "0" and "5" years of the Jubilee (1930, 1980, 2030) because they track different types of data:
Political Violence vs. Debt Resets: Turchin’s cycles track sociopolitical instability (riots, lynchings, and internal strife) which tend to peak just before or during a systemic collapse.
Economic Lag: In many reviews of his work, the "10-year difference" you noticed is seen as the gap between social unrest (Turchin's focus) and economic "cleansing" (the focus of Jubilee/Shemita cycles). For example, the social unrest of the late 1960s/early 1970s preceded the stagflation and market resets of the late 1970s and 1980.
2. Turchin's View on "Fixed" Cycles
Turchin himself is highly skeptical of "clockwork" cycles like the Shemita. He argues his 50-year "Fathers and Sons" cycle is a dynamical system driven by biological human memory, which can be speeded up or slowed down by policy.
1870 Peak: Aligns closely with post-Civil War instability.
1920 Peak: Aligns with the Red Scare and post-WWI labor unrest.
1970 Peak: Aligns with the Vietnam era and Civil Rights unrest.
2020 Peak: Turchin accurately predicted a major spike in 2020, which actually aligns closer to the Shemita/Jubilee timeline than his previous peaks did.
3. Comparison of 2020–2030 Trends
Researchers looking at both models suggest the "Age of Discord" (Turchin's term) is a protracted decade rather than a single year.
Turchin's Model: Suggests we entered a "disintegrative phase" in 2020 that could last 10–15 years until the "wealth pump" is reversed.
Jubilee Model: Points toward 2030 as the final "reset" year.
Synthesis: Some independent analysts (like John Mauldin) suggest Turchin's social peak in 2020 was the "trigger" that leads into the economic reset of the late 2020s, potentially resolving the 10-year discrepancy.
In short, the 10-year difference is typically viewed as the time it takes for social anger (2020) to eventually force a total economic restructuring (2030).
While there is no formal academic "bridge" between Peter Turchin's cliodynamics and the Shemita/Jubilee cycle, critics and independent researchers have noted that Turchin’s 50-year peaks are
not fixed dates, but flexible intervals of roughly 40–60 years.
1. The 10-Year "Drift" in Reviews
Observers note that Turchin's "peaks" (1870, 1920, 1970) are often offset from the strictly fixed "0" and "5" years of the Jubilee (1930, 1980, 2030) because they track different types of data:
Political Violence vs. Debt Resets: Turchin’s cycles track sociopolitical instability (riots, lynchings, and internal strife) which tend to peak just before or during a systemic collapse.
Economic Lag: In many reviews of his work, the "10-year difference" you noticed is seen as the gap between social unrest (Turchin's focus) and economic "cleansing" (the focus of Jubilee/Shemita cycles). For example, the social unrest of the late 1960s/early 1970s preceded the stagflation and market resets of the late 1970s and 1980.
2. Turchin's View on "Fixed" Cycles
Turchin himself is highly skeptical of "clockwork" cycles like the Shemita. He argues his 50-year "Fathers and Sons" cycle is a dynamical system driven by biological human memory, which can be speeded up or slowed down by policy.
1870 Peak: Aligns closely with post-Civil War instability.
1920 Peak: Aligns with the Red Scare and post-WWI labor unrest.
1970 Peak: Aligns with the Vietnam era and Civil Rights unrest.
2020 Peak: Turchin accurately predicted a major spike in 2020, which actually aligns closer to the Shemita/Jubilee timeline than his previous peaks did.
3. Comparison of 2020–2030 Trends
Researchers looking at both models suggest the "Age of Discord" (Turchin's term) is a protracted decade rather than a single year.
Turchin's Model: Suggests we entered a "disintegrative phase" in 2020 that could last 10–15 years until the "wealth pump" is reversed.
Jubilee Model: Points toward 2030 as the final "reset" year.
Synthesis: Some independent analysts (like John Mauldin) suggest Turchin's social peak in 2020 was the "trigger" that leads into the economic reset of the late 2020s, potentially resolving the 10-year discrepancy.
In short, the 10-year difference is typically viewed as the time it takes for social anger (2020) to eventually force a total economic restructuring (2030).
Forwarded from ned
Killuminati - The Movie.mp4
1.8 GB
Jade Helm 15 Rehash
AI BS While there is no formal academic "bridge" between Peter Turchin's cliodynamics and the Shemita/Jubilee cycle, critics and independent researchers have noted that Turchin’s 50-year peaks are not fixed dates, but flexible intervals of roughly 40–60 years.…
To connect a mesh network (like
Meshtastic or Gotenna) to Bluesky, you must bridge the gap between a protocol-less physical layer (mesh) and the AT Protocol (Bluesky’s decentralized backbone). Because mesh networks are often "off-grid" and Bluesky requires an internet-facing server, you need a Gateway Node.
1. The Gateway Architecture
You cannot run a full Bluesky "Relay" on a low-power mesh device (like an ESP32). Instead, you use a dual-homed device—a computer or Raspberry Pi connected to both the mesh radio and a standard internet connection (Wi-Fi/Cellular).
The Mesh Side: Receives packets via LoRa or Bluetooth.
The Logic Layer: A noscript (Python/Node.js) filters mesh messages for specific "triggers" (e.g., a message starting with !post).
The Bluesky Side: The noscript uses the ATProto SDK to authenticate and push the text to your Bluesky handle.
2. Tools for Implementation
For Meshtastic Users: Use the Meshtastic Python API. You can write a listener noscript that monitors the mesh traffic. When it sees a specific channel message, it triggers a function using the atproto Python SDK to post the content.
Matrix Bridging: Many mesh users bridge to Matrix.org. Since there are existing Matrix-to-Bluesky bridges, you can "chain" these: Mesh → Matrix → Bluesky. This is the most stable method for non-coders.
3. Key Challenges: Rate Limits & Size
Character Limits: Mesh packets (especially LoRa) are extremely small (typically ~200 bytes). This fits a Bluesky post (300 chars) well, but you cannot transmit high-resolution images over the mesh to Bluesky easily.
Authentication: You should use App Passwords created in Bluesky Settings rather than your main password to secure the gateway node.
The "Decentralized" Paradox: While both are decentralized, Bluesky relies on Personal Data Servers (PDS). If your mesh gateway loses internet, your posts will "queue" locally until the gateway finds a backhaul connection.
4. Why this matters for the "Cycles" we discussed
In the context of Turchin’s "Age of Discord" or a Jubilee-style collapse, these bridges are viewed as resilience infrastructure. If the central internet backbone faces regional outages, mesh-to-Bluesky gateways allow local information to "leak" out to the global decentralized web.
Would you like a Python code snippet to start building a basic Meshtastic-to-Bluesky bot, or are you looking for hardware recommendations for the gateway?
Meshtastic or Gotenna) to Bluesky, you must bridge the gap between a protocol-less physical layer (mesh) and the AT Protocol (Bluesky’s decentralized backbone). Because mesh networks are often "off-grid" and Bluesky requires an internet-facing server, you need a Gateway Node.
1. The Gateway Architecture
You cannot run a full Bluesky "Relay" on a low-power mesh device (like an ESP32). Instead, you use a dual-homed device—a computer or Raspberry Pi connected to both the mesh radio and a standard internet connection (Wi-Fi/Cellular).
The Mesh Side: Receives packets via LoRa or Bluetooth.
The Logic Layer: A noscript (Python/Node.js) filters mesh messages for specific "triggers" (e.g., a message starting with !post).
The Bluesky Side: The noscript uses the ATProto SDK to authenticate and push the text to your Bluesky handle.
2. Tools for Implementation
For Meshtastic Users: Use the Meshtastic Python API. You can write a listener noscript that monitors the mesh traffic. When it sees a specific channel message, it triggers a function using the atproto Python SDK to post the content.
Matrix Bridging: Many mesh users bridge to Matrix.org. Since there are existing Matrix-to-Bluesky bridges, you can "chain" these: Mesh → Matrix → Bluesky. This is the most stable method for non-coders.
3. Key Challenges: Rate Limits & Size
Character Limits: Mesh packets (especially LoRa) are extremely small (typically ~200 bytes). This fits a Bluesky post (300 chars) well, but you cannot transmit high-resolution images over the mesh to Bluesky easily.
Authentication: You should use App Passwords created in Bluesky Settings rather than your main password to secure the gateway node.
The "Decentralized" Paradox: While both are decentralized, Bluesky relies on Personal Data Servers (PDS). If your mesh gateway loses internet, your posts will "queue" locally until the gateway finds a backhaul connection.
4. Why this matters for the "Cycles" we discussed
In the context of Turchin’s "Age of Discord" or a Jubilee-style collapse, these bridges are viewed as resilience infrastructure. If the central internet backbone faces regional outages, mesh-to-Bluesky gateways allow local information to "leak" out to the global decentralized web.
Would you like a Python code snippet to start building a basic Meshtastic-to-Bluesky bot, or are you looking for hardware recommendations for the gateway?
Jade Helm 15 Rehash
AI BS While there is no formal academic "bridge" between Peter Turchin's cliodynamics and the Shemita/Jubilee cycle, critics and independent researchers have noted that Turchin’s 50-year peaks are not fixed dates, but flexible intervals of roughly 40–60 years.…
Historical Cycles vs. Physical Eschatology
While historical eschatology focuses on human destiny, physical eschatology (scientific cosmology) focuses on the "end" of the material universe.
Synthesis: Modern theological scholars, such as N.T. Wright, argue for a "realized eschatology" where the "end" is not a destruction of the world but its radical transformation. This matches the Jubilee's goal: not the end of the land, but its restoration to its original state.
While historical eschatology focuses on human destiny, physical eschatology (scientific cosmology) focuses on the "end" of the material universe.
Synthesis: Modern theological scholars, such as N.T. Wright, argue for a "realized eschatology" where the "end" is not a destruction of the world but its radical transformation. This matches the Jubilee's goal: not the end of the land, but its restoration to its original state.
Jade Helm 15 Rehash
AI BS While there is no formal academic "bridge" between Peter Turchin's cliodynamics and the Shemita/Jubilee cycle, critics and independent researchers have noted that Turchin’s 50-year peaks are not fixed dates, but flexible intervals of roughly 40–60 years.…
2030 Jubilee: Eschatological Milestones
The year 2030 is increasingly viewed as a "collision point" between biblical prophecy, economic cycles, and globalist agendas. Because it marks roughly 2,000 years since the traditional date of the Crucifixion (30 AD), many eschatological frameworks identify it as a "Super Jubilee" or the 120th Jubilee from the creation of Adam.
The 6,000-Year Theory: A prevalent belief in Messiah 2030 and similar circles is the "Millennial Week" theory: that human history spans 6,000 years of "labor" followed by a 1,000-year "Sabbath" (the Millennial Reign). Under this model, 2030 serves as the transition from the 6th to the 7th millennium.
The "40 Jubilees" Milestone: Prophetic analysts point to the "40 Jubilees" (2,000 years) that have passed since 30 AD, drawing a parallel to the 40 years Israel spent in the wilderness before entering the Promised Land.
Economic "Great Reset": Secular and religious critics alike note that the UN's "Agenda 2030" goals for universal digital ID, health care, and environmental resets coincide with the biblical Jubilee concept of a total debt "release" and social restructuring.
The 3.5-Year Trigger: Some eschatological models suggest a "Great Tribulation" beginning in the spring of 2027, culminating in 2030 with a global "Day of Vengeance" or the return of the Messiah.
Historical Cycles vs. Physical Eschatology
While historical eschatology focuses on human destiny, physical eschatology (scientific cosmology) focuses on the "end" of the material universe.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SamFisherDatadrops/40402
Synthesis: Modern theological scholars, such as N.T. Wright, argue for a "realized eschatology" where the "end" is not a destruction of the world but its radical transformation. This matches the Jubilee's goal: not the end of the land, but its restoration to its original state.
The year 2030 is increasingly viewed as a "collision point" between biblical prophecy, economic cycles, and globalist agendas. Because it marks roughly 2,000 years since the traditional date of the Crucifixion (30 AD), many eschatological frameworks identify it as a "Super Jubilee" or the 120th Jubilee from the creation of Adam.
The 6,000-Year Theory: A prevalent belief in Messiah 2030 and similar circles is the "Millennial Week" theory: that human history spans 6,000 years of "labor" followed by a 1,000-year "Sabbath" (the Millennial Reign). Under this model, 2030 serves as the transition from the 6th to the 7th millennium.
The "40 Jubilees" Milestone: Prophetic analysts point to the "40 Jubilees" (2,000 years) that have passed since 30 AD, drawing a parallel to the 40 years Israel spent in the wilderness before entering the Promised Land.
Economic "Great Reset": Secular and religious critics alike note that the UN's "Agenda 2030" goals for universal digital ID, health care, and environmental resets coincide with the biblical Jubilee concept of a total debt "release" and social restructuring.
The 3.5-Year Trigger: Some eschatological models suggest a "Great Tribulation" beginning in the spring of 2027, culminating in 2030 with a global "Day of Vengeance" or the return of the Messiah.
Historical Cycles vs. Physical Eschatology
While historical eschatology focuses on human destiny, physical eschatology (scientific cosmology) focuses on the "end" of the material universe.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/SamFisherDatadrops/40402
Synthesis: Modern theological scholars, such as N.T. Wright, argue for a "realized eschatology" where the "end" is not a destruction of the world but its radical transformation. This matches the Jubilee's goal: not the end of the land, but its restoration to its original state.
Telegram
Sam Fisher (Data Drops)
Historical Cycles vs. Physical Eschatology
While historical eschatology focuses on human destiny, physical eschatology (scientific cosmology) focuses on the "end" of the material universe.
Synthesis: Modern theological scholars, such as N.T. Wright, argue…
While historical eschatology focuses on human destiny, physical eschatology (scientific cosmology) focuses on the "end" of the material universe.
Synthesis: Modern theological scholars, such as N.T. Wright, argue…
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (ned)
connecting
Meshtastic to Telegram is generally considered easier than connecting to Bluesky or Matrix because Telegram has a long-standing, robust bot API and several ready-made open-source bridge projects specifically for Meshtastic.
1. The "Direct Bot" Method (Easiest)
While Bluesky requires more complex AT Protocol handling, you can use dedicated Python-based gateways to link a Meshtastic node directly to a Telegram bot.
How it works: You run a noscript on a computer (like a Raspberry Pi) connected to your Meshtastic node via USB or Wi-Fi. The noscript uses a Telegram Bot Token to forward messages between the mesh and a specific Telegram chat or group.
Popular Tool: meshtastic-telegram-gateway is a widely used project that passes user nicks in both directions, making it feel like a seamless chat.
2. The "Matrix Bridge" Method (Most Versatile)
If you already use a Matrix homeserver, you can "chain" your connections. Because Matrix has high-quality bridges for almost everything, you can setup:
Meshtastic → Matrix → Telegram
This is "easy" if you are already in the Matrix ecosystem, as it allows you to manage multiple platforms (Discord, WhatsApp, Telegram) from a single mesh gateway.
However, setting up a full Matrix bridge (like Mautrix-Telegram) is significantly more complex than just running a simple Telegram bot noscript.
Meshtastic to Telegram is generally considered easier than connecting to Bluesky or Matrix because Telegram has a long-standing, robust bot API and several ready-made open-source bridge projects specifically for Meshtastic.
1. The "Direct Bot" Method (Easiest)
While Bluesky requires more complex AT Protocol handling, you can use dedicated Python-based gateways to link a Meshtastic node directly to a Telegram bot.
How it works: You run a noscript on a computer (like a Raspberry Pi) connected to your Meshtastic node via USB or Wi-Fi. The noscript uses a Telegram Bot Token to forward messages between the mesh and a specific Telegram chat or group.
Popular Tool: meshtastic-telegram-gateway is a widely used project that passes user nicks in both directions, making it feel like a seamless chat.
2. The "Matrix Bridge" Method (Most Versatile)
If you already use a Matrix homeserver, you can "chain" your connections. Because Matrix has high-quality bridges for almost everything, you can setup:
Meshtastic → Matrix → Telegram
This is "easy" if you are already in the Matrix ecosystem, as it allows you to manage multiple platforms (Discord, WhatsApp, Telegram) from a single mesh gateway.
However, setting up a full Matrix bridge (like Mautrix-Telegram) is significantly more complex than just running a simple Telegram bot noscript.
Forwarded from Jade Helm 15 Rehash (ned)
4. Implementation Steps for Telegram
Create Bot: Message @BotFather on Telegram to get your API Token.
Hardware: Connect your Meshtastic node to a PC/Pi via USB or use its IP address if it's on your Wi-Fi.
Run Gateway: Download a project like meshtastic-telegram-bot, enter your token in the config file, and run the noscript.
Would you like the specific terminal commands to install the Python dependencies for a Telegram-Meshtastic bridge?
Create Bot: Message @BotFather on Telegram to get your API Token.
Hardware: Connect your Meshtastic node to a PC/Pi via USB or use its IP address if it's on your Wi-Fi.
Run Gateway: Download a project like meshtastic-telegram-bot, enter your token in the config file, and run the noscript.
Would you like the specific terminal commands to install the Python dependencies for a Telegram-Meshtastic bridge?
Forwarded from Mind Control, MK Ultra, Monarch, Ritual, TI
A day late but... 2026 Week 3 Spot The Symbolism 3 https://yabasta1.wordpress.com/2026/01/18/week-3-spot-the-symbolism-3/ #spotthesymbolism #symbolism #iran #shah
foxblog5 Symbolism Posts
Week 3 Spot The Symbolism 3
Spot the Symbolism for 2026 week 3.